Comments by "Yurichtube" (@yurichtube1162) on "" video.

  1. There is an autonome region in northern iraq. In the future, there will be one in iran, turkey and syria (syria already has one called rojava).
    8
  2.  Salman Tajamal  no bro, Kurds have every religion and even unknown among them.
    7
  3.  @hdhdhbdbdhd2409  kurds racist? Not at all. Kurds intermarry all the time.
    2
  4.  S. Mesut  turkey should give Kurds a country
    2
  5. Turkey likes turks to be supreme, and would therefor cry because they are babies. Mommy EU and papa USA don't like to put up with an obnoxious baby so they would just try to appease it.
    2
  6.  @Anticolonialist  Kurds real nation is the part where majority of Kurds live AKA Kurdistan region. That is south East turkey, north and nort East Syria, Kurdistan region of Iraq and Kurdish part of Iran. If you know history you would know that the treaty sevres was about to grant a Kurdistan, but because the turks rebelled they forced a new treaty, treaty of loussiane. Rest is history.
    2
  7.  @AR-rg2en  common sense? Lol. They are being killed left and right, and kept in poverty. Because they are Kurd and Sunni. Influenced by their neighboors ofcourse
    2
  8. Okularda Kurtce ogretin kardes olalim. Hadi bakalim laflar bitti, gosterin. Turk yalanlardan biktik.
    1
  9. Not true. Kurds only attack when attacked. They have attacked everyone who wronged them, even big ones like turkeym
    1
  10. No need for seperation. Autonomy could work as well. Meaning still apart of Syria, but governing their area in Kurdish. A great alternative to an independent state. With the middle east now, WW3 might start soon if a new country would form. Except if that is your aim ofcourse?
    1
  11. Terrirtory that was stolen through blood? The areas are predominantly Kurdish, even 100 years ago. Kurds are only taking it back, because it is theirs.
    1
  12.  @esra9993  peacefully? You mean force. 100.000+ Kurds have been killed by racist Turks.
    1
  13. Racist Turk
    1
  14. Yes and no. The treaty of Sevres would have granted Kurds a Kurdistan, only if they promised their alligiance to France and England (would have been a smart choice). However, the turks objected and refused because of their new found nationalism. They rebelled, and the Kurds were tricked fighting for the ottoman empire (Kurds were extremly religious back then, better to be part of islamic ottomans then christian Brits was the idea). They fought and won. Then ataturk came and forced a new deal, treaty of loussiane. This would give the turks the choice of granting Kurds a country (obviously a no). The Brits and French then went and made deals with the Arabs to form Syria and Iraq. Iran was also formed with this treaty, as well as Saudi Arabia and many other countries. And turkey was formed along them. They were pretty modern and secular too back then, not like today. So in a way, Islam kept them for having a country. Only the rest (Turks and Arabs) were far removed from islam so they might as well have chosen for England. Like the great general Sellahadin, who gave all his wealth to widows of enemies and the poor in the name of islam and honour, the Kurds did the same. A poor choice, seeing what a dictator Ataturk and the Arabs were.
    1
  15. All these new countries basically took Kurdish areas for their own.
    1
  16. There is not much choice when you have countries like turkey clinging to their nazi thinking force turkify everything. I would rather be friends with the USA and have a country and be an ally then be killed by racist, non muslim turkey. Between israel and turkey, there is no difference.
    1
  17. No, Kurdish is his own langugue. And there might be iranic roots, Kurds are there own people. We are indo Europeans, but also mixed with local semites.
    1