General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Conservative observer
The Officer Tatum
comments

Comments by "Conservative observer" (@divestedkonservativekarame4269) on "" video.

He didn't hurt anybody. A woman who chooses to webcam can honestly choose to do that. That's not hurting anybody. If that's what she chooses to do as her occupation that's her choice. Webcam models are completely legal. If you don't like that their legal fight for it to be illegal. But I think you need to worry about pornography where people are actually having sex on camera for money before you actually worried about a random woman dancing on webcam nude
16
He is not a pimp. To pimp someone out you have to prostitute them out. Nobody engaged in prostitution. Webcamming is completely legal
11
@Berryations yeah definitely is propaganda. They're lying. Pretending this is prostitution when it's completely legal business. You can have a webcam in business. Webcamming models are completely legal. Nobody is in the wrong as far as the law.
7
@RA-wp6th he had a harem of women working for him and what capacity as far as webcam? By the way that's not trafficking. There's no prostitution involved if it was just webcam in. Webcamming is completely legal prostitution isn't
4
@kylegill4932 so convincing an adult to enter a contract with you and a specific business as an independent contractor as what webcam models are usually. Is not a crime. People enter contracts and convince people to enter those contracts. All the time. As long as they are over 18. And they understand the deal.
4
@kylegill4932 also you are trying to use fanciful words to make people emotional. But not actually deal with the facts of the situation in the story you try to use the sex industry to hide the fact that it is a legal profession being a webcam model is a legal profession. Webcam businesses are legal businesses. You're trying to make up stuff. And that's why you're trying to disguise what it actually is. You can actually explain what he actually did and true defintion. He owned a webcamming business. Not illegal in any regard. Recruiting people for his webcamming business is not wrong. Most business owners do recruit people to employ at their specific business that they own. Nothing's shocking about that. If he wants to recruit a woman he's dating that's fine. Because people hire people they're dating all the time.
4
Webcam in is not prostitution. They're different things.
4
@joleokach I feel like everyone who's against him are the main ones doing the lying imp
4
@kylegill4932 you thought that you could manipulate people in your comment. Like trying to use words that do not specifically described webcamming. To roundabouts try to implicate him as somebody who is breaking the law one that is not true. So you are a manipulative person. You are not truthful. And you thought you were going to attack people by their intellect. Because you overestimate your own intellect by thinking people would not see exactly what you're doing.
3
@k.popper2620 okay so your feelings are just hurt LMAO
2
@KayinPhylosophy4250 as far as webcam and he didn't do anything wrong. As far as the tape of him saying he likes it sexually assaulting women that is wrong. But nobody's talkin about that because that's not what he's being charged with. That's why to me I don't agree with him as a person I think that he's a criminal. But as far as the charges made. You can't see webcamming is a crime when it's it's it's a legal occupation
2
@Horsekick9times yes webcamming businesses many of them will take a lot of money out of people. But that's the agreement that that person goes under. You act like women or children and they can't go under contract. If this is the case and women don't eat equal rights to men.
2
eljugador1785 maybe if that's true because I never heard of anything like that. LMAO
2
I understand that was the old hymn. But to me I don't see anything wrong with what he did. That's the thing people keep acting like he did something wrong. And it's like women are not children. Women are adults. They choose to get on the webcam and get new well that's what you chose to do. It's perfectly legal. So you can't be upset at that. It's not pimping. It's not trafficking. Because there is no prostitution involved.
2
I agree with this point of view.
2
@kylegill4932 trafficking pertains to prostitution. Not webcamming. You cannot use trafficking for webcamming. Because one know sex is involved. So it's not even on the level of prostitution or even pnography even whichs legal
2
@i0li0il0i no it you can tell that this is not about tricking anyone. Because once they know what their job is webcamming they didn't choose not to do it. This is about advertisement this is about convincing someone to work for you convincing someone to buy your product. Nothing wrong with that. Especially since the product is not illegal.
