Comments by "maynunal" (@maynunal) on "Fox Business"
channel.
-
918
-
59
-
55
-
48
-
33
-
33
-
28
-
26
-
23
-
21
-
19
-
17
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The Trump Lie On Air quality
"We want to have the cleanest water on Earth. We want to have the cleanest air on Earth. Our numbers, as you saw -- we had record numbers come out very recently. Our numbers are very, very good -- our environmental numbers. Our water numbers, our -- our numbers on-air are tremendous...But we are doing better right now than we've ever done, in terms of cleanliness, in terms of numbers." -- January 22 press conference in Davos, Switzerland
Facts First: By several measures, US air was cleaner under Obama than it has been under Trump. Three of the six types of pollutants identified by the Clean Air Act as toxic to human health were more prevalent in the air as of 2018 than they were before Trump took office, according to Environmental Protection Agency data.
Additionally, there were more "unhealthy air days" for sensitive groups in 2018 than in 2016 -- 799 days across the 35 American cities surveyed by the EPA, up from 702. Though there were significantly more "unhealthy air days" in Obama's first term than there have been in Trump's, the lowest amount of unhealthy air days -- 598 -- occurred in 2014 under Obama.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Voting for individuals who value and promote reading is a powerful way to shape the future of our society. The ability to name and discuss a range of books reflects a person's intellectual curiosity, empathy, and capacity for critical thinking. It signifies a deep appreciation for the written word and an understanding of the transformative power that literature holds.
When we elect leaders who can proudly share a list of books they have read, we are choosing individuals who recognize the immense value of knowledge and the importance of engaging with diverse perspectives. They understand that reading opens doors to worlds we may never experience firsthand, broadening our understanding of different cultures, histories, and ideas.
Books have the extraordinary ability to ignite our imagination, expand our empathy, and challenge our preconceptions. They offer solace in times of uncertainty, provoke thought, and inspire us to strive for a better society. When leaders embrace the power of literature, they show a commitment to personal growth, continuous learning, and the pursuit of wisdom.
By electing representatives who encourage reading, we send a resounding message that education, enlightenment, and critical thinking are integral to our collective progress. We show our belief in the power of ideas, the strength of empathy, and the importance of fostering a culture that values intellectual curiosity.
So let us vote for leaders who not only speak of the importance of reading but can passionately discuss the books that have shaped their lives. Let us choose those who understand that knowledge is a lifelong journey, and books are the compass guiding us towards a brighter, more compassionate future.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The revelations surrounding Rep. Lauren Boebert and the horrifying scandal that has engulfed her family are deeply distressing. It is an unsettling reminder that behind the public personas of politicians, there are personal lives that can be riddled with pain and suffering.
The details that have emerged are nothing short of heart-wrenching. The desperate 911 call made by Boebert's son, filled with anguish and fear, is a haunting testament to the alleged abuse he endured. The young boy's trembling voice, suffocated by tears, painted a terrifying picture of a father violently "throwing" him around their home. In those moments, his innocence and vulnerability were laid bare, as he confided, "He just does this to me so much."
But what unfolded next only intensified the gravity of the situation. Minutes after the initial call, when help was on its way, the boy dialed 911 again, retracting his accusations. The weight of such a decision can only be imagined, the fear and pressure that forced him to recant his plea for help. And alongside him on that call stood Lauren Boebert, her voice determined, insisting that her son "doesn't need help." The alleged attempt to cover up the abuse, to protect her political career, reveals a chilling side to her proclaimed "family values."
Now, Boebert attempts to salvage her public image, speaking of the safety and well-being of her family as the utmost priority. She claims to have taken action to ensure better days, while conveniently filing for divorce. Yet, her words ring hollow, as her actions betray the true nature of her motivations. The scars left by the abuse suffered by her son cannot be easily mended or swept under the rug.
As the spotlight turns to Jayson Boebert, the soon-to-be-ex-husband, his denial of any physical harm inflicted upon his son is met with skepticism. His troubled past, marred by despicable acts of public indecency and lewd behavior, casts a long shadow on his credibility. A man with such a disturbing history cannot be easily trusted to tell the truth. And the alleged release of his dogs on a process server, driven by extreme anger, only adds to the unsettling narrative surrounding him.
In the midst of this disheartening scandal, our hearts go out to the young boy, a victim of alleged abuse, and to all children who suffer in silence behind closed doors. Their pain, their voices must not be silenced or ignored. It is our duty to listen, to protect, and to fight for their well-being. We can only hope that justice is served, and that this harrowing chapter serves as a catalyst for change, shining a light on the importance of addressing domestic abuse and ensuring the safety of our children.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Here are some examples of voter suppression bills that have been passed by Republicans in various states:
Georgia: In 2021, Georgia passed SB 202, a bill that restricts absentee voting, limits ballot drop boxes, and criminalizes giving food and water to voters waiting in line, among other provisions.
Florida: In 2021, Florida passed SB 90, a bill that restricts access to drop boxes, adds new voter ID requirements for absentee ballots, and limits who can collect and submit ballots.
Texas: In 2021, Texas introduced SB 7, a bill that would have restricted early voting, eliminated drive-through voting, and added new ID requirements for absentee voting. The bill was ultimately blocked by Democratic lawmakers.
Arizona: In 2021, Arizona passed SB 1485, a bill that will remove voters from the permanent early voting list if they do not vote in two consecutive election cycles.
Iowa: In 2021, Iowa passed HF 590, a bill that shortens the early voting period, limits the use of drop boxes, and adds new ID requirements for absentee voting.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Trump Lie On Air quality
"We want to have the cleanest water on Earth. We want to have the cleanest air on Earth. Our numbers, as you saw -- we had record numbers come out very recently. Our numbers are very, very good -- our environmental numbers. Our water numbers, our -- our numbers on-air are tremendous...But we are doing better right now than we've ever done, in terms of cleanliness, in terms of numbers." -- January 22 press conference in Davos, Switzerland
Facts First: By several measures, US air was cleaner under Obama than it has been under Trump. Three of the six types of pollutants identified by the Clean Air Act as toxic to human health were more prevalent in the air as of 2018 than they were before Trump took office, according to Environmental Protection Agency data.
Additionally, there were more "unhealthy air days" for sensitive groups in 2018 than in 2016 -- 799 days across the 35 American cities surveyed by the EPA, up from 702. Though there were significantly more "unhealthy air days" in Obama's first term than there have been in Trump's, the lowest amount of unhealthy air days -- 598 -- occurred in 2014 under Obama.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
TRUMP,
the biggest Loser in political history,
Twice impeached,
convicted "Sexual Abuser",
80 + felony charges,
8 + indictments,
lost over 60 court cases,
in Red districts, Trump appointed judges,
Every state Certified Trump
lied, & lost & still, Republicans can't let go, lol.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
States that pre-ordered COVID vaccines for children:
AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY
States that refused:
FL
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In a stunning turn of events, the political landscape of Arizona was rocked as Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs courageously stepped forward to expose the deceit and betrayal orchestrated by her Republican predecessor, Doug Ducey. The revelation she unveiled was nothing short of a harrowing tale of corruption, a tale that would forever stain Ducey's legacy.
With unwavering determination, Hobbs fearlessly exposed Ducey's treachery, unveiling a shocking revelation that would shake the very foundation of the state. It was revealed that Ducey, the once-trusted leader, had callously misappropriated an astronomical sum of $50 million, funds that were intended to uplift the struggling citizens of Arizona. These funds had been provided by the federal government through the noble American Rescue Plan, a beacon of hope for a nation in crisis.
During the dark hours of Ducey's administration, when the curtain of accountability was thin and wavering, he covertly directed his state treasurer to carry out his audacious plan. With a cold-hearted disregard for the well-being of Arizona's public schools, Ducey orchestrated the siphoning away of funds meant to enrich the lives of countless students. The target of his insidious scheme? All-day kindergarten for parents who had chosen to send their children to private schools.
