Comments by "maynunal" (@maynunal) on "John Durham drops major bombshells during Trump-Russia collusion probe hearing" video.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Title: Fiery Exchange: Criticism of Jim Jordan's Stance on FBI Investigation
A recent confrontation involving Jim Jordan's complaints about the treatment of former President Trump by the FBI took a dramatic turn. Jordan, who was questioning the fairness of the investigation, faced a biting response when reminded that he had not passed the bar exam after law school, labeling him an "ignorant joke."
The exchange intensified as Jordan tweeted a warning about the FBI's capabilities, only to be dismantled by Democratic candidate John Burrows. Burrows emphasized the principle of equal treatment under the law, asserting that it applies to everyone, whether they are a former president or, in this case, someone comparable to the "town idiot."
Ironically, Burrows then acknowledged that Jordan was correct about the law treating presidential candidates like any other citizen. However, he highlighted the potential consequences of non-compliance with government requests, disregarding subpoenas, and mishandling classified information. A jab was also thrown at Jordan regarding his alleged negligence in addressing cases of sexual abuse.
The exchange concluded with a scathing remark, suggesting that someone vigorously shielding Trump from his alleged criminality should not be a part of the judiciary committee. The exchange left Jordan seemingly wounded, prompting the need for metaphorical "ointment" to soothe the burn.
The question remains: Should someone who shows considerable effort to protect Trump from his legal issues be removed from the judiciary committee?
1
-
1
-
1