2
@magegeneral6988 yeah I guess it in their minds women who don't have sex on the first date. Are committing theft LMAO 🤣🤣🤣
2
@magegeneral6988 I agree if he used to gun or kept people in his house illegally. Of course I think he needs to be charged. Then he has he committed a crime. If you force these women to stay in his home and webcam. But he didn't. He they were allowed to come and go as they please. So that to me is going back down to how people are trying to act like women or children. And if women are children they don't deserve equal rights. Yet it can't be that you're saying women are equal to men. But then say oh somebody tricked a woman. A woman fell for the something now people need to go to jail. Will men were treating women like those women were equal to them mentally. So if she was tricked. We were going under the guise that women and men are equal. And I honestly believe women and men are equal. I think there are dimmer brained men and women. And they shouldn't be charging other people who are smarter than them for convincing them to enter contract that they regret entering they regret their decision. As an adult you have to take responsibility for your actions and decisions and if you don't like what you agreed to enter into. Then you need to blame yourself. And make better decisions for the future.
2
You can't grown a full grown woman. And if you can Crohn's in need the protections of children and their for grown women don't deserve equal rights. Secondarily there is no such thing as pimping when it comes to webcamming. There is no such thing as prostitution that is happening in these cases. Therefore it is not a situation of trafficking. Cuz sucks did not take place and it is not an illegal profession. That's why you have to equate the actions being done the same as if he had a mom-and-pop business for example that was akin to McDonalds. If he hired his girlfriends and things of that nature to be managers and whatever else. That would be his choice. Many people have mom-and-pop businesses where they hire their significant others and their relatives and so forth. Nobody has an issue with this. So you shouldn't have an issue with this either. Just because he was in a relationship with a woman and hired her in his webcamming business it's no different than having a fast food chain and you hire your girlfriend or whatever the case. This is not illegal.webcam in businesses are in the same Lane as any other job. And like if somebody says they don't want to do that job. There are plenty of jobs that people do not want to do. That doesn't mean that there traffic. But from what I understand most of the women in his company were very happy. Because they were making good money too.
1
eljugador1785 it's completely legal for him to have a webcam business
1
@fuchsiasecret120 sweetie women are not children. It looks like your woman. So are you saying you're mentally disabled? Because women are not weak-minded. If you are weak-minded enough to be controlled by another adult. That is not that adults fault. That you are dimmer in the brain. People convinced people to enter contracts all the time. As long as you're an adult. That's just how it is. You got to understand with businesses they advertise they convinced they'd encourage people to either buy their product or to be employed at their business. This is what all businesses do. The problem is is that the person is supposed to filter and figure out if this is for them if the product has for them. If their job that they're offering is for them. That's up to the adult that they're advertising to to decide. If you made a bad decision that's nobody's fault. You're an adult and you're accountable for the decisions that you make.
1
@fuchsiasecret120 prn isn't illegal. Nor is it a crime. I said this before. If you don't like that prns legal fight for it to be illegal. But you can't claim somebody made prn and they should go to jail for it. When it's literally legal to make. As long as everyone is over 18
1
@fuchsiasecret120 no people who are business owners and they deal in an advertisement. They do convince the public to basically by or be employed at their business. That is their job. You don't understand how the adult world work at world works. And also you had more of a narcissistic view. You think just because you don't like the proud of he's selling. That he shouldn't be able to sell it. But it's perfectly legal to sell. What is the thing is you need to understand is you don't need to buy it and you don't need to work for him. But others can. Because it's completely legal
1
@fuchsiasecret120 no this is his often encourage people and get people to open their minds to whatever they're selling so say you don't like cheese crackers. But somebody from Cheez-Its comes along and changes your mind. You may have a different mind frame from now on on Jesus. Because somebody change your view on it. This could be in eating Cheez-Its. This could be in making cheese it's at a factory. Either way it's the same thing with his webcamming business.
