Youtube comments of Bond25 (@Bond2025).

  1. 83
  2. 78
  3. 52
  4. 36
  5. 35
  6. 35
  7. 34
  8. 30
  9. 30
  10. 23
  11. 19
  12. 19
  13. 19
  14. 18
  15. 17
  16. Privacy and Anonymity are completely different. Tor was compromised in 2013, users can be identified by rogue nodes and traffic staining techniques. That is why GCHQ runs a lot of Tor Nodes. The Tor Browser Bundle was altered, possibly with the agreement of the developers to assist Law Enforcement with Operation Onymous in 2014. All the default security settings were changed to the lowest level and scripts were turned on. The script feature was also left operating despite the setting being set to off/blocked in later releases - to assist further with police investigations. The way it worked was that sites run a script when a user connected and the Tor Browser Bundle firefox sent replies outside Tor, back to Law Enforcement. Certain sites were given ID numbers and once the user connected, firefox run the script and identified the real IP address of the person. Tor Project would never answer questions over this. They also presented for download a version in November and December 2013 that had a "profiler trojan" built in, but only identifiable by Kaspersky antivirus at the time, because that company would not assist with exposing users. Some sites had pictures and videos that were modified, so they would cause a video player or picture viewer program to call for extra resources or a CODEC. Unless you blocked this or set VLC, for example, to connect out on a random IP and Port, you would be connected to Law Enforcement and they tracked you. Other files were just remote access trojans and law enforcement just sat watching what users did. VPNs are dangerous. YouTube affiliates only advertise them as they earn up to 40% of each referral. Most are only Proxy Servers, not VPNs. They operate on rented equipment in datacnters like M247 Ltd - who are forced to hand over all data in the UK at the request of police with a Production Order. The VPN collects, inspects, manipulates and redirects your data and sifts through to see if there is anything they can add to a user profile. Some VPNs want email addresses, phone numbers, WifI info, contact lists, PRECISE LOCATION and also your credit card details as your verified profile is sold for more. Even if the VPN doesn't collect all your data, the Host Company can and does sell it to whoever wants it A VPN only hides the IP, technology has moved on in the past 10years, now it is possible to trace anyone anywhere. Security Services can locate a person using facial recognition, using input from doorbells, CCTV, phones, ANPR etc. They can also tell who is with you if you are talking near a phone or alexa, or some TVs.
    17
  17. 16
  18. 16
  19. 15
  20. 13
  21. 12
  22. 12
  23. 12
  24. 12
  25. 11
  26. 11
  27. 11
  28. 10
  29. 10
  30. 10
  31. 9
  32. 9
  33. 9
  34. 9
  35. 9
  36. 9
  37. 9
  38. 9
  39. 8
  40. 8
  41. 7
  42. 7
  43. 7
  44. 7
  45. 7
  46. 7
  47. 6
  48. 6
  49. 6
  50. 6
  51. 6
  52. 6
  53. They have been deliberately fiddling the Home Office Crime Stats for 25 years, ever since "groups" and community self appointed leaders started complaining it was not fair to highlight which people committed most crime. When people were arrested and went in to a custody suite they had ethnicity details recorded up until around the mid 80s. As the police become more infiltrated by people with agendas, they stopped doing it. Every criminal case is meant to have recorded the ethnicity of the offender so that accurate crime maps can be produced and resources directed to areas that people are causing most problems in. So we had a whole list of things from W, B, C, A etc etc as a descriptor and 0-7 for degree of ethnicity. So I would be W/W1. That started to be the thing dishonest officers started putting on everything to prove some kind of point, or break the Law to hide real data. There was also a section with N/NS or not stated. That started being used around the times of riots in the 80s as it seemed unpopular to show which groups were causing problems! So the question is, why are these crime statistics now false? It is simple because it would "upset" people and try to hide a problem we now have. Had police not been so dishonest, we would have had true figures and could have dealt with the problems. People still have the cheek to excuse criminal behaviour by saying they do not want stop and search. If people don't want to get caught doing something wrong, don't hang about with other known people, don't form gangs, and don't do something you know is wrong. Don't try and stop the detection of illegal activity - it makes everyone say, "I told you so".
