Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "The New York Times" channel.

  1. How about we let the women figure out how to be women, NYT?
    10
  2. The New York Times No, thanks! I like to chew my own food as well...
    5
  3. It means the government better refrain from gun grabbing, because the criminals won't give up anything and they can also make their own...
    4
  4. Naturally not Biden. He belongs behind bars. He's unbelievably stupid. And he's far too grabby with children...
    3
  5. The New York Times 30 videos? Yeah? But you forgot the squad leader's video from when the room was breached, where he breaks radio silence and twice repeats "No windows broken! Shooter not secure!" – that being after the team had already found Paddock dead. And you asume too much. Who knows what was in the closed suitcases? Where's the police investigation into the origin of Stephen Paddock's wealth? An alleged crime without a motive and flimsy circumstantial evidence at best? Get outahere! This is nowhere near the real story and stinks of a coverup.
    2
  6. This is the tight hotel security we heard the sheriff mention? 😡😖🙄 ... And the NYT chimes in with an inane "the valet had no way of knowing"??!! Well, if that were true, where are the metal detectors and what good are they?
    2
  7. bongo155 It means "what women decide to do with their lives". Being a woman is a woman's business, isn't it?
    2
  8. Eric Koontz I noticed the same. He looks like a robot on standby. You can't tell from this clip, but he suddenly came alive when some dimbulb journalist accused Barr of doing Trump favors. Barr closed that down very effectively by asking what she based her accusations on.
    2
  9. No, torture doesn't work. It's a very crude and incredibly stupid technique, know for getting highly unreliable answers, simply because the subject will say anything and is constantly trying to figure out what the interrogators want to hear. It is also demeaning and unworthy of an evolved culture. It brings USA down on level with the most despicable banana republics and totalitarian regimes and also opens the field for breaking any and all international conventions for wartime engagements to the detriment of all wounded and captive soldiers. It is one of the most significant markers for devolution and despair.
    2
  10. Have you lost your mind? Assuming you had one to loose...
    1
  11. John E Hoover You can delete the link. The video is gone...
    1
  12. Well, their track records were widely different. Hillary was a know traitor. Trump had no problems from politics. He didn't cut Hillary short more than Trump. Your powers of discernment are appallingly weak - or you're deliberately fraudulent in your claim.
    1
  13. Ah, so this is what's passing for "reported new" these days, NYT?
    1
  14. Well, we shall see: Maybe all we're doing is slowing down the spreading rate, so when all is said and done, let's see if Mexico came out slightly worse mortality wise and a lot better financially. I'm taking the recommended precautions, but our cities look dead. Are we perhaps just prolonging the infection process and screwing our economy?
    1
  15. Promoting LSD like CIA did in the sixties, trying to postpone general awakening. Nice job, NYT...
    1
  16. Blake Forehand What's wrong with you? The CIA did and does heinous things, but one of the things the agency did in the sixties was to entice doctors abroad to use LSD as a "therapeutic" by way of faked scientific reports and monetary enticement, causing irreparable harm and many suicides among perfectly curable psychiatric patients, only to expand their knowledge for MKUltra... I tend to block fools like you, to minimize notifications – and I did it again...
    1
  17. This is down to all the lying and cheating displayed by democrats and most MSM during the last four years. There's every reason to expect attempts of huge voter fraud, seeing how the Kamala Biden ticket is so pathetically inadequate. The corruption and cheating simply has to stop.
    1
  18. I hear much the same story applies to how Fauci got the prize…
    1
  19.  @susanaltman5134  All I know is a female professor alleges she did the work and were accepted for printing in the right medical publications, when Fauci demanded that she wait and give him – as head of the institute – time to look it over. She refused (was already a professor in her own right) but he threatened to end her tenure. She gave in and a week later Fauci published her work under his and another doctor’s name. She announced this on public media and said her book is coming out this year, and yet I haven’t heard Fauci dragging her to court. Have you?
    1
  20. Well, this is what reporting looks like when you don't investigate, but simply select some available data to fit your own, preconceived narrative! Try watching with this simple reminder: Everytime the narrator says "the video shows", pretend he said "the video we selected shows". The entire fraud disintegrates. In some cases it's possibly even fair to say "the video we concocted is meant to show"... Where are the video timestamps? Why are they even more blurred that normal surveillance videos? Why would anyone treat the public so disrespectfully? Why don't you simply evaporate, NYT.
    1
  21. I am not aware of any sanctions on delivering oil to North Korea? Which nations have imposed such, if any, please?
    1
  22. John Here You're very naive and misinformed, sheep – or more likely, a complete hypocrite.
    1
  23. John Here How can you say "read it" to others when you haven't read it yourself?
    1
  24. Doesn't show the breach itself. An hour and seventeen minutes too late. Why, if Stephen was firing constantly from a window, couldn't a police sniper take him out? Not exactly impressed...
    1
  25. The New York Times Register this 🖕🏼 NYT
    1
  26. Joe Hoang Stop liking your own obtuse comments!
    1