1
@angelocorbin3338 yeah my mom calls me trash. I personally have a mentality where I do not agree with the tape that came out on him with that girl in England. But when it comes to the webcamming business I do not think that he committed any crimes. So I am definitely not an Andrew Tate fan. I'm just saying it like it is. We don't need to be pretending legal occupations are crimes. If we don't want it to be legal you just have to fight for it not to be legal.
1
@leonthelionkelvin626 no it as a business owner he should have obviously promoted his business to potential employees and potential buyers. He did so. And that is what any business owner would do.
1
@talkingtina4519 women aren't getting hurt when they're just dancing in front of a webcam nude. How are they getting hurt? It's just like any other job.
1
It's a liberal mindset. And I hated it they kept talking about rappers and things of that nature.
1
@Berryations I don't think he feels that it's a bad action that he did. Because it made him money and it made him who he is today. That is a long his moral standards. That's on him. You can't invoke your own moral standards on to others. You need to keep those to yourself. In my opinion as long as it's legal that's between the person who's doing it. And what their moral standard. Is.
1
@gotzmoneywayne8216 no not at all. Not everyone believes in the Bible. It takes a low IQ for that sweetie
1
@roblacksnail8615 no people of different faiths can have different moral grounds. And moral standards. And the Quran specifically there will be Muslim to will go to hell. So clearly there is a difference of the moral standards even though people of the same faith
1
@ImtoolVideos he got it from actually pulverizing men. In the ring from what I've heard.
1
@roblacksnail8615 I don't think you understand what believer means and Islam. It just means that you're Christian Jewish or Muslim. And it also says that people who are believers aren't necessarily going to make it to heaven. Just because you praise GOD and believe in GOD. Does not mean you are going to heaven because you also have to do right. That's why I also says in the Quran that if you believe in GOD the last day and do right. You have to do all three of these things. So you could be a believer Jewish Muslim or christian by the way. And still make it to hell.
1
@roblacksnail8615 yeah I don't believe it Armageddon. And by the way Muslims do not believe in Armageddon. So we do not believe that a vice is going to damn anyone so because they don't have the power to do so. Their souls are Damned.
1
@JMBBrasil no pimps are people who encourage prostitution. Webcamming is not prostitution. No your loss. If you don't like that webcamming is legal. Petition and fight for it to be illegal. But webcamming is completely legal.
1
@josephposenecker9741 I think how Rogan is racist because he's basically a democrat
1
@RA-wp6th why are you lying? Look it up. Sex work it specifically says that they're 25 types of sex work. And not one of them include webcamming. So why did you just try and lie and say that it was sex work. Oh yeah because you wanted to tie it to prostitution which is not. Prostitution is illegal. Pimping is illegal because it's connected to prostitution. And lover-boy method is considered illegal because it's connected to pimping which is connected to prostitution. All illegal occupations. Webcamming is not prostitution. It's not even included with sex work. Because they're not having sex for money. And they're not even having sex. Solo webcamming is just simply at the most masturbation. But most of the time they're not even doing that there's more of the time entertaining than anything. So you can't try and lie like this. You guys keep lying. Use the truth once in awhile don't you think?
1
@RA-wp6th webcamming is not prostitution. Webcamming is actually legal. I think you need to educate yourself.
1
@Cristian-qo7vf no she was just being fair.
1
@RA-wp6th no that's just called advertising. Business is advertised to employees and potential buyers. That is not a crime. For any business. Including webcamming.
1
@RA-wp6th also you called webcamming sex work. Which if you look it up there 25 versions of sex work. None of them include webcamming. If you look it up generally sex workers are considered prostitutes. I didn't know this for a long time. Because it can be ambiguous. But generally it's not seen as sex work. If you think of it it shouldn't be. Is Hooters sex work? I wouldn't consider it sex work. So if that's not sex word. Then neither should webcamming.
