Comments by "Sedna063" (@Sedna063) on "Sky News" channel.

  1.  @boarfaceswinejaw4516  even then a dude with a couple of other dudes and a spear would win
    34
  2. Give Emma an M16 and she will...
    30
  3. Ah, and what about the Russians who have told us they would have Donbass by September 15th? Who are telling us even now how everything goes according to plan? Who still sing the praise of the military genius...
    18
  4. 1. Donbass is Ukrainian territory. It is their own area that legally belongs to Ukraine. 2. Ask Russia why it wanted those separatists and why it so heavily supports those.
    4
  5. So Russia now created the land and earth? Russia did not create Finland. Russia had to let Finland leave - but then fought a war with them in 1939 (an unprovoked war). Finland lost. They have stolen Finnish lands, have killed Finns, they have harmed them in living memory.
    3
  6. Europe is 200 miles, Libya is 12. Well, bring them to the nearest coast.
    3
  7. There was no such agreement. Bring me the officially ratified document!
    3
  8.  @kerron_  Most countries became independent 60 years ago. Don't blame everything on us.
    2
  9. Don't be dumb. Ukraine is currently not losing the war. Neither would this result in WW3 - don't forget the Russians also want to live...
    2
  10. Finland will survive. Russia probably not.
    2
  11.  @Nick_S0  Risking war with NATO?
    2
  12. Except they did not use a nuke and neither did they cause the explosion
    2
  13. Because the Russian military has not shown to actually do well.
    2
  14.  @brian7443  They actually lost some territory. With their withdrawal around Kyiv and now around Kharkiv. The area around Kherson is contested and the Russian efforts would only secure a small area of the Donbass. I am not impressed with the Russian capabilities that they have shown so far.
    2
  15. 1. Finland has been part of Russia. Finland first became a part of Russia in 1809 after Russia fought against Sweden and won. Russia started a russification policy in Finland in 1899 and cut a lot of the loose autonomy Finland insofar had enjoyed - making them just another province. Had to retract this in 1905. 2. Ukraine is not part of Russia. Ukraine is Ukraine - a sovereign nation that decided in a vote in 1991. 3. Russia has had wars with Finland in living memory. In 1939, Russia attacked Finland unprovoked and annexed large swaths of territory. The Finnish involvement in WW2 was a direct result of this. Finland did not join NATO as they lost the war against the USSR and they made the deal - independence for neutrality. 4. Who knows what Russia wants. Russia was insistant that those troops now in Ukraine only were at the border for months to train and hold maneuvers. Any notion of invasion was ridicouled by Russian media. If I were Finland and have Russia as a neighbour, I'd not be trusting Russia right now when it comes to being a good neighbour. 5. Russia has started the hostilities. Nobody in Finland would entertain thoughts about joining NATO had Russia not invaded Ukraine. Obviously the other neighbours of Russia are worried. 6. Russia already threatened Finland about joining - basically encouraging Finland.
    2
  16.  @moiseshuerta3984  So? Everyone knew that both were fantasies.
    2
  17.  @DS-hf9zb  Nah, wait until the USAF comes
    2
  18.  @justinjoe2749  they waste a ton of time for this. The US soldiers meanwhile used time more productively
    2
  19. Yeah, it would be a shame if one or two bomber squadrons would accidentally drop some...
    2
  20. 1. Let this be NATO to decide whether it is obsolete or not. Right now it looks very much rejuvenated. 2. What treaties would Finland break? I am only aware of Russian failures to stand by contracts. 3. The 1947 treaty did not stipulate neutrality or obligations against joining any organisation. Indeed, a number of nations in those treaties joined the Warsaw Pact. 4. The 1992 Russia-Finland treaty does not stipulate anything like this either...
    2
  21.  @kerron_  Well, the African countries have had enough time to ensure that they develop own companies. it is not always the west
    1
  22. Still better than anarchy.
    1
  23. Finland did not sign such a treaty.
    1
  24. It’s slow…
    1
  25. 1. Russia has taken losses in Kyiv and Kharkiv... 2. Sky news isn't watched in Ukraine that much. 3. Ukraine has intact infrastructure in the west - they are getting by.
    1
  26. They all lost in the end.
    1
  27. 1. They are not yet completely trapped - them fighting also costs Russia time and equipment and makes any victory for them more expensive. 2. The road can be used; the Ukrainians said they don't experience that much shelling over there anymore. 3. Should Severodonezk fall, the region Luhansk is open but Ukraine as a whole? Nope. When will be "soon"? The war started in 24th February; now we have 30th May.
    1
  28.  @steviewonder417  Those people did not chose. Kherson never held a referendum, it was decided that it should be Russian. As for the self-proclaimed Republics, there was never an actual support for this. Any plebiscite was not conducted fairly.
    1
  29. If Russia starts WW3 they die. Simple as that.
    1
  30. Whilst the burning of the quran is not nice, it cannot compare to the burning and looting of a church or embassy. That dude who burned the quran burned his own property. He didn't endanger any lives doing so.
    1
  31. There are no WMD labs in Ukraine lol...
    1
  32. So we are the baddies, not the attacker lol
    1
  33. And what about the "legitimate security entails" of Finland, Ukraine, Baltics, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria? What agreements? Please show me the documents that NATO signed and ratified where they declared that they would not expand. On the other hand, Russia as the successor to the USSR is partner of the Helsinki conference which allows any sovereign state to make alliances as they chosose. He got to learn to accept that this is not the victorian era anymore. Understanding and restraint has been shown over decades. He decided to answer it with a war on Ukraine - only then was NATO membership seriously entertained by Finland. Not before. Yeah, it's our fault that Russia invades. Like a rape victim being at fault for enticing...
    1
  34. They actually want to join because of Russia....
    1
  35. I was barely out of Kindergarten that time. Nethertheless, my nation did not join the US even though we are very closely allied and in NATO. We did join in Afghanistan though but this was a UN-recognised intervention and nobody at that time really had to say something negative about getting rid of a government that harboured terrorists and forbid schooling to women.
    1
  36. Please show me this treaty.
    1
  37.  @brian7443  The idea that there was this pilot ace has always been idiotic. And a single sniper doesn't change much
    1
  38. Stop watching propaganda media. Ask the Finns what they want.
    1
  39. Nobody said that
    1
  40.  @niblet112  The news have never claimed anything like this what Jyala said... Anyway, the news also never said Ukraine was winning. At least not the serious news. They spoke about possibilities. And more so, they spoke about how the current situation constituted a win for Ukraine.
    1
  41. Russia attacked Ukraine - obviously other non-NATO members want to join now...
    1
  42.  @danielhutchinson6604  It's actually Putins war but nice try. What is this with American bots spewing pro-Russian propaganda.
    1
  43. There was no binding agreement. EVER,
    1
  44. EU has done nothing of that sort.
    1
  45.  @aaronlemaster7139  Please show proof
    1
  46. Typhoon. Typhoon is a more modern platform and enjoys better engines. Maneuverability is roughly equal but again, I would give edge to the Typhoon.
    1
  47.  @suryakumairi3622  Most of their "forces" are actually Russian (citiziens before 2014). People in those "Republics" largely left because nobody wanted to live there.
    1
  48. This is how democracy works. Elected MPs and executives are making the decisions, according to polls they are supported by a majority of Fins in this. If not, they can elect opposition members to NATO in numbers next time.
    1
  49.  @Laenthal  Russia will not attempt things - otherwise they will be in war with NATO.
    1
  50. It ends when Russia stops
    1