As the truth emerged from the shadows, it became abundantly clear that Ducey's actions were not simply an innocent misstep or an oversight. No, they were a calculated assault on the very heart of education, a deliberate strike against the foundation of Arizona's public schools. By diverting these vital resources to private institutions, Ducey maliciously weakened the already struggling public education system, leaving countless children without the opportunities they deserved.
Governor Hobbs, fueled by a righteous fury, stood before the people of Arizona and condemned Ducey's brazen transgression. Her words echoed through the halls of power, a resounding indictment of a man who had forsaken his duty and betrayed the trust of his constituents. She branded his actions as a flagrant violation of federal law and the sacred State Constitution, a violation that would forever mar the annals of Arizona's history.
With unwavering resolve, Governor Hobbs vowed to fight for the very soul of Arizona's education system, promising to protect the sacred institutions of public learning. She declared that no act of treachery, no matter how insidious, would deter her from championing the cause of the state's students. For she understood that the foundation of a prosperous future lay in the hands of those who had the power to shape young minds and unleash their full potential.
In her solemn pledge, Hobbs assured the citizens of Arizona that her administration would rise above the dark cloud of corruption, embracing the light of justice and accountability. She vowed to deploy the federal funds lawfully and equitably, ensuring that every Arizona student, regardless of their background or circumstances, would be given the education they deserved. For she knew that the future of the state rested on the shoulders of its youth, and she was determined to pave the way for their success.
As the dramatic revelation reverberated across Arizona and beyond, it left an indelible mark on the political landscape. The citizens were left to grapple with the truth, to question the moral fiber of their former leader. And as they looked to the future, their hope rested on the shoulders of Governor Katie Hobbs, a beacon of integrity in a sea of deception. For in the face of adversity, she would remain resolute, steadfastly fighting for the rights and opportunities of every Arizona student, and forever striving to restore honor to the tarnished halls of power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here are 20 lawsuits that have involved Donald Trump:
Trump University Lawsuit: In 2016, Trump settled a lawsuit brought by former students of Trump University, who alleged that the program defrauded them.
Summer Zervos Lawsuit: In 2017, former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos sued Trump for defamation, after he called her allegations of sexual assault "lies."
Emoluments Clause Lawsuits: Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Trump, alleging that he has violated the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution by accepting foreign payments through his businesses.
Trump Foundation Lawsuit: In 2018, the New York Attorney General sued the Trump Foundation, alleging that it had engaged in illegal political activity and self-dealing.
Stormy Daniels Lawsuit: In 2018, adult film actress Stormy Daniels sued Trump over a nondisclosure agreement related to their alleged affair.
E. Jean Carroll Lawsuit: In 2019, writer E. Jean Carroll sued Trump for defamation, after he denied her allegation that he sexually assaulted her in the 1990s.
Deutsche Bank and Capital One Lawsuit: In 2019, Trump sued Deutsche Bank and Capital One in an attempt to prevent them from complying with subpoenas for his financial records.
Mary Trump Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump's niece Mary Trump sued him and other family members, alleging that they had cheated her out of millions of dollars in inheritance.
Dominion Voting Systems Lawsuit: In 2021, Dominion Voting Systems filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump and other allies, alleging that they had spread false claims about the company and its role in the 2020 election.
National Association of Realtors Lawsuit: In 2021, the National Association of Realtors sued Trump's real estate company, alleging that it had violated antitrust laws by requiring brokers to use its services.
January 6th Lawsuits: Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Trump and others for their role in the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
Michael Cohen Lawsuit: In 2018, Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen sued him, alleging that Trump had failed to pay his legal fees and other expenses.
California Sanctuary State Lawsuit: In 2018, the Trump Administration sued California over its "sanctuary state" policies.
Greta Thunberg Lawsuit: In 2019, Trump mocked climate activist Greta Thunberg on Twitter, prompting her to file a lawsuit against him for harassment.
TikTok Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump attempted to ban the popular social media app TikTok, leading to a lawsuit filed by the company.
John Bolton Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton sued him over the publication of Bolton's memoir.
Pennsylvania Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump and his allies filed multiple lawsuits challenging the results of the presidential election in Pennsylvania.
Georgia Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump and his allies filed multiple lawsuits challenging the results of the presidential election in Georgia.
Michigan Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump and his allies filed multiple lawsuits challenging the results of the presidential election in Michigan.
Wisconsin Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump and his allies filed multiple lawsuits challenging the results of the presidential election in Wisconsin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@travisfoster1071 --- I guess you do not know why hospitals, police stations, post offices, fire stations, lamp posts, highways, street signs, traffic lights, alarm sirens, airports, bus stations, etc etc, exists, yeh??
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
FACE TO FACE:🏆 Barack Hussein Obama was able to secure the popular vote, whereas Trump was not. Additionally, Obama served two terms as the President of the United States, whereas Trump did not. Furthermore, Obama was honored with the prestigious Time Person of the Year award and was also awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Conversely, Trump did not receive these acknowledgments. Obama's achievements also include being granted the Profile Courage Award, winning a Grammy Award for Best-Spoken Word Album, and receiving a Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Narrator. On the contrary, Trump did not have these accomplishments. Moreover, Obama was recognized as the Financial Person of the Year and was given the notable King Abdulaziz Medal as well as the esteemed Phoenix Award. However, Trump did not receive any of these commendations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
BREAKING: New York Attorney General Letitia James brings down the hammer on her target Donald Trump seconds after stepping out of the Manhattan courthouse where his fraud trial is unfolding.
Refusing to hold back, James slammed the repeatedly indicted ex-president for constantly smearing her and the judge in this case, and said the attacks won't be enough to save him.
"Trump's comments were offensive, they were baseless," she told reporters.
"They were void of any facts and/or any evidence," she went on. "What they were, were comments that unfortunately fomented violence and comments that I would describe as race-baiting, and comments, unfortunately, that appeal to the bottom of our humanity."
"This case was brought simply because it was a case where individuals have engaged in a pattern and practice of fraud, and I will not sit idly by and allow anyone to subvert the law," she said.
The judge has already ruled on the most crucial element of the $250 million civil lawsuit and said that Trump did in fact fraud.
Now, we just wait to see how big of a defeat Trump is ultimately dealt. James has already won, it's just a matter of how big.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Imagine there are some really rich people called "Billionaires." Now, these Billionaires want to have a lot of people working for them quickly. But here's the problem: instead of treating people nicely and paying them for their work, they want to make them work like they don't have a choice. This is not a good thing at all.
They're thinking of getting these people from prisons. A prison is like a place where people who did something wrong are kept for a while. But it's important to remember that everyone makes mistakes, and it's not right to use people as if they were things.
These Billionaires believe that catching people who steal things is easy. They think that if someone takes something from a store without paying, it's simple to catch them. And out of all the types of thieves, they think shoplifters, who take things from stores, are the most common.
To catch these shoplifters, the Billionaires plan to use things in the store that are easy to steal. They think this will trick the shoplifters into taking them. This isn't nice either, because it's like setting a trap for someone.
They're also talking about putting small devices called "trackers" on the things in the store. These trackers can follow where things go. And they're saying that using these trackers is not expensive anymore.
Even scarier, they're saying that computers, like the ones that can think and learn like humans, can follow people from the store to their homes. This is not a good use of computers, and it's important to remember that everyone deserves privacy and to be safe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here is a list of some of the significant train derailments that occurred in the United States between 2015 and 2020:
May 12, 2015 - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Amtrak Train 188 derailed, killing 8 people and injuring more than 200 others.
March 5, 2017 - DuPont, Washington: Amtrak Train 501 derailed, killing 3 people and injuring more than 60 others.