1
@ImtoolVideos webcamming is a legal business. And the fact that he conducted his business that way is totally legal. It's advertisement
1
@ImtoolVideos you guys are really delusional. You really think if you see a woman and dude on a screen. You had sex with her. LMAO webcamming it's not sex.
1
@ImtoolVideos that's why it's not considered sex work. No sex is involved in the job. So technically it's not sex. Is that was sex then I guess it taking a shower too. Sex is specific it's a specific act of having sex. Prn is actually having sex online. But webcamming is not. At the most there's masturbation. Most of the time it's not even that
1
@ImtoolVideos so I think that you need to avoid actually talking about things you don't know. Or lying. I don't know maybe you're lying. And you just want to pretend that webcamming is apart of prostitution. And therefore you are upset at the fact that it's legal. And your aim is to lie and make people think that he committed a crime when he didn't. Because you wish he committed a crime because you which webcamming was outlawed but it's not.
1
@ImtoolVideos Lastlywomen are grown. If they are not able to defend themselves mentally. They don't deserve equal rights. Many employers of many different jobs. Encourage people to work at their job. That is the same thing he did they're convincing women to work for him. He has a totally legit business. And it's not in the sex work world. It's not a brothel. So his business and his job that he is offering these women is just as legit as McDonalds. If an employer at McDonald's encourages people to be employed at McDonald's and save some of these people are women. There is no crime committed. Same here your saltine women's decisions to be webcams on Andrew Tate. Women are full grown and they have the right to decide whether they want to be webcam models even if someone is convincing them to do when people enter a contract theory many times people are trying to convince them to enter that contract. As a full-grown adult over 18 you are supposed to have enough of a mental wherewithal to be able to decide whether you want to enter it or not. And to weigh your options.
1
@ImtoolVideos and the only dumb argument is the argument of trying to disguise webcamming as prostitution. To disguise it as sex work. To a disguise that there is sex involved in webcamming when there is none
1
@RA-wp6th no you're just using a trick of words. It's called convincing than advertisement. When it comes to webcamming businesses and businesses of any kind. Yes they do convince people to work for them. It for financial gain. What do you think it's 420 smells of flowers? No it's for financial gain. The only one ignorant here is the person who doesn't know the difference between prostitution and webcamming. And not understanding that obviously when is someone has a legit business they do advertise.
1
@NeuJynXproductions and you are so far from a lawyer I don't think you can sit down I think you need to lie down.
1
@nategin9009 I watch the videos where they're smearing him specifically what he said in his videos was he was not interested and prostitution. So being a pimp would not be a label you could put on him because he doesn't involve himself in prostitution or anything that has to do with sex by the way. You guys are calling everything sex next thing breathing will be sex.
1
@nategin9009 I bet it's someone of your minds that thinks if you breathe in the direction of a nude woman you've had sex. How messed up. LMAO
1
@madgodloki no that's not true. Sex work online would imply online escorts services etc some would possibly stretch that out to prn not webcamming. If you look up the 25 versions of sex work. You will find that web cameras are not included. I think men don't like to admit that they spend money on things that are not sex. Because it makes them look more lame. That's why they want web cameras to be sex workers. Even though they do not perform sex. Therefore they cannot be sex workers. I'm not seeing my opinion this is having to do with the 25 types of sex work that were identified buy legal agencies. You can look it up on Google it. It's literally 25 types of sex word. But none of it includes web cameras. It makes sense. Honestly because if that's the case then what about women who send nude photos to men online that they're talkin to or dating
1
@madgodloki cuz technically then you could also say Victoria's secret models are sex workers. I don't think they are legally seen that way
1
@madgodloki so yes webcamming by the way is a very legal profession. And it kind of makes sense why it is. Because how can you say someone cannot be in udon their own webcam. And pay people to have them wash them nude on their webcam if they want to. It doesn't make any sense. Because they're not specifically having sex. They aren't selling sex. Because there is no sex occurring. I understand some men feel very personal and hurt by this I think. Because they're literally pain for something that doesn't even result in sex how Lame does that make them feel? If people acknowledge it as not even being sex. That's why you want to convince people that is actually sucks when it's not. Just stop paying for it. If you really think it's that lame.
