Comments by "Master Sonogashira" (@mastersonogashira1796) on "Paul Joseph Watson Spreads Fear. London is Not a ******" video.

Jeremy Anthony “Hate speech and freedom of speech are two different things.”
1
Jeremy Anthony see the fact that there is no “legal definition” for hate speech makes it so that people can take advantage and poke at the edge of the law. I think both of these videos target specific group of people by stereotyping, which is dangerously close to hate speech. I would say a negative comment targeting large groups of people defined by their physical traits are often hate speech, but of course, there are always exception.
1
Yea, but have u seen the original video? It’s a racist hate speech with a geopolitical click bait.
1
@11I00OO1I0O1Il@Primer Ministro Sans De Britannia@Save State People in Hitler, Stalin, Mao’ time all thought the same thing. If we all allow to speak our mind, the world will turn into an anarchy or dictatorship. That’s why free speech has its limit, and yes, I support censoring far left information as well as far right. Because now it has already stray away from progressive discussions. “When debater only cares for winning, the debate will lose its purpose.” So, ask yourself, is Paul Joseph Watson making that video because he cares about London, or he just want to “stick it up” to the leftist?
1
Monte Raid so many logical fallacies in your argument... 1. Ad hominem: stop attacking me and argue about the topic 2. Non Sequitur: so you think my idea of dictatorship is stupid, fine, define yours 3. Genetic Fallacy: why? Why? Why is London is getting worse? Give me reasoning! 4. Straw man: so you quoted me, nice, what about them? Explain to me why you quoted me And most of all, I don’t think you even made a point. Your whole comment is just to argue with me, exactly proving me point that these day people just want to argue for the sake of arguing
1
@Arroobadooba Durkhahakh I don’t think u understand what I said. These people rise to power due to the fact they are allowed to spread their radical idea under free speech. Maybe not Stalin, but hitler and mao definitely used the public emotion, with all pathos but no logos. Sounds familiar? Yea, basic what trump does in his speech as well, no logic, pure emotion appeal.
1
@Save State he was given power because of his “charismatic” speeches...... you might found that certain president shares his “charism”. Idk about you, but I wouldn’t choose my country’s leader just because he makes good speeches
1
@Arroobadooba Durkhahakh I’m not American. Plus, Americans are already fighting themselves. Idk US politics is a tragedy or a comedy, but it’s sure going haywire... and I’m not saying that trump is a dictator, but his ideology is dangerously radical, which is often leads to dictatorship
1
@Arroobadooba Durkhahakh I click on read more, I stop reading... sending essay on YouTube... you might get copy right strike😂
1
@Arroobadooba Durkhahakh you put effort in coherent argument in debates, not YouTube comment sections. And the end of the day, if we can’t care for the poor, how are we different from the 18 century, where capital is concentrate in the few and poverty is distributed in the many?
1
@Arroobadooba Durkhahakh nah ppl who type that long of a paragraph has clearly too much free time and not enough student loan debt😂
1