    6
  54. 5
  55. 5
  56. 5
  57. 5
  58. 5
  59. 5
  60. 5
  61. 5
  62. 5
  63. 5
  64. 5
  65. 4
  66. 4
  67. They know all the guard nodes too, what you might want to look at is the settings to make Tor settings look like Microsoft update data. This can help on DPI/DPI systems, but newer ones cross reference the traffic and IP, so it is pointless depending on who you are hiding from. A guard node is as insecure as an exit node. I could set one up and inspect and modify traffic. Police and Security Services in the UK do this all the time. Look how many sites that are aimed at privacy still insist on the lowest security settings on Tor Browser and demand scripts are run! That is so they track you and know your real ID. A lot of exit and middle nodes are run by GCHQ and NSA to play with. They can stain traffic going in to see where it comes out, so get the real IP that way. Two university students were threatened or paid not to give a talk on how to de-anonymise Tor users when they went to DEFCON. The talk was pulled as it would have revealed users can be traced easily and ruined the work of the security services. Tor Browser Bundle had firefox changed by developers - because they say it was not hacked - to facilitate Operation Onymous in 2014. Scripts were all set to run, but the program was like that from default instead of how it was previously with everything set to OFF. That was pressure being put on the team by Security Services and they rolled over. Then they allowed all scripts to be run no matter if the setting was on or off. Again, to keep police and security services happy because they were running exploits on Tor Users. You really can't trust anyone.
    4
  68. 4
  69. 4
  70. 4
  71. 4
  72. 4
  73. 4
  74. 4
  75. 4
  76. 4
  77. 4
  78. 4
  79. 4
  80. 4
  81. 4
  82. 4
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85. 4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 4
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 3
  98. 3
  99. 3
  100. 3
  101. 3
  102. 3
  103. 3
  104. 3
  105. 3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. 3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. There always seem to have been two storylines running in parallel with a lot of cases you see reported in the news and most follow the same template, so this is not about the name you mention, but what people often do and it applies to many cases that have been reported previously and concluded. The best advice is if you have done something, prolonging the agony of not just holding your hands up and admitting it makes you look worse. You also waste a lot of your own money, or that of other people. Anyone donating money that later claims to have been misled will then be against others. Think of the following fictional people A,B,C,D,E and fictional Company F and fictional Police in a case that is not real, but the wording used as an example only and bearing no resemblence to anyone named here or elsewhere or any case open or closed. Person A complained bitterly that Company F had a vendetta against them for no reason, picked them at random and had used/influenced police to arrest them for no reason, search property, take possible evidence away and make up false things between them to accuse Person A of as they think they are such a threat, they are best silenced. Person A tells everyone this as fact and finds a common ground or similar thing people do not like about Company F or police and works on that to steer everything away from them, on to police and Company F. That can lead to people being asked for a petition, campaign or even donation to fight the horrible police and Company F when it might really be used to cover their own legal fees or financial needs, particularly if they were in any debt. Persons B,C,D,E don't know each other and maybe complained to police that Person A had somehow behaved in a way that made them feel threatened and reported it to police with evidence and/or witnesses resulting in investigation and action. Person D was more annoyed, wanted to be left alone and went to the high court and got some sort of proceedings issued and suggested a huge figure and a promise to leave them alone and say no more or the action would continue against Person A. Person A then confused the police action for what they found themselves accused of for a completely different thing! They tried to twist it by claiming to be a victim and being attacked by random people from Company F and police. People will use all sorts of tricks to deflect a situation.
    2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. Nothing to do with knowing less about technology, it is quite often because they are glad to get a call and speak to someone. They just go along with what they are told. It's like when they get warned to lock doors and keep keys out of sight. They agree then leave doors unlocked and keys in view of letter boxes. One person said they had nothing to steal, another said no one hard arms that long and one said no one would go in if they were in the house. Despite all the warnings, people ignore them through genuine lack of mental capacity, or through greed and thinking they are more clever than the scammer and will teach them a lesson. I saw that with one lonely pensioner who went to prison for getting money for fake Travellers cheques in a post office for "friends". He kept the money, the post office called police and give a copy of his passport he had used. Loads of cases about disabled people scammed and trying to put pressure on police. What they didn't realise was that they could be jointly charged as they had committed fraud too. There are set groups that become victims and repeat victims - People lacking mental capacity, the only genuine victims as the rest agree to take part knowing the risks. People that are lonely and will do anything.to stay on the phone. People that are dishonest and think they are more clever than a scammer, but discover their dishonesty backfires. I see loads of victims and have even been to one of the bank fraud departments. One person called a victim., explained he had frozen the account due to fraud , give all the details and they just wouldn't accept it. This is happening all the time. If a customer Insists on ignoring advice and it is recorded, they do not just simply get a refund. It is their money they are wasting and not the banks.