1
@madgodloki because obviously it is not sex if you just see nude photos of someone or a nude person on a webcam. What does that even mean? Why do you think if you see someone knew Donny photo that somehow you've had sex with them. Does that make any sense?
1
@madgodloki no that's your opinion sweetie I'm linking sources that specifically don't include webcammers as sex work lmao 🤣 as I said before if this was the case Victoria secret models would be sex workers.... You're just making up a definition that fits your opinion
1
@madgodloki oh on the whole thing of you talking about sex trafficking yes I agree if he was employing and his webcamming business anyone under the age of eighteen then yes he would be right to be arrested for such. He should be charged for sex trafficking. But the thing is he involved himself with only women over 18 from all the evidence put forward. At that point they would also include having photos or material of child prn is that was the case. So obviously that's not what he's guilty of. What Cameron is completely legal. And you can have a business with webcamming. You can talk women into getting employed and your webcam E-Business. That's your choice. And that's a part of your advertisement and your job honestly as a webcam business. All webcam businesses try to get women to get employed so they can get nude on the webcam. For money. This is a part of the whole job for those people. This is what they choose to do and if they like it. That's not anyone's business because it's a legal profession. You are upset because it's legal. That's why you're trying to dress it up as a legal. But that doesn't change the law.
1
@madgodloki no that's not commercial sex work. Any more than a Victoria's secrets model is
1
@madgodloki heres another definition sweetie What is the legal definition of sex work? California Penal Code 647(b) generally defines prostitution as engaging in sexual conduct in exchange for money or other compensation. Therefore, under this law, it's a crime to commit prostitution or to solicit it. In other words, it applies to someone who offers sexual services and the person who accepts them.Feb 4, 2023
1
@madgodloki what cameras are not considered sex workers. Reason why is because they don't have sex. It's like for example for phone sex operators. They don't have sex. It's about a fantasy that you're talkin to the person about. And I feel that web cameras still are under that fantasy side of things. You could also say the Victoria's secret models live under the fantasy side of things. They're not quite sex workers. Because sex doesn't occur. Yes you can be a waitress at Hooters. Where you're topless. There are lots of topless waitresses and so forth. So like I said they can do all that without actually being prostitutes or sex workers
1
@madgodloki as I said before webcamming is legal how he conducted his business if he conducted his business this way as a person who was the owner of McDonalds. You wouldn't be saying that that was a crime. Because McDonald's is a legal business. You can convince people to work at McDonalds. Just the same as you can convince people to work at a webcamming business. All these jobs honestly have the same tactics. At the end of the day. From telephone interviews working at McDonald's or webcamming. Because nobody wants these jobs that deeply with waitressing and webcamming companies learn their employees by how much money they make. That's okay. You may look down on it. But that's just how it is
1
@madgodloki I'd say Victoria secret models are much closer to commercial sex workers considering they're more.widely distributed like most glamour.models for sexual gratification much more than any random nude woman on a screen just saying
1
@madgodloki do you know what the definition of sexual activity is? LMAO that doesn't include webcamming. Showering isn't sexual activity
1
@madgodloki Human sexual activity, human sexual practice or human sexual behaviour is the manner in which humans experience and express their sexuality. People engage in a variety of sexual acts, ranging from activities done alone to acts with another person in varying patterns of frequency, for a wide variety of reasons That's the definition of sexual activity. It does not include walking around nude.
1
@madgodloki pictures and/or writings of sexual activity intended solely to excite lascivious feelings of a particularly blatant and aberrational kind, such as acts involving children, animals, orgies, and all types of sexual intercourse That's the definition of prn Webcamming doesn't include the above in solo webcamming. Couples webcamming is prb BTW NOT showering
1
@madgodloki what's Solo webcamming is not prn Norwich prostitution because they aren't having sex. That's pathetic. You literally would count that as your body count if you watched a webcam MODEL
1
@madgodloki no women are not children. It women can agree to enter a contract if women and men are equal. And have equal rights. And as a woman I find that very insulting for you to be so misogynistic to think that women can't make the decisions for themselves.
