Comments by "Sedna063" (@Sedna063) on "Russia’s David vs Ukraine’s Goliath? Manpower woes explained." video.

@MrDiscane Russia is not winning though…
18
A lot of misleading ideas.
10
The number of soldiers in an army are not all combat troops.
9
@AnnedolfFrankler911 That’s a pretty lie. If they show any goodwill, they would not fight at all other fronts. The fact is that Russia stalled in their advance in Kyiv and failed to reach the objective. You don’t make such a mad dash for the capital of Ukraine just to not take it in a swipe. Russia failed to reach their objectives. It is widely assumed that Russia wished to quickly get Kyiv and install a pro-Russian marionette government. Nobody who actually knows about military matters (unlike you) assumes otherwise. Face it, Russia is taking a heavy beating.
7
@MrDiscane Again, most of this is fake… Do you need to lie so blatantly? First, the Donbass had voted for Ukrainian independence in the 90s. Neither was there majority support for independence in 2014. then there is Crimea. It was an illegal annexation and the situation on Crimea is bad.
6
@MrDiscane According to objective analysis
5
@MrDiscane Russia also signed some papers… Not that it stopped them from illegally attacking and annexing Ukrainian territories…
5
@ouroboros3141 ??
2
@EaizePeazy 1. Russia doesn’t have nearly enough ballistic missiles to kill of the Ukrainian military. The military structures are intact, their command headquarters are protected and whilst the opening salvo cost them heavily, it did not disrupt them too much. A missile can only be used once and only carries a few tons of explosives. You need dozens or more to reliably take out an airfield for a short period! You overestimate conventional missiles. Too expensive for the buck - only armed with a nuclear warheads they become devastating
2
Ukraine will have enough food for everyone that serves there. If not home produced, the west will provide.
1
@coldsteel.and.courage Literally your entire comment is a fantasy.
1