    2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. It is inappropriate speed that can be just one factor of many in accidents and not always the fault of the driver. If a child was playing in the road on a 20mph limit and run after a ball for example, someone doing 20 might hit them, someone doing 30 would be past before they run out - it is not always a case of saying "too fast". You might also need to ask why a child was put at risk by parents. I have been at 137mph in one car in a 40mph limit and 155mph in a 70 limit. The 155 was inappropriate I thought due to other road users and time of day, but the 137 was appropriate because it was early hours of the morning and no one about on a road that would require a car ato reach and no pedestrians, homes or businesses nearby. I must say those speeds were allowed, not just some boy racer! Many people do not know how to control a car, that is why they crash. Many can only go fast in a straight line and take no account of what is around them. That's why you see so many idiots crashing BMW or Audi cars all the time, they rely on driver assistance but run out of talent. I think the ban was uncalled for unless the person keeps committing the same type of offence. What we have now is clueless Magistrates who volunteer for something to do in retirement, or have an axe to grind and are not legally qualified. There are a few exceptions, but the Judiciary do NOT have any respect for them and often have to sit on appeals to guide them in the errors of their ways, or call in to question what a Law Student thought was legal advice before telling them what sentence to give and letting them decide how bad the person looks. Why else would someone dress up for a hearing if it was only a hearing based on facts and evidence? Some probably give full sentences to burglars if their shed was broken in to for example! Others might not like speeders. What we have to watch for is busy-body Magistrates falling for character references which are all rubbish as every criminal is "honest and trustworthy", "looks after sick relative" or "suffers a disability and would find it hard to get around", maybe "unable to take children to ballet or football" and the "hardship" argument. Time and time again it just means a person couldn't care less about his or her family, job or home unless he or she is caught. Why are people still driving with 12 or more points by the way? Bent Staff or people charging not to add points? Rant over!
    1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. In Liverpool the council first started funnelling traffic after complaints from newly developed Albert Dock retail outlets that people were not spending enough and they were not getting as many visitors as promised. The first thing to happen was parking charges, people didn't bother stopping and went to nearby Cheshire Oaks retail park. Next the Council funnelled traffic past Albert Dock by putting "no U turn" and "no right turn" signs up at every traffic light and by closing off roads completely. People were forced to queue on the main road outside, which then made it impossible for people to get in and out! Less people went, retailers whinged and the council tried something else...they used timers on traffic lights, not road sensors. This was to try and say the area had congestion, one part of the road would be packed, but the next two junctions completely clear, so they interrupted traffic flow and restricted it. Later, the corrupt council staff were awarding contracts to companies they held interests in or family were involved in to narrow roads and ruin junctions. This happened 3 times without consultation with emergency services. They put a huge paved area in the middle of a main road that could have been bus and bike lanes and suggested people could use this space - then said they couldn't as they were in the middle of exhaust fumes and noise. Now the City Centre is gridlocked due to road closures and funnelling and other restrictions, all in time for congestion charges to try and get money back that was misused and stolen from taxpayers for the gain of others. The emergency services now can't get vehicles through the queues, the lanes were narrowed so people can no longer move to the sides and high kerbs were fitted to make sure people stayed in their lanes - so they can't even move. This will result in deaths and delays to incidents. I have lost count of the number of parked ambulances and fire engines with blue lights, all so a graduate can say, "oh look, I made a new road layout", but did not have any experience or knowledge as they don't teach that at university. People living in the area just kept agreeing to it all, voted for the same people as they were "nice people" - complete idiots. The locals all caused the mess they now object to. The council also lied about pollution and exhaust fumes. The councillors FORGOT about all the data DEFRA was collecting since the 1960s in every area of the UK, it showed pollutants and precise times of air quality samples. Liverpool Council were forced to retract false and misleading statements because of this and looked a bit stupid.
