Comments by "Bond25" (@Bond2025) on "Channel 4 News" channel.

This behaviour goes on as people in the community don't speak out against criminals they know of. People that know who committed offences and killed this young girl should speak out, Why do people protecting criminals suddenly become selective as to who they will inform on? That makes them as bad. Do the right thing, give the name(s).
78
Most lawyers are the same, it's not just limited to immigration matters!
35
Almost as bad as that other muppet that lied about his picnic and a drive around to "test his eye sight". I always wondered how he was able to blackmail boris.
10
What the police should now do is start a proceeds of crime investigation and confiscate every penny he made and any property he had, including recovering amounts from family members if they were given gifts or money. This technique has been used in many other cases.
6
@IchaelGill Well it is one way to deal with re-offending. Once all the evidence comes out with the video of what happened, the support will slowly fade away and he will be forgotten, just like every other criminal. Victims are probably relieved and the local community probably feel safer now... The Police Officer will not be found guilty.
3
@petecernan2568 Imagine the shame of bringing up a child that was a vile criminal and went to prison.
2
Fear Of Being Labelled.
2
Maybe they know a lot more than they are telling us. Insurance job for example, vanishing after a failed business? Not expecting so much coverage?
2
Where is BLM and all the protests about this?
2
No evidence of this involving other vehicles on the CCTV, no evidence of medical problems produced at the Coroners Court during the Inquest. The family were quick to tell the press he was suffering medical problems...but refused to say what they were. It could be anything, maybe mental health issues. You will know yourself as a professional driver that you need to notify DVLA of certain things, so does a GP and anyone failing to can be prosecuted. If you knew you had a problem that meant you were not allowed to drive, you wouldn't do so. The Coroner is trying to protect families, but it only delays the true outcome and makes him look dishonest.
2
@dickieblench5001 NO IT IS NOT as it was glossed over in the Inquest hearing, no cause of death was given although it was known after a rushed post mortem. This makes me wonder whether it was to stop a backlash against the family that announced to the press just after the accident that they knew he was suffering medical problems. Why would anyone continue to drive knowing this and put so many people at risk? We are not being told the truth. If a driver was suffering medical problems they had a duty to report this to their employer and DVLA, their GP was also required by Law to report any notifiable conditions to DVLA. This is done to stop people being put at risk.
2
Firearms Officers DO get paid more than someone of the same rank as them with similar length of service. I happen to know one or two of them. They get a lot of overtime too for escort duties and protection duties, a lot of which is spent sitting about protecting scum criminals. I really doubt you are a police officer as you do not even understand the legal definition of Homicide or Murder. Not every death is as a result of Murder. The CPS has a policy of mis-charging to secure the original offence they wanted a conviction on. In this case they knew it could possibly be manslaughter at a push, but a jury could find a person not guilty with flimsy evidence. They might do a plea bargain and allow a guilty plea to a lesser offence, but that would be a s18 wounding and not considered serious. What they want is a plea to a lesser offence of manslaughter as a plea bargain, so have incorrectly charged a person with murder - knowing there is no evidence based on the legal definition of the offence and what the police have already said happened on the night. The Officer will be found not guilty as I suspect the CPS will need to offer no evidence once the evidence is presented correctly.
2
@grimreaperbadboy This was not found or produced as evidence at the Coroners Court during the inquest, so it is not true.
1
@grimreaperbadboy Not true as it was not found at a postmortem and not produced in evidence at the Inquest before a Coroners Court.
1
@sneakybudda NOT TRUE there was no medical evidence produced at the Inquest at the Coroners Court to suggest anything of the sort. The driver could have only fell asleep at the wheel.
1
Well that's 80 less criminals on the streets making everyone elses life a misery - how about thinking of all the victims of crime for once. Why should we all excuse the actions of criminals based on religion or colour of criminals or their relative's ability to incite rioting across the UK - a further criminal act involving many more victims. Outrageous decision to charge the police officer with any offence. The CPS is clearly doing this because of the fear of being labelled - or being sympathetic to criminals again. It is sad to see what is happening in the UK now. ALL police officers need to stick together now and refuse to carry guns as it could be them next. We will soon see who has no respect for their own colleagues.
1
The postmortem never showed ANY medical condition, or it would have been recorded by his GP and DVLA and produced and used in evidence at the inquest by the Coroner. It's more likely he fell asleep at the wheel as police did not find any drink or drugs in his system and neither did the postmortem or this would have been produced in evidence at the Coroners Court. I'm wondering why the family were so quick to tell the press about an existing medical problem together with a gofundme when the Coroner did not agree there was any medical cause for this accident. The Coroners inquest is available to all to read through.
1
@emilyhughes4297 Evidence was not given at the inquest and in Law, the decision is invalid and should be revisited with all the medical information being taken in to account. The Coroner has chosen to keep information to himself to protect the driver's family, but others deserve a true explanation. Why did the driver's family announce to the press that he was suffering a medical problem? DVLA should have revoked his licence until the correct tests were performed, his GP was required by Law to report him to DVLA and his employer should have been informed and made a decision to suspend him until the results of tests and decision by DVLA, something is not right about this. Had the proper procedures been followed, this would not have happened.
1
The post-mortem did not suggest this and no cause of death was given at the inquest - it was an incomplete investigation. What is a concern is the family knew and announced the driver was having medical issues but still chose to put all those children at risk. It is lucky many more were not killed by the driver.
1
This happens because people don't report them. People living in those areas. They think criminal offences are ok providing it's not against them. This is so wrong to protect criminals. Weeks later the police have run out of people to arrest in the hope one of them talks. They can't have any idea who did this or they would have the killer by now.
1
The Police investigation ruled out mechanical failure, distraction from phones etc and interaction with other vehicles just before the coach left the road. A number of lines of enquiry would be followed to study the driving before the crash - using the vehicle data to recreate the journey and show the position of all controls. The coach camera system would be viewed too. The police would have requested blood samples from the hospital for testing for drink and drugs, but nothing was found as no evidence of drink or legal or illegal drugs that could have impaired driving were found as there was no evidence produced to the Coroner at the Inquest. The postmortem failed to find any existing medical conditions as none were presented to the Coroner as evidence in the Inquest. GP records would be requested to look at the mental health of the driver, but nothing of interest was presented as evidence to the Coroner for the Inquest hearing. The family claimed the driver had suffered from some sort of medical condition at the time of the accident, but were told not to talk to the press and did not elaborate on what they thought it was. The postmortem found nothing. This could lead to two possibilities, a mental health condition - but the GP records did not show this, or he simply fell asleep as he was tired. This is looking like a more likely explanation in the absence of ANY medical findings. If he had medical problems he would have been prevented from driving anyway, so I can see why the Coroner is trying to protect families involved, but it is not correct to do this and withhold information.
1
@krim19 Police and legal people go to their own prisons! They are all together, mainly in open prisons. I hate to disappoint you! They do not get put in to the main scum of society population.
1
He will be found not guilty of any offence, the CPS will either drop it and offer no evidence or a jury will decide. The CPS is only doing this to stop lawless people that are bored from using it as an excuse to loot and riot. Hopefully the video and evidence will be released, then the supporters will slowly fade away.
1
@darrenwarner6500 Drug users are the biggest problem, they create the demand the same way as people downloading pics and videos create a demand for abuse. Dealers are a small part of the drug problem in the UK.
1
Braverman said what most people think, but are too scared to say out loud. As for cameroon, he just needs the money.
1
ALL of his colleagues should now stop carrying firearms as there is no protection when they use them on criminal scum.
1