April 3, 2018 - Cayce, South Carolina: Amtrak Train 91 collided with a parked CSX freight train, killing 2 people and injuring more than 100 others.
May 15, 2018 - Olney, Montana: A Montana Rail Link train derailed, spilling 39 cars and causing the evacuation of the nearby town due to a hazardous material leak.
December 18, 2019 - Seattle, Washington: An Amtrak train carrying more than 250 passengers derailed, causing several cars to fall onto the busy Interstate 5 below. No fatalities were reported, but several people were injured.
February 6, 2020 - Fort Worth, Texas: A Union Pacific train derailed and caught fire, causing the evacuation of nearby homes and businesses.
** Non of these events were visited by TRUMP during his administration **
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
People who believe that the 14th Amendment will automatically stop Trump from running in the 2024 election aren't explaining how this would really happen. That's because there isn't a clear way for it to work.
Even if Trump is found guilty of the things mentioned in the 14th Amendment, it would lead to a long legal fight over whether he should be taken off the ballot. States and counties that support Trump would go to court to keep him on the ballot. This legal back-and-forth could take years and end up in the Supreme Court, which isn't always predictable.
People who support this idea might get upset when others point out the difficulties. They might claim there's an easy way to use the 14th Amendment to get rid of Trump. But even if they realize it's not so simple, they might still complain that the 14th Amendment isn't useful if it can't be used how they want. They're treating it like a magic spell, which isn't how it works.
The good news is, if Trump is found guilty of a crime, he won't be a strong candidate in 2024, even if his party nominates him. His conviction will hurt his chances. We don't need the 14th Amendment like a magic spell to remove him from the ballot – it's not meant to be used that way.
Some people online act like the 14th Amendment is a magic solution to all this. They want attention and followers, so they keep talking about it. They act like they're the only ones who thought of it, even though it's not widely discussed. But in the real world, laws take time and effort to use properly – they're not magic.
If you wonder why someone isn't using the 14th Amendment to stop Trump, it's because they understand that laws are complex and can't be used like magic. They're more realistic about how things work, unlike those who just talk about it online.
In the end, Trump will likely be found guilty and go to prison. That will hurt his chances in the 2024 election. But it won't happen by using the 14th Amendment like a magic trick. The real world is more complicated than that, and legal experts know better than Twitter users.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
BREAKING: Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin drops bombshell, goes public with devastating evidence that proves that Trump and Rudy Giuliani, COMPLETELY made up their “bribery” accusations against President Biden regarding Ukrainian energy company Burisma.
Raskin revealed a devastating transcript of text messages sent by the founder of Burisma in which the founder answered Giuliani’s questions about Biden’s supposed “bribery scandal.” The founder’s responses were SO devastating to Giuliani and Trump’s phony scandal that Giuliani ended up “furious” with him — and decided to hide them from the public.
Here are the questions and the Burisma founder’s answers.
Question: Were you aware that Hunter Biden had met with State Department officials in both May 2015 (Blinken) and December 2015? What did you understand the purpose of those contacts were?
ANSWER: WE NEVER APPROVED OR ASKED HIM TO CONDUCT THOSE MEETINGS ON BEHALF OF BURISMA
Question: Did you ever learn why VP Joe Biden asked for Shokin to be fired as PG?
ANSWER: WE LEARNED ABOUT IT FROM NEWSPAPERS AND INTERNET. WE NEVER HAD CONTACTS WITH VP BIDEN DURING HIS VISITS TO UKRAINE.
Question: Please detail any contacts you had with VP Joe Biden and his office from 2013 through 2019. Did Hunter ever facilitate any of those contacts?
Discover related topics

ANSWER: NO ONE FROM BURISMA EVER HAD ANY CONTACTS WITH VP BIDEN OR PEOPLE WORKING FOR HIM DURING HUNTER BIDEN’S ENGAGEMENT.
Question: Did VP Biden or his staff assist you or your company in any way with business deals or meetings with world leaders or any other assistance?
ANSWER: NO
Question: Did you ever become aware of documents suggesting $900k was paid to Hunter Biden for “lobbying” his father?
ANSWER: NO
So there you have it, folks. Thanks to Congressman Raskin coming forward with these transcripts that were obtained by his House Oversight Committee, the American people can now read with their own eyes that President Biden did nothing wrong — and that this entire time, Trump, Giuliani, and the rest of the Republicans have been pushing nothing but Russian propaganda and hot air.
Adding insult to injury, many Republican members of Congress have demanded, and are STILL demanding, that President Biden be impeached over these phony Burisma “bribery” allegations.
Unfortunately for them, Congressman Raskin just put an end to their shameless plot to smear and impeach President Biden.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In a stunning turn of events, the political landscape of Arizona was rocked as Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs courageously stepped forward to expose the deceit and betrayal orchestrated by her Republican predecessor, Doug Ducey. The revelation she unveiled was nothing short of a harrowing tale of corruption, a tale that would forever stain Ducey's legacy.
With unwavering determination, Hobbs fearlessly exposed Ducey's treachery, unveiling a shocking revelation that would shake the very foundation of the state. It was revealed that Ducey, the once-trusted leader, had callously misappropriated an astronomical sum of $50 million, funds that were intended to uplift the struggling citizens of Arizona. These funds had been provided by the federal government through the noble American Rescue Plan, a beacon of hope for a nation in crisis.
During the dark hours of Ducey's administration, when the curtain of accountability was thin and wavering, he covertly directed his state treasurer to carry out his audacious plan. With a cold-hearted disregard for the well-being of Arizona's public schools, Ducey orchestrated the siphoning away of funds meant to enrich the lives of countless students. The target of his insidious scheme? All-day kindergarten for parents who had chosen to send their children to private schools.
As the truth emerged from the shadows, it became abundantly clear that Ducey's actions were not simply an innocent misstep or an oversight. No, they were a calculated assault on the very heart of education, a deliberate strike against the foundation of Arizona's public schools. By diverting these vital resources to private institutions, Ducey maliciously weakened the already struggling public education system, leaving countless children without the opportunities they deserved.
Governor Hobbs, fueled by a righteous fury, stood before the people of Arizona and condemned Ducey's brazen transgression. Her words echoed through the halls of power, a resounding indictment of a man who had forsaken his duty and betrayed the trust of his constituents. She branded his actions as a flagrant violation of federal law and the sacred State Constitution, a violation that would forever mar the annals of Arizona's history.
With unwavering resolve, Governor Hobbs vowed to fight for the very soul of Arizona's education system, promising to protect the sacred institutions of public learning. She declared that no act of treachery, no matter how insidious, would deter her from championing the cause of the state's students. For she understood that the foundation of a prosperous future lay in the hands of those who had the power to shape young minds and unleash their full potential.
In her solemn pledge, Hobbs assured the citizens of Arizona that her administration would rise above the dark cloud of corruption, embracing the light of justice and accountability. She vowed to deploy the federal funds lawfully and equitably, ensuring that every Arizona student, regardless of their background or circumstances, would be given the education they deserved. For she knew that the future of the state rested on the shoulders of its youth, and she was determined to pave the way for their success.
As the dramatic revelation reverberated across Arizona and beyond, it left an indelible mark on the political landscape. The citizens were left to grapple with the truth, to question the moral fiber of their former leader. And as they looked to the future, their hope rested on the shoulders of Governor Katie Hobbs, a beacon of integrity in a sea of deception. For in the face of adversity, she would remain resolute, steadfastly fighting for the rights and opportunities of every Arizona student, and forever striving to restore honor to the tarnished halls of power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here are 20 lawsuits that have involved Donald Trump:
Trump University Lawsuit: In 2016, Trump settled a lawsuit brought by former students of Trump University, who alleged that the program defrauded them.