1
@madgodloki go back to what I was saying it's no different than obviously working at McDonald's and an employer convincing you to work at McDonalds. To be an employee at McDonalds. What you being an employee at precision opinion or to be an employee at a webcamming business. Order being employed as a waitress. And all facilities. Nobody wants to work those jobs usually. Cuz nobody really wants to keep calling poop I keep getting cursed out as a phone interview were talking about politics and people potholes. Nobody really wants to be a making those burgers for a small amounts of money. Nobody really actually wants to be a waitress. Serving people. And some people do not like webcamming some people do. It just matters on that. But like to me it's likethere are plenty of people who don't like the job site just mentioned. But there are plenty of people who are still encouraging people to work at those jobs because they are business owners of those supposed jobs. So do you getting upset about one type of job just because you don't like that job. And people trying to convince people to work for them and that specific facility. Is not sex trafficking. Because it's not illegal in the first place. A business owner is supposed to convince people to work for them and they're supposed to convince the potential buyers to buy from them. It works. You're upset that webcamming businesses are functioning like webcam businesses the reason you don't like that they're functioning like regular businesses. It's because you don't see it as a regular business you see it as prostitution and sex trafficking and all that bullcrap. When it's not an illegal crime. They're not selling actual sex. They're not even selling prn. They're selling two men who are willing to spend their money on absolutely nothing.
1
@madgodloki I feel that you want them to have spent money on something because you are one of those men who have spent on those webcam girls. And because of that you don't want to think in your head there just basically gaining you. Obviously. Because you wouldn't buy it in the first place. But that wasn't anyone's fault that you bought something that did not even include sex. LMAO
1
@madgodloki now another thing goes. Major thing that strippers web cameras and phone sex operators make money off of the idea that you think that they are sex workers. Meaning that you think that they had the capability of having sex for money. Which means that they're going to gain you as long as they can for as much money as they can. With me idea that you think that you're going to get sex eventually. But you never will. Because why would they ever have sex with you when they could just keep gaming you? And once you're done with. They'll be another one to keep gaming. LMAO 🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
@kylegill4932 no it is not illegal. Women are grown women. Women are able to consent. Women can enter contracts. If women cannot do these things. At the age of 18. Then they don't need to have equal rights they deserve to be treated like children for the rest of their lives.
1
@kylegill4932 and women are not girls. Women are grown women who can make decisions for themselves. If a man is sweet-talkin her and she believes it that's her business 41. Many men say they want to be a relationship with women and they only want sex. That doesn't mean they are somehow committing a crime. You're supposed to filter men. And if your filter isn't right. Well maybe you need to actually make adjustments. This is the adult world. Women aren't children.
1
@kylegill4932 I'm a woman. You didn't think I could be a woman and have my perspective did you? No because someone and actually understand that if we do believe that we're equal to Men. We are equal to men. Either we get the equal Rights and are mentally capable of basically making our own decisions or basically we need to be treated like children and basically the rights need to be taken away. It's simple as that it doesn't matter that he met them on a dating site. They should have been of the mindset that they were making the best choices for themselves. That was their responsibility. It is always a grown adult responsibilities to find the occupation that is best for them. And that is no one else's fault that you chose the wrong job. It's like somebody complaining at my old job as a telephone survey interviewer that they were traumatized because somebody said something vulgar to them on the phone. Which is what happens a lot on telephone interviews you get plenty of political surveys and people say lots of different things to people I've had women literally get off the phone she disconnected the computer. Ran out slam doors curse people out. Because of what somebody said on a dang phone. Apparently she was triggered. And she never came back again. But it's nobody fault that she chose that job. She shouldn't blame precision opinion for specifically trying to get a job with them. And having customer seat apparently things that sent her over the edge. It's her responsibility to make the decision to find a job that is suitable for her. If an employer offers her a job that she doesn't like she can choose not to work it. Women have the same mental capabilities as men. And since some people seem to not understand that. You should have the mentality that women don't deserve equal rights if they don't have the same capabilities as men.