    1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. It is a legal requirement for site operators to know what they have operating as they get called when there is a problem. Any loss of service causes a problem and interference is a legal issue. Everything is licenced and the operators and RA check regularly. They also do spot checks. In the days of pagers around 94 i was at a hilltop site in Wales when the RA turned up to do field strength tests. A VHF pager was splattering and when i let them in the building they found the 10Watts from the TX was going via a 400Watt RF amp in to their own aerial on the mast - around 137MHz. They had the site owner and company rep there within 45mins and took the amp away. Had they not complied, the equipment was going to be switched off and removed. The way the sites work is that you have a few wideband VHF and UHF aerials for general use. You can use your own or you can use a wideband RX one for VHF and another for UHF and TX through your own. There are circulators fitted, but it depends what room is left. The old PMR repeaters would use a common receive aerial at the top of the masts and TX on their own. That's because the common aerial would be a 68-88MHz, 160-180MHz for example, or 440-460MHz, so never cut for one frequency, but good enough in that location. That was only one part of the mast and buildings. There were relays, links, commercial stations and 70cm / 2m repeaters in some. Now they have TETRA and Cellular. Sites i went to were never alarmed either. It was just a case of being issued with keys. One site had about 8 padlocks all joined to each other and wrapped around a gate, you opened your own to get in! Sadly, pirates would install equipment on some of them with 10GHz links, steal electric and splatter and interfere.
    1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. That's interesting to know. I had a few scams pulled by VM I reported to OFCOM. The first was I had an 18month contract for £40/month total. In month 14 they said they wanted £9 more, so now £49/month. I refused and said it's a fixed contract. They sent an amended contract i did not sign covering the 18m with a % reduction by each component in the package, so 3% off phone, 6% off TV, 2% off broadband. I refused to pay as this was a new contract and I had not agreed to this. They refunded the £36 they tried to scam. I told them i was not renewing, based on being told my bill would go to £76/month after this contract ended. Not renewing (not defined as "cancelling" as the contract was ending) proved impossible. Each staff member obstructed and lied to me and the first barrier was the "input the 2nd, 3rd, 5th letter of your password". That would not work anyway on a home phone. The next barrier was "can i have the email registered to your account". This is NOT your primary email, it is the one you supplied when you first purchased the VM services, so it could be an old gmail or yahoo one. After that they ask for a password, again, this is NOT for your primary email, it is one you set when you first purchased the services. How many remember it. Refuse to let them send you a link to go and reset it, this does not work. It is to get you off the phone. They also ask for a mobile number, once again that is whatever you give when you purchased the services or first signed up, it is not the one on your customer records! VirginMedia can not even see the number you are calling from to confirm you are at home. Once past that, if you can give the date of the last bill payment, amount and sort code, they will speak to you. Scamming dishonest staff work on a Bonus Scheme and have to meet Targets for sales and retention. They get discretionary discounts to apply at the start of the month. if customers get difficult, they give them an offer. Some without any left will transfer or cut them off to avoid being told off for not meeting targets. It took me around 8 hours of calls to finally get a disconnection date. I was not impressed, but the biggest scam VirginMedia is now pulling is one they use in other Indian Scam call centres. Two weeks after being sent my cancellation date by email, I got a text from VM asking me to "check your documents". I thought this would be about leaving, the final bill and how to return equipment. Clicking the link took me to to a site designed to auto-agree and auto-sign a NEW 18month contract. I didn't know at the time, it was 3 hours later I got a welcome to virginmedia and new contract. So some dishonest scammer in an Indian call centre that Virgin subcontract thought they would steal a bonus from Virginmedia by lying and saying I had asked for this new contract, then chose the wording for the text to deliberately mislead for the purpose of fraudulent activity. I then had to send all this to OFCOM again and start another complaint and then got harassed by Virginmedia with 153 calls to my home number and mobile in the month before disconnection. The staff also lied about which equipment to return, one advisor said, "just dispose of it, take it to your local recycling centre". The next email asked for the TV box and SuperHub2 and accessories. A further email asked for that equipment plus the SuperHub 3. The idea was to see me get a bill for non-return of equipment. I have since packaged everything up after asking for a return label and packaging. The date they set for receipt if collected by their courier was after the date they required, so they would try to charge. I packaged it and took it to a collection point and it has gone, but I also photographed every item in detail and took a video of the box being sealed so they can not say equipment was "missing". I am now having to go through the Small Claims court to recover £59.50 plus legal fees, claim issue cost plus interest as they will not give back the overpayment they took for the time AFTER they knew I would be disconnected.
