Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "TomoNews US" channel.

  1. +Moto Fan I have and have been following this case closely. And I've found absolutely no evidence for your claim. But I've heard and seen the like of it fielded as click bait and fairy tales for children without supporting evidence many times. And you of course couldn't present anything even if you tried either, right? But you might have the decency to admit it instead of parroting urban myths and gollywok!
    3
  2. Sure, much more than mets the eye, but the actual route was found on the first pilot's private simulator - which the malaysian government were very hesitant and delayed in investigating, claiming that it had been out of order for more than a year. This fact plus the shutdown of transponder and ACARS happened just after the tower handover combined with the abrupt change of course indicate both planning and pilot involvement. The high number of engineers working on a high profile project pending patentation on the plane points more to higher commercial hardball than to China ...
    2
  3. Very possible that the plane entered the ocean vertically, but that in no way addresses the real stinker: What was the pilots motive for deviating with ACARS and transponder shut down! The heading for this post is therefore wrong...
    1
  4. uguysrnuts Circling is not compatible with the ping-data. An attempt to hide what you claim is too risky. The radio communications could easily be picked up. Nor could mobile com go unregistered. What's you source? Free fantasy?
    1
  5. Show me that "proof"!
    1
  6. Ok migsrock, it's "at least", not "atleast" and one doesn't "do opinions", but "state opinions" or "have" them
    1