Summer Zervos Lawsuit: In 2017, former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos sued Trump for defamation, after he called her allegations of sexual assault "lies."
Emoluments Clause Lawsuits: Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Trump, alleging that he has violated the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution by accepting foreign payments through his businesses.
Trump Foundation Lawsuit: In 2018, the New York Attorney General sued the Trump Foundation, alleging that it had engaged in illegal political activity and self-dealing.
Stormy Daniels Lawsuit: In 2018, adult film actress Stormy Daniels sued Trump over a nondisclosure agreement related to their alleged affair.
E. Jean Carroll Lawsuit: In 2019, writer E. Jean Carroll sued Trump for defamation, after he denied her allegation that he sexually assaulted her in the 1990s.
Deutsche Bank and Capital One Lawsuit: In 2019, Trump sued Deutsche Bank and Capital One in an attempt to prevent them from complying with subpoenas for his financial records.
Mary Trump Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump's niece Mary Trump sued him and other family members, alleging that they had cheated her out of millions of dollars in inheritance.
Dominion Voting Systems Lawsuit: In 2021, Dominion Voting Systems filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump and other allies, alleging that they had spread false claims about the company and its role in the 2020 election.
National Association of Realtors Lawsuit: In 2021, the National Association of Realtors sued Trump's real estate company, alleging that it had violated antitrust laws by requiring brokers to use its services.
January 6th Lawsuits: Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Trump and others for their role in the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
Michael Cohen Lawsuit: In 2018, Trump's former personal lawyer Michael Cohen sued him, alleging that Trump had failed to pay his legal fees and other expenses.
California Sanctuary State Lawsuit: In 2018, the Trump Administration sued California over its "sanctuary state" policies.
Greta Thunberg Lawsuit: In 2019, Trump mocked climate activist Greta Thunberg on Twitter, prompting her to file a lawsuit against him for harassment.
TikTok Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump attempted to ban the popular social media app TikTok, leading to a lawsuit filed by the company.
John Bolton Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton sued him over the publication of Bolton's memoir.
Pennsylvania Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump and his allies filed multiple lawsuits challenging the results of the presidential election in Pennsylvania.
Georgia Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump and his allies filed multiple lawsuits challenging the results of the presidential election in Georgia.
Michigan Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump and his allies filed multiple lawsuits challenging the results of the presidential election in Michigan.
Wisconsin Lawsuit: In 2020, Trump and his allies filed multiple lawsuits challenging the results of the presidential election in Wisconsin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Devastating news strikes Trump's realm,
ABC News reveals a bombshell at the helm.
A trusted adviser, confidant deep,
Accused of viewing a classified map, secrets to keep.
Susie Wiles, the person they name,
Running Trump's campaign, igniting the flame.
In Florida's past race, she led the way,
And helmed Trump's Save America PAC, they say.
Insult upon injury, a twist so severe,
ABC News suggests a trial may draw near.
Should it precede the 2024 election's ring,
Wiles may testify, her words echoing.
Special Counsel Jack Smith, his words unfold,
Trump's indictment revealed, a tale untold.
A classified map, a military affair,
Shared with Wiles, cautioning with care.
"Keep your distance," he warned, not to reveal,
The details he possessed, what he'd conceal.
ABC News reports, the story unfurled,
Trump's troubles deepen in this new world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In a stunning turn of events, the trial date for the criminal case filed against former President Donald Trump in New York has been officially set by the judge. The courtroom drama is scheduled to commence on March 25, 2024, and there is an unequivocal mandate that Trump must be physically present throughout the proceedings. The timing of this trial is nothing short of remarkable, as it coincides precisely with the heart of the fiercely competitive presidential primary season.
With the weight of the criminal case hanging over his head, Trump finds himself in a uniquely challenging position. The judge's stern ruling prohibits him from making any commitments or scheduling any engagements that could potentially clash with the trial. The stage is set for an intense legal battle that threatens to captivate the nation and reshape the political landscape.
As the spotlight shines on the courtroom, all eyes will be on the former president as he confronts the charges leveled against him. The stakes couldn't be higher, as the outcome of this trial has the potential to reverberate far beyond the confines of the courtroom walls, shaking the very foundations of the political sphere.
In this high-stakes clash of legal prowess and political ambition, the nation braces itself for a spectacle that will test the boundaries of justice and power. The courtroom doors swing open, and the drama begins to unfold. The world watches with bated breath as the fate of Donald Trump hangs in the balance, and the turbulent currents of the presidential race converge with the pursuit of truth and accountability.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis faces a devastating blow as Penguin Random House, a national book publisher, unleashes an earth-shattering federal lawsuit against a Florida school district. The lawsuit, of monumental proportions, accuses DeSantis and the district of heinously violating the sacred principles of the First Amendment by mercilessly expunging 10 "woke" books from the hallowed shelves of knowledge.
With thundering fury, Penguin Random House condemns DeSantis and the school district for their abhorrent actions, asserting that they have desecrated the very essence of democracy and trampled upon our hallowed Constitutional rights. In a statement seething with righteous indignation, Nihar Malaviya, the indomitable CEO of Penguin Random House, proclaims that books possess the power to ignite transformative change, especially in the hearts and minds of students. Thus, depriving them of an equitable exposure to diverse perspectives is a dire offense, a chilling form of censorship that menaces the very fabric of our nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
DeSantis, trembling with fear, dare not utter the name of Trump, the towering figure of his own party. His cowardice knows no bounds as he cowers in the shadow of the former President, unable to muster the courage to even speak his name.
Pence, a meek soul, quivered in trepidation, lacking the fortitude to testify against the very person he served. In the face of a critical moment, he wilted, paralyzed by fear, abandoning the principles he once claimed to uphold.
Nikki Haley, a timid figure, shrank back from the opportunity to condemn Trump, bowing to the pressure of political expediency. In her feeble attempt to preserve her own ambitions, she betrayed the very values she once professed, forsaking her moral compass.
Ted Cruz, a spineless individual, crumbled when it came to defending his own wife against the man he had pledged loyalty to. Consumed by self-preservation, he abandoned any semblance of integrity, leaving his wife vulnerable in the wake of his fear.
All of these pathetic cowards, devoid of true bravery, audaciously believe they possess the qualities necessary to hold the highest office in the land. Yet, their actions reveal the depths of their cowardice, rendering them unworthy of such a noble and formidable responsibility.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
FACE TO FACE:🏆 Barack Hussein Obama was able to secure the popular vote, whereas Trump was not. Additionally, Obama served two terms as the President of the United States, whereas Trump did not. Furthermore, Obama was honored with the prestigious Time Person of the Year award and was also awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Conversely, Trump did not receive these acknowledgments. Obama's achievements also include being granted the Profile Courage Award, winning a Grammy Award for Best-Spoken Word Album, and receiving a Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Narrator. On the contrary, Trump did not have these accomplishments. Moreover, Obama was recognized as the Financial Person of the Year and was given the notable King Abdulaziz Medal as well as the esteemed Phoenix Award. However, Trump did not receive any of these commendations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
News Flash: Donald Trump appears to have run afoul of federal statutes by acquiring a Glock semiautomatic pistol in South Carolina, a move prohibited by his felony indictment.
This situation has the potential to escalate into a significant predicament for the former president.
Trump's close associate, Steven Cheung, publicly shared a video capturing Trump's presence inside a firearms retail establishment, where he was seen handling the aforementioned lethal firearm. Cheung even took pride in announcing Trump's intent to purchase the weapon.
In the recording, Trump can be observed expressing his admiration for the Glock, articulating, "I aspire to procure one, I shall acquire one. No, I ardently desire to possess one. I am resolute about obtaining one."
Subsequently, Trump participated in additional photographic sessions, all the while expressing his enthusiasm, stating, "Is it not commendable that Glock is an exceptional firearm?"