    1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. Inflating tyres does FA, I tried it on diesel and petrol cars since 2004. All different makes. Over-inflation causes much more heat, poor handling and makes the car unstable. The same for the scam of eco-tyres or low rolling resistance tyres, they make NO difference to MPG. I would like to see the proof YOU have of the tests you conducted to support your claims as I suspect you are just reading bits on sites and repeating them as some sort of "fact". The most economical speed depends on engine RPM and surroundings, the car will not be much different at 30mph compared to 33mph providing you are in the correct gear and driving sensibly. Driving in 3rd at 30 will increase fuel consumption in a petrol as the RPM goes higher, but not always in a diesel, it can increase MPG by being in the correct gear. The same as if you tried using 5th at 30mph, the engine would throw much more fuel in. The accelerator is what is linked to your wallet. Learn to plan ahead, let the car roll in gear to red lights and get ready to move off again if they change, take your foot off the accelerator going down a hill - the car cuts the fuel. AVOID scammers telling you to fit these awful tuning boxes they lie and say increase MPG, they don't, for your $500-600 you are getting a $10 voltage multiplier that takes a reading to or from a component and increases it. In most cases all it does is increase the fuel pressure. On a diesel that causes clattering when cold due to excess diesel injected, then black smoke from all that diesel now injected incorrectly that isn't used for combustion, but burning off in the EGR, turbo, Manifold and DPF blocking it up. The same goes for scammers selling a REMAP, who would you trust more? A backstreet company or major manufacturer that spent millions on research and development. The car is already set how it should be for max economy, power and emissions. Some backstreet garage is NOT going to increase your MPG unless they fit a smaller engine or reduce performance by restricting fuel being injected so it uses less. THINK and learn about engines and don't be scammed so easily. Save money by using the car less, removing excess weight from it and change your driving style.
    1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. Tor is the biggest risk. I remember reading the docs years back about all the warnings such as "do not open downloaded files unless disconnected from the internet" and "do not run scripts". Later we found out how most people were caught through various techniques. One was files that had an odd extension, the computer would use VLC for example to go and fetch something, but this often caused an outbound connection and provided the ID of the user. Word and Excel documents, even a lot of JPG would cause the computer to connect outside Tor to a Law Enforcement IP. A lot of spyware was used too, people would click on anything in order to obtain something illegal. Users were watched on their own webcams, remote access tools were used too. In 2013 TorProject complied with an Order from Law Enforcement to assist them with identifying users. Around October/November a modified version of Tor was put on the site for download and marked as an update. To facilitate Operation Onymous, Tor Project had set privacy to low and allowed all scripts to run. This is what law enforcement needed to identify computers and IPs going to various sites. The version I downloaded from TorProject had a "Profiler Trojan" built in and my complaints were dismissed about why this was being distributed. It was for Law Enforcement. Last year we all found out that despite being set to high privacy, ALL scripts were still running on every site to assist Law Enforcement. This had been going on for some time. This is why I no longer trust Tor or the people behind the project if they are being ordered to manipulate software and put people at risk.
    1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. This is the problem that the Storeton TV TX had when it first went online. Locals got no signal and it was a big story in the newspapers, but a bit further away it was full strength. It was the wrong type of antenna in use. Once changed to tilt the radiation pattern down correctly, it covered the required areas. It was an example of poor design and understanding of RF. People think RF comes straight out and all around. It doesn't, it can be steered and set at different angles depending what the installation is for. That's why phone masts tilt the radiation pattern down to give a more blanket coverage with a lower range. The same for broadcast stations, you don't want a fancy 6dB colinear with a 30-35degree takeoff , you want a simple aerial like a slim jim, J pole or mixed polarisation dipole that will cover the local area and not win a DX award. Sometimes people will get NO signal or a very low one due to multipath interference, two of the signal arriving at the same time effectively trying to cancel each other out! That can be rectified by moving the aerial, or in some cases fitting two aerials and a splitter and messing with them. I used to have two very long Group C/D aerials pointing at Winter Hill to get OnDigital when it first come out. I tried them phased side by side, then stacked for more gain one above the other etc. To get shut of multipath I spaced them side by side and then moved one aerial back about 2ft and it cured it. I also fitted a masthead preamp to overcome coax losses. There are lots of interesting things you can do with aerials.