1
@kylegill4932 by the way I'm attracted to trans women. Their biological men too. But that's not the point.
1
@kylegill4932 let's be real I'm only 5'1. Anybody who transitions to live as a woman. Is still a lot bigger than me. What I think of men who are attracted to trans women I think that they're bisexual. Because I can't understand how someone can be attracted to the same thing I'm attracted to and be a man. And specifically think there's somehow straight. Because I am very straight. And I'm only attracted to mail people. Like you have to understand. Someone who is a trans woman before they had surgery. They were just like any other man. So literally the energy that people give off is what were attracted to. So that means if that person is attracted to men they just didn't know that person wasnt man but the energy that the person gives off and that person in themselves will literally be the same person with or without plastic surgery. Which tells you that it's social reason that they think they're straight. But not actually a genetic biological reason that they're straight. I am naturally straight. It's not something I choose to be. I cannot make myself unstraight. I just am. There have been plenty of times when I was a teen that I wished I was not straight. Because I am a person who specifically I've always identified more with the masculine identity. So it was always weird. Because people always expect straight women to be feminine. But I'm not. Why lesbians and bisexuals have lot more room when it comes to expression. So when I was 18. I always thought it would have been easier if I was just attracted to women. But I'm not attracted to any shape or form of a female person. It doesn't even matter if they're transmen I'm still not attracted to them. I don't like female genitalia. It's very weird to look at. And females look weak to me they're small and their bones are small. My bones aren't as small. Like I'm not as round as most women. But I'm certainly not as angular as most male people. So it just never made any sense to me. So yeah like to me a person who's attracted to a trans woman even if they don't know that she's trans. To me is somebody who isn't straight.
1
@kylegill4932 yeah it doesn't change anything that you are constantly lie and continue to hide what he was actually doing which is being the business owner of a webcam company. Of which you want to be the same. The only one lying is you
1
@kylegill4932 no I've already exposed you. You obviously don't want to talk about webcamming. Because you don't like webcamming. You wish webcamming was illegal. And that's why you want and route 82 be charged for it. That's why you can't say the word webcamming. You have to say sex work. You have to lie. And say that it's sex work. 25 types of sex work has been listed. And it never listed webcamming. You have to call it sex industry trafficking. You can't talk about what he actually did which was only a webcamming business. Owning a webcamming business is completely legal. And you don't like that it's legal. So you want to disguise it with trying to associated with prostitution which it is nothing like
1
@stsk1061 it doesn't change anything prostitution is still not webcamming
1
@kylegill4932 now you're just trying to accuse people of all sorts of stuff. Because you're upset I have the different view than you.
1
@kylegill4932 and now it's on the basis of Andrew Tate having a webcam business. So obviously they don't have any proof
1
@kylegill4932 no you want webcamming to be illegal and want him to be punished for it Basically
1
@kylegill4932 no you have no idea and you are completely ignorant. Because you gave going around saying that he should be charged and he is charged with trafficking and the loverboy method when he wasn't involved in prostitution. He was involved in a webcamming business. And that is perfectly legal. So the fact that he treated his employees like employees make sense because he was doing a job that was specifically pertaining to having employees
1
No the only one who's a liar is you. Because you're literally calling someone a pimp who didn't even deal in prostitution. A pimp is someone who deals in prostitution. You are just a hater who wishes that he dealt with prostitutes. But you can't actually deal with the truth of the situation. He doesn't need business which is webcamming. That is a completely legal business. So you can't see that he was a criminal in any regard. Saying that he wanted to have sex with the webcam models before they started webcam that kind of actually makes sense. You want to see what the sexual peel of your webcam models potentially will be. That makes sense. On that level. Just saying it would make sense for him to see their sexual energy. Since this job is webcamming. Their bodies are a big part of webcamming their sexual Aura is a big part of webcamming. It makes sense that he would want to have sex with them before they start getting on webcam. It's just like for example if somebody is selling wine. And they want to make sure that wine is Tip-Top shape. They're going to make sure that the quality of the wine is good. So that actually does make sense. You're going to test it. Before you give it out to the public.