In a rather astonishing twist, Trump found himself in the company of South Carolina's MAGA-endorsed Attorney General, Alan Wilson, who curiously refrained from apprising Trump of the legal restrictions against his gun acquisition.
Though it remains uncertain whether Trump indeed consummated the purchase, his flagrant disregard for legal constraints certainly raises the specter of such a transaction. It is imperative that law enforcement authorities commence an immediate inquiry into this matter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Trump Lie On Air quality
"We want to have the cleanest water on Earth. We want to have the cleanest air on Earth. Our numbers, as you saw -- we had record numbers come out very recently. Our numbers are very, very good -- our environmental numbers. Our water numbers, our -- our numbers on-air are tremendous...But we are doing better right now than we've ever done, in terms of cleanliness, in terms of numbers." -- January 22 press conference in Davos, Switzerland
Facts First: By several measures, US air was cleaner under Obama than it has been under Trump. Three of the six types of pollutants identified by the Clean Air Act as toxic to human health were more prevalent in the air as of 2018 than they were before Trump took office, according to Environmental Protection Agency data.
Additionally, there were more "unhealthy air days" for sensitive groups in 2018 than in 2016 -- 799 days across the 35 American cities surveyed by the EPA, up from 702. Though there were significantly more "unhealthy air days" in Obama's first term than there have been in Trump's, the lowest amount of unhealthy air days -- 598 -- occurred in 2014 under Obama.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Title: Fiery Exchange: Criticism of Jim Jordan's Stance on FBI Investigation
A recent confrontation involving Jim Jordan's complaints about the treatment of former President Trump by the FBI took a dramatic turn. Jordan, who was questioning the fairness of the investigation, faced a biting response when reminded that he had not passed the bar exam after law school, labeling him an "ignorant joke."
The exchange intensified as Jordan tweeted a warning about the FBI's capabilities, only to be dismantled by Democratic candidate John Burrows. Burrows emphasized the principle of equal treatment under the law, asserting that it applies to everyone, whether they are a former president or, in this case, someone comparable to the "town idiot."
Ironically, Burrows then acknowledged that Jordan was correct about the law treating presidential candidates like any other citizen. However, he highlighted the potential consequences of non-compliance with government requests, disregarding subpoenas, and mishandling classified information. A jab was also thrown at Jordan regarding his alleged negligence in addressing cases of sexual abuse.
The exchange concluded with a scathing remark, suggesting that someone vigorously shielding Trump from his alleged criminality should not be a part of the judiciary committee. The exchange left Jordan seemingly wounded, prompting the need for metaphorical "ointment" to soothe the burn.
The question remains: Should someone who shows considerable effort to protect Trump from his legal issues be removed from the judiciary committee?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In a stunning turn of events, the trial date for the criminal case filed against former President Donald Trump in New York has been officially set by the judge. The courtroom drama is scheduled to commence on March 25, 2024, and there is an unequivocal mandate that Trump must be physically present throughout the proceedings. The timing of this trial is nothing short of remarkable, as it coincides precisely with the heart of the fiercely competitive presidential primary season.
With the weight of the criminal case hanging over his head, Trump finds himself in a uniquely challenging position. The judge's stern ruling prohibits him from making any commitments or scheduling any engagements that could potentially clash with the trial. The stage is set for an intense legal battle that threatens to captivate the nation and reshape the political landscape.
As the spotlight shines on the courtroom, all eyes will be on the former president as he confronts the charges leveled against him. The stakes couldn't be higher, as the outcome of this trial has the potential to reverberate far beyond the confines of the courtroom walls, shaking the very foundations of the political sphere.
In this high-stakes clash of legal prowess and political ambition, the nation braces itself for a spectacle that will test the boundaries of justice and power. The courtroom doors swing open, and the drama begins to unfold. The world watches with bated breath as the fate of Donald Trump hangs in the balance, and the turbulent currents of the presidential race converge with the pursuit of truth and accountability.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Trump Lie On Immigration and the border
US-Mexico border
Trump said his administration has taken an "unprecedented effort" to secure the US-Mexico border.
Facts First: While it's unclear what measures Trump is specifically referencing when he says "unprecedented effort," his administration has taken some steps previous administrations haven't and officials have credited those measures with having reduced the influx of migrants into the US.
Still, crossings at the southern border remain and many of the policies put forth by the Trump administration have resulted in prolonged court challenges.
In the last fiscal year, Border Patrol arrested more than 851,000 people trying to cross the southern border, leading to overcrowding in border facilities and straining the administration's resources. Since then, border arrests have declined, but they remain high. Last December, for example, Border Patrol arrested 32,858 people.
Over the last year, the Trump administration has rolled out a series of policies to curtail the flow of asylum seekers to the border, such as the so-called "remain in Mexico policy." Forcing migrants, many of whom are from Central America, to Mexico marks an unprecedented shift in US asylum policy. Instead of living in the US as they work their way through the immigration court process, migrants are required to stay in Mexico, under the policy formally known as the Migrant Protection Protocols.
Despite ongoing legal challenges, a federal appeals court allowed the policy to continue. Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Heather Swift has called the policy "an effective tool to address the ongoing crisis at the southwest border," echoing similar praise from other administration officials.
— Priscilla Alvarez
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
BREAKING: Donald Trump unleashes an unhinged rant attacking New York Attorney General Letitia James as he arrives at the courtroom today for New York’s fraud trial against him.
Trump declared, “I just arrived at the Witch Hunt Trial taking place in the very badly failing (so sadly!) State of New York, where people and companies are fleeing by the thousands. Corrupt Attorney General, Letitia James, is a big reason for this. Statute 63(12) is meant to be used for Consumer Fraud. It has never been used before on a “case” such as this, especially since I did absolutely nothing wrong. I borrowed money, paid it back, in full, and got sued, years later, with a trial RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF MY CAMPAIGN. I am not even entitled, under any circumstances, to a JURY. This Witch Hunt cannot be allowed to continue. It is Election Interference and the start of Communism right here in America!”
Of course, Donald Trump conveniently left out the fact that the New York economy is roaring — and it’s population is continuing to boom.
He also forgot to mention that he’s not being tried “in the middle” of his campaign — the fact is that Trump himself chose to run for president even though he knew full-well that he would be running in the middle of several cases and trials — including Attorney General Letitia James’ fraud case against him and his children.
Last, but not least, he accused Letitia James of being a communist, when he is the one who goes out of his way to suck up to communist dictators such as North Korea’s Kim Jong and Russia’s Vladimir Putin — who spent decades as one of the top agents of the communist Soviet KGB.
Clearly, Trump is lashing out and projecting because he knows that Attorney General Letitia James already beat him to a pulp, and now the only thing left to determine is how many hundreds of millions in fines the Trump Organization will have to pay — or if it even will be allowed to continue to exist and operate.
Trump finally met his match in Attorney General Letitia James, so all he can do is launch delusional personal attacks against her in a desperate effort to save face with his most rabid, ignorant supporters.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis faces a devastating blow as Penguin Random House, a national book publisher, unleashes an earth-shattering federal lawsuit against a Florida school district. The lawsuit, of monumental proportions, accuses DeSantis and the district of heinously violating the sacred principles of the First Amendment by mercilessly expunging 10 "woke" books from the hallowed shelves of knowledge.
With thundering fury, Penguin Random House condemns DeSantis and the school district for their abhorrent actions, asserting that they have desecrated the very essence of democracy and trampled upon our hallowed Constitutional rights. In a statement seething with righteous indignation, Nihar Malaviya, the indomitable CEO of Penguin Random House, proclaims that books possess the power to ignite transformative change, especially in the hearts and minds of students. Thus, depriving them of an equitable exposure to diverse perspectives is a dire offense, a chilling form of censorship that menaces the very fabric of our nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
BREAKING: Republican 2024 presidential candidate Donald Trump loses it, throws a humiliating courtroom hissy-fit at his New York fraud trial after remaining uncharacteristically quiet during the first two days of trial.