    1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. VirginMoney is just as bad, due to dishonest staff trying to destroy the Brand and company. I had a ISA with VirginMoney that matured in April 2020. I logged on to check the amount and set it to pay out to my nominated account as the ISAs had dropped to 0.001% and I found a saving account for 0.4% which was high back then. Everyone was dumping their ISAs. VirginMoney blanked out the option and would not let me change the bank details, I had changed my current account in January 2020. After many calls and complaints I got a call back from a VirginMoney woman working from home one Saturday morning. She was a scammer! She had gone through accounts and complaints and set me as a target. She had her VirginMoney mobile and computer, plus her own phone and computer at home. She first called on the VM phone and asked me to log in and check my details. I said it was still faulty. 1 hour later I got a call on a random mobile from the same woman at VirginMoney, she asked me to log in and said to prove it was me she was speaking to, i would get a text with a number to give her. Really! What she did was a password reset on my account to generate the authentication code sent to my mobile. Had I read that number out, she would have changed my password, put a new nominated account in after she fixed it, then sent the money abroad and asked me to wait for the system to update in a few hours and try again. By that time, the VirginMoney lines would be closed and my account would show someone logging in after resetting the password with security code to my mobile and clearing the account of funds. Only the initial call would be recorded, not the one on the personal mobile. It was a clever attempted scam I could have fallen for had I not watched JimBrowning11 scam videos. Local police were not interested, VirginMoney said no such thing took place as it was "not recorded" despite the call record on my phone and her home IP logging in etc. VirginMoney has no dedicated fraud line, it is only for credit and debit cards. ActionFraud are muppets and don't investigate unless instructed by paypal or the victims are police, or people considered high profile. It is a few people working in one room.
    1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. How do you represent someone that you must know is guilty from the evidence abailable? Don't say you don't know or that it doesn't matter what you think etc - the reason no one believes anyone is guilty is because the longer it goes on the more they are paid. Novel research used to be a good earner, that was all stopped as people used to charge this regularly for things that were not unique or unusual areas of Law. Most people don't know a Barrister can be attending various hearings each day, they could do a 15min bail hearing at 10am, then a mention hearing, then a few plea hearings, maybe start a trial and do a few more bits and pieces...if they are not making any money, they do not appear to have good clerks at chambers. They are not organising the hearings very well. Maybe someone should post a list of fees claimed for the different types of hearings, how long they are allowed for each and how many of each during the day and a week. I know Barristers that were being paid up to £800 per day - QCs were being paid up to £750K a year. I have NO sympathy for people on a good wage, or people trying to mislead the public by stating they only earn £200 a week... That would be payment for 3-4 15min hearings on one day. Maybe the barristers complaining they are not being paid what they feel they deserve should post their true claim details. One very famous barrister used to complain he didn't make enough in a day to cover his cigars. A lot of Barristers sit as part time Judges or Recorders and get paid extra for this. Many Judges own Barristers Chambers as partners with others, so it is in everyones interest to have hearings organised and run a certain way. People running chambers take a cut of the money. Even Clerks working in chambers are being paid £45-60K a year and i really doubt Barristers would work for less than them.
    1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. That I really doubt. No one would sit through a case knowing they could not hear or follow what was going on, they would say something and a Judge would order a fix of the system or alternative system or appointment of someone such as a lipspeaker or sign language person. The loop system in a courtroom is via infrared to stop people sitting outside and using devices to listen in. The headphones you would have been given would have been tested each day and batteries charged overnight and faults fixed within a day, there are many alternative items to use and if you HAD said you were unable to hear, the Judge would have simply moved to a new courtroom and tested the equipment again. Most is Sennheisser equipment, so not cheap. If the problem was with your hearing and you did not have any devices to correct it, such as hearing aids, then you would have been asked if you had any special needs well before any hearing and arrangements made. If you could provide no medical evidence of this, then you would be seen as just using this as an excuse to delay proceedings or to try and avoid justice. Defendants WILL use any excuse they can think of, including "I didn't understand", "couldn't hear", "didn't follow" etc etc. Most would not have all their self diagnosed problems if they were found not guilty. If there are genuine needs, they are catered for. People do NOT lose a case because of a GENUINE disability or medical condition, everyone is given fair and full access to justice, often at great expense to the public to allow that person to be treated fairly. I don't actually believe a word of what you say.