1
@beksaylor pimp mean specifically encouraged on to prostitute themselves out. This man had nothing to do with prostitutes. Therefore he did not pimp anyone out. Because he had no prostitutes. He didn't encourage prostitution. I don't know if he's even against prostitution sounds like it.
1
@i0li0il0i pgraphy includes usually two people having sex on camera. Webcamming usually is solo. And usually you don't see that much of people having sex with themselves really. They may be teasing. Or they may do off camera stuff. So you know that they're actually you know masturbating. But usually you don't see it on cam. Either way it's not prostitution. Because you're not having sex. There's only one person involved. It's not prn because it's not two people having sex on cam
1
@D-Trez your sister to do with convincing an advertisement. People can convince someone and advertise to someone their business and encourage them to basically work for them or to encourage them to buy their product. This is perfectly fine to do with adults. And it seems like he saw out adults to employ and has webcamming business as well as got potential grown adult men to pay for these specific entertainment.
1
@D-Trez yes convincing someone to work for you. Is not a crime. Especially when that business you had is completely legal. Webcamming is completely legal so convincing someone to work for you is what most businesses do including webcamming businesses
1
@D-Trez the fact that he had sex with him beforehand it's the same as somebody it checking to make sure their wine is up-to-date that they sell. They don't want to give that product to people who are buying.
1
@D-Trez it's not prn prnography is for two ppl doing piv online. Webcam models are usually solo not actually having sex usually not even masturbating online tbh
1
@i0li0il0i yes all that he talked about was being a business owner. And just his perspective of what he was selling. That's it. It is like people don't understand if you don't like that webcamming is legal than change the laws. But don't get mad at the people who are doing it because it's legal.
1
@D-Trez no because you're trying to use the word sex industry. Because you're trying to manipulate the conversation. You say sex and just riso people can think of prostitution. When people talk about sex work and sex industry they're actually usually associating that with prostitution. They are not talking about webcamming. You can look it up the 25 ways of sex work. None of it includes webcamming. Because it's not included. Because sex is not occurring with webcamming. Which is why it's legal by the way.
1
@D-Trez no it's not a crime you just are angry that it's not a crime so that's why you're lying and saying it's the sex industry. And so forth. Because you don't want to call it what it is what can business. No sex industry not sex work it's a webcamming business.
1
@D-Trez why do YOU have to lie?
1
@13animeholic1314 try again. I think the man is rapist. Did you hear that tape of him saying he loved raping that woman. Doesn't change that that webcam E-Business is not a crime. And that's what they're charging him for that's what they're investigating. Therefore those charges need to be dropped. Because you're looking to criminalize something that isn't a crime.
1
@Berryations no it's not women aren't children. If women are mentally less capable of helping themselves and defending themselves on a mental level. They do not deserve equal rights. They most certainly should not be voting. If they don't have the same capabilities as men. Mentally
1
@v1nigra3 they don't seem to comprehend that this is legal. Like they don't understand that this is legal work. It's a legal business. They keep talking about prostitution. Do you know what webcamming is? It's not even prn. They're not having sex with anyone on the it's cams usually they're just nude. They're just masturbating at the most. This is not illegal. It's just not. I think they need to focus on trying to make it illegal. That way they don't have to be so outraged about something that is going on very legally. In our society. We have the power to change if we want to change it.
1
@v1nigra3 but you can't get mad at people for doing occupations that you just don't agree with that are perfectly legal.
1