It all started when the Judge Arthur Engoron declared that certain formalities can be ignored because there is no jury in Trump’s trial.
At this point, courtroom reporters say that Trump “began to grumble and angrily folded his arms while staring at the judge” and then “turned to defense lawyer Alina Habba,” loudly groaned, and exclaimed, “No jury!”
Then, Trump “threw his arms up in disgust and shook his head” as Judge Engoron looked on in disbelief, because, as he noted yesterday and the day before, it was Trump himself who decided to be tried by a judge instead of a jury.
Trump is clearly furious that he lost the case and he’s in serious danger of losing his business and going bankrupt, and now he’s desperately trying to save face with his cult.
Tick-tock, Donnie…
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Trump Lie On Air quality
"We want to have the cleanest water on Earth. We want to have the cleanest air on Earth. Our numbers, as you saw -- we had record numbers come out very recently. Our numbers are very, very good -- our environmental numbers. Our water numbers, our -- our numbers on-air are tremendous...But we are doing better right now than we've ever done, in terms of cleanliness, in terms of numbers." -- January 22 press conference in Davos, Switzerland
Facts First: By several measures, US air was cleaner under Obama than it has been under Trump. Three of the six types of pollutants identified by the Clean Air Act as toxic to human health were more prevalent in the air as of 2018 than they were before Trump took office, according to Environmental Protection Agency data.
Additionally, there were more "unhealthy air days" for sensitive groups in 2018 than in 2016 -- 799 days across the 35 American cities surveyed by the EPA, up from 702. Though there were significantly more "unhealthy air days" in Obama's first term than there have been in Trump's, the lowest amount of unhealthy air days -- 598 -- occurred in 2014 under Obama.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The revelations surrounding Rep. Lauren Boebert and the horrifying scandal that has engulfed her family are deeply distressing. It is an unsettling reminder that behind the public personas of politicians, there are personal lives that can be riddled with pain and suffering.
The details that have emerged are nothing short of heart-wrenching. The desperate 911 call made by Boebert's son, filled with anguish and fear, is a haunting testament to the alleged abuse he endured. The young boy's trembling voice, suffocated by tears, painted a terrifying picture of a father violently "throwing" him around their home. In those moments, his innocence and vulnerability were laid bare, as he confided, "He just does this to me so much."
But what unfolded next only intensified the gravity of the situation. Minutes after the initial call, when help was on its way, the boy dialed 911 again, retracting his accusations. The weight of such a decision can only be imagined, the fear and pressure that forced him to recant his plea for help. And alongside him on that call stood Lauren Boebert, her voice determined, insisting that her son "doesn't need help." The alleged attempt to cover up the abuse, to protect her political career, reveals a chilling side to her proclaimed "family values."
Now, Boebert attempts to salvage her public image, speaking of the safety and well-being of her family as the utmost priority. She claims to have taken action to ensure better days, while conveniently filing for divorce. Yet, her words ring hollow, as her actions betray the true nature of her motivations. The scars left by the abuse suffered by her son cannot be easily mended or swept under the rug.
As the spotlight turns to Jayson Boebert, the soon-to-be-ex-husband, his denial of any physical harm inflicted upon his son is met with skepticism. His troubled past, marred by despicable acts of public indecency and lewd behavior, casts a long shadow on his credibility. A man with such a disturbing history cannot be easily trusted to tell the truth. And the alleged release of his dogs on a process server, driven by extreme anger, only adds to the unsettling narrative surrounding him.
In the midst of this disheartening scandal, our hearts go out to the young boy, a victim of alleged abuse, and to all children who suffer in silence behind closed doors. Their pain, their voices must not be silenced or ignored. It is our duty to listen, to protect, and to fight for their well-being. We can only hope that justice is served, and that this harrowing chapter serves as a catalyst for change, shining a light on the importance of addressing domestic abuse and ensuring the safety of our children.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In an intriguing turn of events, Ron DeSantis finds himself in a state of utter dismay following a reporter's polite inquiry regarding his avoidance of voter questions during a campaign event.
The governor, known for his ardent support of the MAGA movement, visibly transforms from a composed politician to an enraged individual, reminiscent of a masked serial killer's hidden nature being unveiled.
With a sharp tone, he retorts at the reporter, questioning their comprehension, and intensifies his inquiry by repeating the words, "Are you blind? Are you blind!?" His aggressive demeanor, coupled with a close physical proximity, adds a palpable tension to the encounter.
This brief but significant incident is captured on camera, shedding light on the fragile disposition of Ron DeSantis. If he struggles to maintain composure while addressing mild inquiries, the pressing question arises: can he be entrusted with the immense responsibility that comes with access to the nuclear button?
Perhaps the governor's perpetually sour temperament can be attributed to his recent blunder in unveiling his campaign on Twitter, resulting in a significant decline in his polling numbers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Pink Flamingo When Trump fired the whistleblower; an active duty purple heart recipient from the White House Lt. Col. Vindman, Putin benefitted
When the GOP (except for Mitt Romney) voted to keep Trump as president even if they all believed him to be guilty, Putin Benefitted
When Trump has met Putin 16 times and has not met the Ukraine president even once, Putin benefitted.
When Trump ordered the Killing of an Iranian General on Iraq soil; Iraq may be forced to push the USA away off its land, Benefitting Iran and Putin.
When Trump withheld military aid/assistance to Ukraine (causing Ukrainians soldiers to die every day from the hands of Russian soldiers); Putin benefitted.
When Trump defends the Saudi prince after a mass shooting in Florida by one of his Saudi AirForce soldiers, Putin benefitted
When Trump pardons a racist war criminal and forced to retire an honorable Secretary of the Navy, Putin benefitted
When Trump didn’t take action after he was cautioned that the Ukraine scheme
(withholding military aid) was a blessing to Russia; Putin benefitted.
When Trump uses Rudy Giuliani instead of a real Ambassador to officiate foreign policies
to that country, Putin benefitted.
When Trump ignored helping Venezuela during their national crisis, Putin benefitted.
When Trump relieved career ambassadors and replaced them with inexperienced “bribing”
loyalists, Putin benefitted.
When Trump left our Kurdish allies alone to fend for themselves against Turkey. Putin benefitted.
When Trump blames Ukraine for the 2016 elections hack, Putin benefitted.
When Trump declared the Chinese company Huawei as a National Security Threat, local businesses that use cheaper Huawei technology for security applications had to spend more on replacing all their equipment; Putin benefitted since most of Huawei’s parts are from the USA. Now China is buying parts from other countries including Russia leaving our manufacturers behind to go bankrupt.
When Trump invited Russian oligarchs into the White House as his first guests. Putin Benefitted.
When Trump said NATO is obsolete; Putin benefitted.
When Trump left the Iran Nuclear deal treaty, Putin benefitted.
When Trump withdraws from the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, Putin benefitted.
When Trump raised tariffs to China, Putin benefitted
When Trump left the US bases by the Turkey/Syria border, Putin benefitted.
When Trump stopped military exercises with the South Koreans, North Korea, and Putin benefitted.
When Trump sells patriot missiles to Turkey that also buys weapons from Russia, Putin benefitted.
When Trump shook hands with the Saudi Prince and Turkey president, Putin benefitted. All roads lead to Putin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Trump Lie On Immigration and the border
US-Mexico border
Trump said his administration has taken an "unprecedented effort" to secure the US-Mexico border.
Facts First: While it's unclear what measures Trump is specifically referencing when he says "unprecedented effort," his administration has taken some steps previous administrations haven't and officials have credited those measures with having reduced the influx of migrants into the US.