    1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. If you go around any large City and speak to the charities that deal with the people on a daily basis they will explain it clearly to you. Think about where all those fake homeless people went during lockdown...they went home. Most businesses and councils offer places and say there is no reason for a second night on the streets, but people refuse this help as they are fakes and frauds. The people you see on the streets are not homeless, the charities know them and know where they are living and about their substance misuse problems. For most of them it is a lifestyle choice, they leave the YMCA hostel in the morning, get their drugs, sit about begging all day and go back at night. Some will even abuse charities by getting free meals and anything else they can. Most have places in hostels and are sadly under the control of criminal gangs. If you give the people money or help them stay on the streets YOU are the problem, you are helping to put them in danger. I used to get the train in to a City Centre and a few people would get on with their full kit and dog and set up outside the railway station, they used to fight with others over who had which place. They changed around midday and went home at night. The Chief Constable was on a phone-in and said he knew the criminal gangs controlled people and they did nothing. The gangs will send people out to beg for money all day and in return will supply crack and heroin. If you have evidence of charities NOT spending donations on what they claim, let's all hear it. Name the charities that are not helping people and give them a right to reply. They will provide proof of who they repeatedly offer help to and who refuses it because they are FakeHomeless and choose to lead that drug fuelled lifestyle.
    1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. The Police investigation ruled out mechanical failure, distraction from phones etc and interaction with other vehicles just before the coach left the road. A number of lines of enquiry would be followed to study the driving before the crash - using the vehicle data to recreate the journey and show the position of all controls. The coach camera system would be viewed too. The police would have requested blood samples from the hospital for testing for drink and drugs, but nothing was found as no evidence of drink or legal or illegal drugs that could have impaired driving were found as there was no evidence produced to the Coroner at the Inquest. The postmortem failed to find any existing medical conditions as none were presented to the Coroner as evidence in the Inquest. GP records would be requested to look at the mental health of the driver, but nothing of interest was presented as evidence to the Coroner for the Inquest hearing. The family claimed the driver had suffered from some sort of medical condition at the time of the accident, but were told not to talk to the press and did not elaborate on what they thought it was. The postmortem found nothing. This could lead to two possibilities, a mental health condition - but the GP records did not show this, or he simply fell asleep as he was tired. This is looking like a more likely explanation in the absence of ANY medical findings. If he had medical problems he would have been prevented from driving anyway, so I can see why the Coroner is trying to protect families involved, but it is not correct to do this and withhold information.
    1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. I see the Just Stop Oil protestors as a large group of vulnerable people that are being coercively controlled and manipulated by a few people for their own gain. If you look at the average profiles, you have people with mental health or learning issues, people that do not want to work, people that could never be employed, bored pensioners, students that are not doing so well and need a way out of their courses etc. They are targeted and then manipulated and coercively controlled. Why is the organiser not prosecuted for being responsible for what many see as a terrorist organisation? If I was to encourage people to commit criminal acts, I would also be held liable. So who is funding Just Stop Oil and what is in it for Government Ministers? We have already seen they are in bed with Serco and use RNLI as a chartered boat service to fill up hotels and get paid. Has anyone investigated Just Stop Oil? I remember in the 70s we were told oil and gas would run out, then we had some nonsense about the ozone layer, then it was something about icebergs melting, then we moved on to removing natural ingredients from food so manufacturers could save money and tell fat people it wasn't their fault for over-eating and not doing any exercise... Now we are being told more rubbish, as that is all it is. The younger people drawn in to cults like this don't research and don't remember all previous lies. Older people are in such a state they don't remember what day it is. What a sad time we are living in,
    1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496.  @ConquerDriving  My last 3 cars all had Normal/Comfort, ECO and full load. Petrol and diesels. ECO was 39psi, comfort/normal (up to 3 people) was 33psi and full load was about 44psi. Nothing about 4/5 people and full load. When i picked the cars up from new they all had 39psi, each time i lowered it to 33psi the garage put it back to 39psi stating tyres were underinflated on the service! 33psi is OK, I used to get 55mpg in a diesel in town, but with a petrol get 33mpg, so very disappointing. The diesel went because the DPF kept blocking despite motorway runs (after 10,000miles) and the dealership set the car to regenerate every 300miles which caused more errors and wasted fuel, also caused more servicing and replacement of glowplugs etc. 39PSI does make the petrol car "bounce" and I every bump and lines on the road, it also feels better cornering at speed - but I never drive it to that extent, it can also mean more suspension damage over uneven roads with holes in as the tyre can't flex and absorb some impact, so you get a harsh thud. At 39psi it is more likely to just burst compared to 33psi. There is NO difference to fuel economy between 33psi and 39psi in any petrol or diesel i have driven over the last 15years. I still get the same readings. That is with different sized tyres on the cars. The only safety difference is that 39PSI can prevent aquaplaning as experienced on motorways, this is due to less of the tyre being in contact with the road. If you run through standing water with 33PSI that tyre works so hard to displace all the water and can't. 39PSI alters the shape and contact and is more effective. Try it in heavy rain.
