Comments by "Juicy Fruit" (@juicyfruit4378) on "Roe v. Wade overturned: Abortion banned in Louisiana" video.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Matt - I agree with you. Also, what I would like to know is why MEN have ZERO choices when it comes to either pro-life / pro-choice simply because the woman carries the child. Roe VS Wade gave women the complete control of life and men zero. Outside of rape or minors becoming pregnant due to limited or no knowledge of the reproductive system, there should never be a "surprise" or unplanned pregnancy. Men have the condom; women have the Pill, Morning after Pill, IUD, and least effective but better than a condom, a diaphragm. I have worked in hospitals for over 15 years now and the cases of men being duped, forced or lied to about a pregnancy is unbelievable. There should be a mandatory Paternity Test for every child born in the USA so a man should never be forced to support a child he didn't father. We have thousands of cases in states like VA and FL where men are forced to pay child support to children belonging to another man - ridiculous. The most common case we find is when a woman decides she wants to "keep" the man she's dating, she'll purposely discontinue to usage of protection after dating exclusively for a period of time (usually around 6-12 months). At this stage, the man, usually, isn't wearing a condom any longer based on the wishes of BOTH partners being in an "exclusive and trusted" relationship. Before you know it: Surprise, I'm pregnant!, even though no surprises took place during the first 6 months of the relationship. It's not a surprise as it was planned by the woman due to maternal instincts and wanting to start a family with "Prince Charming" BTW: Prince Charming wasn't consulted about her desires to start a family - he just has to play along now. Roe VS Wade has shut the man completely out of the decision-making process. He has ZERO choices of either being in the child's, life, paying support for 18 years, having to possibly marry (mainly religious/cultural reasons), or have an say if the pregnancy will be aborted or carried out - again, he has ZERO input. So now, Roe VS Wade is overturned and women are screaming about rights to THEIR bodies? What about men having rights in the decision-making process of wanting or not wanting to be a father? Women are quick to mandate a man's role when it comes to alimony, child support and financial obligations, but any other input is not only unwelcome, but legally blocked for a man. Yes, women will read this and say "it's because the women carry the child." True, however, it's also a woman who controls the entrance to her vagina and if she doesn't want a child, don't let a man enter without having a condom on, AND she should also be protected by her contraceptive. Again, outside of rape, the woman has to AGREE to let a man enter her vagina - if he's not wearing a condom, he doesn't get the key - simple as that. The man too, has to be responsible and wear protection; however as I stated before, once in an exclusive relationship, both parties tend to leave the condom on the shelf as it's understood that the women's protection is far better than a piece of rubber. Roe VS Wade had good provisions regarding cases of bodily harm, rape or medical issues, but it forgot to address men's rights as well. It takes two to create a child, yet only one to make the choice whether it lives or not - doesn't sound correct to me.
1