Still, crossings at the southern border remain and many of the policies put forth by the Trump administration have resulted in prolonged court challenges.
In the last fiscal year, Border Patrol arrested more than 851,000 people trying to cross the southern border, leading to overcrowding in border facilities and straining the administration's resources. Since then, border arrests have declined, but they remain high. Last December, for example, Border Patrol arrested 32,858 people.
Over the last year, the Trump administration has rolled out a series of policies to curtail the flow of asylum seekers to the border, such as the so-called "remain in Mexico policy." Forcing migrants, many of whom are from Central America, to Mexico marks an unprecedented shift in US asylum policy. Instead of living in the US as they work their way through the immigration court process, migrants are required to stay in Mexico, under the policy formally known as the Migrant Protection Protocols.
Despite ongoing legal challenges, a federal appeals court allowed the policy to continue. Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Heather Swift has called the policy "an effective tool to address the ongoing crisis at the southwest border," echoing similar praise from other administration officials.
— Priscilla Alvarez
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Devastating news strikes Trump's realm,
ABC News reveals a bombshell at the helm.
A trusted adviser, confidant deep,
Accused of viewing a classified map, secrets to keep.
Susie Wiles, the person they name,
Running Trump's campaign, igniting the flame.
In Florida's past race, she led the way,
And helmed Trump's Save America PAC, they say.
Insult upon injury, a twist so severe,
ABC News suggests a trial may draw near.
Should it precede the 2024 election's ring,
Wiles may testify, her words echoing.
Special Counsel Jack Smith, his words unfold,
Trump's indictment revealed, a tale untold.
A classified map, a military affair,
Shared with Wiles, cautioning with care.
"Keep your distance," he warned, not to reveal,
The details he possessed, what he'd conceal.
ABC News reports, the story unfurled,
Trump's troubles deepen in this new world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Pink Flamingo When Trump fired the whistleblower; an active duty purple heart recipient from the White House Lt. Col. Vindman, Putin benefitted
When the GOP (except for Mitt Romney) voted to keep Trump as president even if they all believed him to be guilty, Putin Benefitted
When Trump has met Putin 16 times and has not met the Ukraine president even once, Putin benefitted.
When Trump ordered the Killing of an Iranian General on Iraq soil; Iraq may be forced to push the USA away off its land, Benefitting Iran and Putin.
When Trump withheld military aid/assistance to Ukraine (causing Ukrainians soldiers to die every day from the hands of Russian soldiers); Putin benefitted.
When Trump defends the Saudi prince after a mass shooting in Florida by one of his Saudi AirForce soldiers, Putin benefitted
When Trump pardons a racist war criminal and forced to retire an honorable Secretary of the Navy, Putin benefitted
When Trump didn’t take action after he was cautioned that the Ukraine scheme
(withholding military aid) was a blessing to Russia; Putin benefitted.
When Trump uses Rudy Giuliani instead of a real Ambassador to officiate foreign policies
to that country, Putin benefitted.
When Trump ignored helping Venezuela during their national crisis, Putin benefitted.
When Trump relieved career ambassadors and replaced them with inexperienced “bribing”
loyalists, Putin benefitted.
When Trump left our Kurdish allies alone to fend for themselves against Turkey. Putin benefitted.
When Trump blames Ukraine for the 2016 elections hack, Putin benefitted.
When Trump declared the Chinese company Huawei as a National Security Threat, local businesses that use cheaper Huawei technology for security applications had to spend more on replacing all their equipment; Putin benefitted since most of Huawei’s parts are from the USA. Now China is buying parts from other countries including Russia leaving our manufacturers behind to go bankrupt.
When Trump invited Russian oligarchs into the White House as his first guests. Putin Benefitted.
When Trump said NATO is obsolete; Putin benefitted.
When Trump left the Iran Nuclear deal treaty, Putin benefitted.
When Trump withdraws from the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, Putin benefitted.
When Trump raised tariffs to China, Putin benefitted
When Trump left the US bases by the Turkey/Syria border, Putin benefitted.
When Trump stopped military exercises with the South Koreans, North Korea, and Putin benefitted.
When Trump sells patriot missiles to Turkey that also buys weapons from Russia, Putin benefitted.
When Trump shook hands with the Saudi Prince and Turkey president, Putin benefitted. All roads lead to Putin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In a stunning turn of events, the trial date for the criminal case filed against former President Donald Trump in New York has been officially set by the judge. The courtroom drama is scheduled to commence on March 25, 2024, and there is an unequivocal mandate that Trump must be physically present throughout the proceedings. The timing of this trial is nothing short of remarkable, as it coincides precisely with the heart of the fiercely competitive presidential primary season.
With the weight of the criminal case hanging over his head, Trump finds himself in a uniquely challenging position. The judge's stern ruling prohibits him from making any commitments or scheduling any engagements that could potentially clash with the trial. The stage is set for an intense legal battle that threatens to captivate the nation and reshape the political landscape.
As the spotlight shines on the courtroom, all eyes will be on the former president as he confronts the charges leveled against him. The stakes couldn't be higher, as the outcome of this trial has the potential to reverberate far beyond the confines of the courtroom walls, shaking the very foundations of the political sphere.
In this high-stakes clash of legal prowess and political ambition, the nation braces itself for a spectacle that will test the boundaries of justice and power. The courtroom doors swing open, and the drama begins to unfold. The world watches with bated breath as the fate of Donald Trump hangs in the balance, and the turbulent currents of the presidential race converge with the pursuit of truth and accountability.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In the grand tapestry of events, a single thread unwinds,
A sequence of actions, where destiny binds.
President Biden's ascent, a turning tide,
And as Trump faltered, fate's path did collide.
With Trump's defeat, a seismic shift ensued,
NATO, emboldened, emerged renewed.
A shield of strength, united and tall,
Guarding against chaos, standing firm for all.
Ukraine, once teetering on a precipice's edge,
Found respite, a shield from the tempest's dredge.
The dominos paused, refusing to fall,
As hope prevailed, securing Ukraine's call.
Russia, a behemoth, now in disarray,
As consequences of their actions held sway.
The power they wielded, now shaken, unhinged,
A nation bewildered, the bear's mighty singed.
In the corridors of the Kremlin, unease unfurls,
As Putin, once confident, now in turmoil whirls.
President Biden, catalyst of change,
Evoking anxiety, causing Putin to estrange.
For in this grand tapestry, interwoven and vast,
The actions of leaders can shape our contrast.
And as history unravels, we witness the tale,
Of how one's choices can make the mighty prevail.
Because of President Biden's course and might,
Trump's loss ignited a chain, shining bright.
A cascade of events, a dance of fate,
Leaving an indelible mark, a world to reevaluate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In a realm of political storms, a tempest brews,
As devastating news descends upon Trump's views.
Voting rights organizations, united in their plea,
Demand his removal from the 2024 ballot, you see.
Like a fierce gust of wind, the letter arrives,
Addressed to Nevada's Secretary, it strives
To expose Trump's deeds, with words sharp and bold,
Unveiling a truth that cannot be controlled.
"Mr. Trump's conduct," they declare with resolve,
Encouraging the "Big Lie," causing the nation to dissolve.
An insurrection orchestrated, its toll so deadly,
And yet he refused to intervene, heedlessly.
His fingertips stained with power, he stood in command,
While the Capitol was besieged, his subordinates disband.
Blocking aid, the National Guard's noble might,
As chaos unfolded, shrouding that fateful night.
Such transgressions, they proclaim, render him unfit,
For any federal office, his presence to omit.
The presidency, a position he aspires to reclaim,
But these demands for justice ignite a fierce flame.
Let these words echo through every state's hall,
A resounding call for truth, as justice befalls.
For the fabric of democracy, it must be defended,
To safeguard the future, a nation transcended.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In a stunning turn of events, the trial date for the criminal case filed against former President Donald Trump in New York has been officially set by the judge. The courtroom drama is scheduled to commence on March 25, 2024, and there is an unequivocal mandate that Trump must be physically present throughout the proceedings. The timing of this trial is nothing short of remarkable, as it coincides precisely with the heart of the fiercely competitive presidential primary season.
With the weight of the criminal case hanging over his head, Trump finds himself in a uniquely challenging position. The judge's stern ruling prohibits him from making any commitments or scheduling any engagements that could potentially clash with the trial. The stage is set for an intense legal battle that threatens to captivate the nation and reshape the political landscape.
As the spotlight shines on the courtroom, all eyes will be on the former president as he confronts the charges leveled against him. The stakes couldn't be higher, as the outcome of this trial has the potential to reverberate far beyond the confines of the courtroom walls, shaking the very foundations of the political sphere.
In this high-stakes clash of legal prowess and political ambition, the nation braces itself for a spectacle that will test the boundaries of justice and power. The courtroom doors swing open, and the drama begins to unfold. The world watches with bated breath as the fate of Donald Trump hangs in the balance, and the turbulent currents of the presidential race converge with the pursuit of truth and accountability.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter, faced another blow as the Trust and Safety chief of the platform, responsible for moderating hateful content, resigned in disgust over Musk's recent transphobic actions. The incident unfolded when Musk extended an invitation to his transphobic associate, Matt Walsh, to host a highly offensive documentary titled "What is a Woman" on Twitter. This documentary is filled with transphobic attacks and misleading information, and it was part of a new agreement Twitter had just signed with the far-right "news" outlet, The Daily Wire.
Upon reviewing the video, Twitter's Trust and Safety Chief, Ella Erwin, and her team of content moderators decided to intervene and block Walsh from hosting the video on the platform. However, instead of supporting the decision made by Twitter's content moderation team, Elon Musk publicly criticized them, throwing them under the bus and stating that, "This was a mistake by many people at Twitter."
This disheartening defense of a hateful and transphobic video prompted Trust and Safety Chief Ella Irwin to promptly resign, highlighting Musk's alarming stance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Voting for individuals who value and promote reading is a powerful way to shape the future of our society. The ability to name and discuss a range of books reflects a person's intellectual curiosity, empathy, and capacity for critical thinking. It signifies a deep appreciation for the written word and an understanding of the transformative power that literature holds.
When we elect leaders who can proudly share a list of books they have read, we are choosing individuals who recognize the immense value of knowledge and the importance of engaging with diverse perspectives. They understand that reading opens doors to worlds we may never experience firsthand, broadening our understanding of different cultures, histories, and ideas.
Books have the extraordinary ability to ignite our imagination, expand our empathy, and challenge our preconceptions. They offer solace in times of uncertainty, provoke thought, and inspire us to strive for a better society. When leaders embrace the power of literature, they show a commitment to personal growth, continuous learning, and the pursuit of wisdom.
By electing representatives who encourage reading, we send a resounding message that education, enlightenment, and critical thinking are integral to our collective progress. We show our belief in the power of ideas, the strength of empathy, and the importance of fostering a culture that values intellectual curiosity.
So let us vote for leaders who not only speak of the importance of reading but can passionately discuss the books that have shaped their lives. Let us choose those who understand that knowledge is a lifelong journey, and books are the compass guiding us towards a brighter, more compassionate future.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The
Trump Lie On Immigration and the border
US-Mexico border
Trump said
his administration has taken an "unprecedented effort" to secure the
US-Mexico border.
Facts First: While it's unclear what measures Trump is
specifically referencing when he says "unprecedented effort," his
administration has taken some steps previous administrations haven't and
officials have credited those measures with having reduced the influx of
migrants into the US.
Still,
crossings at the southern border remain and many of the policies put forth by
the Trump administration have resulted in prolonged court challenges.
In the last
fiscal year, Border Patrol arrested more than 851,000 people trying to cross
the southern border, leading to overcrowding in border facilities and straining
the administration's resources. Since then, border arrests have declined,
but they remain high. Last December, for example, Border Patrol arrested 32,858
people.
Over the
last year, the Trump administration has rolled out a series of policies to
curtail the flow of asylum seekers to the border, such as the so-called
"remain in Mexico policy." Forcing migrants, many of whom are from
Central America, to Mexico marks an unprecedented shift in US asylum policy.
Instead of living in the US as they work their way through the immigration court
process, migrants are required to stay in Mexico, under the policy formally
known as the Migrant
Protection Protocols.
Despite
ongoing legal challenges, a federal appeals court allowed the policy to
continue. Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Heather Swift has called the
policy "an effective tool to address the ongoing crisis at
the southwest border," echoing similar praise from other administration
officials.
— Priscilla Alvarez
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
U.S. DEATHS, PEARL HARBOR, 7 DEC 1941: 2,403
U.S. DEATHS, COVID, 1 DEC 2020: 2,473
U.S. DEATHS, COVID, 2 DEC 2020: 2,733
U.S. DEATHS, COVID, 3 DEC 2020: 2,706
U.S. DEATHS, COVID, 4 DEC 2020: 2,563
U.S. DEATHS, COVID, 5 DEC 2020: 2,445
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis faces a devastating blow as Penguin Random House, a national book publisher, unleashes an earth-shattering federal lawsuit against a Florida school district. The lawsuit, of monumental proportions, accuses DeSantis and the district of heinously violating the sacred principles of the First Amendment by mercilessly expunging 10 "woke" books from the hallowed shelves of knowledge.
With thundering fury, Penguin Random House condemns DeSantis and the school district for their abhorrent actions, asserting that they have desecrated the very essence of democracy and trampled upon our hallowed Constitutional rights. In a statement seething with righteous indignation, Nihar Malaviya, the indomitable CEO of Penguin Random House, proclaims that books possess the power to ignite transformative change, especially in the hearts and minds of students. Thus, depriving them of an equitable exposure to diverse perspectives is a dire offense, a chilling form of censorship that menaces the very fabric of our nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In an intriguing turn of events, Ron DeSantis finds himself in a state of utter dismay following a reporter's polite inquiry regarding his avoidance of voter questions during a campaign event.
The governor, known for his ardent support of the MAGA movement, visibly transforms from a composed politician to an enraged individual, reminiscent of a masked serial killer's hidden nature being unveiled.
With a sharp tone, he retorts at the reporter, questioning their comprehension, and intensifies his inquiry by repeating the words, "Are you blind? Are you blind!?" His aggressive demeanor, coupled with a close physical proximity, adds a palpable tension to the encounter.
This brief but significant incident is captured on camera, shedding light on the fragile disposition of Ron DeSantis. If he struggles to maintain composure while addressing mild inquiries, the pressing question arises: can he be entrusted with the immense responsibility that comes with access to the nuclear button?
Perhaps the governor's perpetually sour temperament can be attributed to his recent blunder in unveiling his campaign on Twitter, resulting in a significant decline in his polling numbers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
FACE TO FACE:🏆 Barack Hussein Obama was able to secure the popular vote, whereas Trump was not. Additionally, Obama served two terms as the President of the United States, whereas Trump did not. Furthermore, Obama was honored with the prestigious Time Person of the Year award and was also awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Conversely, Trump did not receive these acknowledgments. Obama's achievements also include being granted the Profile Courage Award, winning a Grammy Award for Best-Spoken Word Album, and receiving a Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Narrator. On the contrary, Trump did not have these accomplishments. Moreover, Obama was recognized as the Financial Person of the Year and was given the notable King Abdulaziz Medal as well as the esteemed Phoenix Award. However, Trump did not receive any of these commendations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
States that pre-ordered COVID vaccines for children:
AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY
States that refused:
FL
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1