    1
  497. All the parking tickets or permits I have seen clearly state, as do disabled badges, "this must be positioned clearly the correct way up in the windscreen and be clearly visible". What would you have done if they said that although you had the permit showing on the seat, it was not as required, "on the dashboard" . I had an encounter with a Council contracted parking enforcement person that issued a ticket to a vehicle that was parked on Crown Property! The parking enforcement person had no right to come on to the property and was removed as soon as he was noticed by Security Staff and Armed Police Officers. He then called the police to report Security and the officers in attendance who said it was not public property, or public land, it was indeed Crown Property and private. Access was restricted and he was breaking various Laws by being on the property and not leaving on the instruction of armed officers. His argument was that I had crossed a paved public area to access the parking area via automatic bollards and he did not think I should be allowed to do. There were NO notices stating access was not allowed or that people with pre-arranged permission to have the bollards lower on approach were not allowed to cross a 30ft pedestrian area to reach the Crown Property Land in a vehicle. The police did try explaining this to him, but he persisted and I had to appeal it. My first letter was rejected, I actually had to obtain various letters stating the vehicle I was in was registered with the Council to lower the bollards, prove I was contracted to work at that time, pay for plans of the area from HM Land Registry and submit this all with photos and old photos from Google Earth showing there are NO signs restricting access to anyone, or any vehicle at any time. This took months to resolve and finally the Council cancelled the parking fine and said their decision, although based on the evidence I had provided and that of their own Council Staff, plus HM Land Registry, set no precedent and they would continue to ticket vehicles on this land - in the full knowledge they have no right to do so. They don't own it, have no permission to be on it and anyone going on to it can be prosecuted as it is a restricted area. I think it was 4 months from the date of the fine that I had my letter stating it was cancelled. I provided all the evidence within 2 days and it was ignored. The Council couldn't understand they didn't own every piece of Land or road and were not aware of how the bollards operated, who was able to use them for work purposes and which land their contracted staff should avoid.
    1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. They're all scared, they have to go along with everyone else. Look at the "anti-slavery" stuff we had recently, out of nowhere, companies were putting these big meaningless statements out and on their sites - no one reads them. It was just because they were scared of "not conforming" or being told they would be labelled. People want to keep their jobs so agree. Companies, UK GOV and NHS are being coercively controlled as a social experiment. If you go on a few web sites, people have competitions about what they can get people to do next. We had all the LGB stuff, we had the anti-slavery, what will it be next? How about we all think of something completely silly and start campaigning or shaming companies, GOV UK, NHS in to adopting a policy, making statements, paying a lot of money for courses and training and then employment of staff to deal with the new policies... This is exactly what has been happening. It's also happened with the 20MPH speed limits. Local councils were all afraid and joined in, now we have a new national speed limit of 20MPH. Most accidents and people killed on roads and pavements are under 20MPH if you look at the unmanipulated stats, just as most are in car parks, by traffic lights, within 30ft of crossings people refuse to use and are often elderly or impaired people. It would have been cheaper to keep teaching people about personal responsibility for their own safety and warning what happens when they don't use crossings or walk out in front of vehicles in some arrogant kind of way thinking they will stop. This nonsense even resulted in a change to the Highway Code! You don't need to be responsible as you're a victim and you can claim compensation if you cause your own accident and injuries by choice.
    1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. From whistleblowers, they work on a bonus scheme and have to meet targets for customer retention and sales. They will suddenly have very low audio so you give up and call back, which means they get away with it, or suddenly make it difficult to understand them so you give up. Strange how the music is LOUD. They get told off if they can not keep a customer, they get paid a bonus if they keep someone and get so many discounts at the start of the month they can apply. They will not want to downgrade or disconnect at the end of the month or they get paid less. Every excuse will be used to put you off, including suggesting extra charges because you have called too soon or too late etc. The whole CALL WAIT is caused by the scamming call centre staff subcontracted by virginmedia - they are hoping a 45min wait BEFORE they answer any calls will put people off and they will give up. When a call goes through to the "we do not manage our business correctly, so you might have to wait a log time before you can speak to anyone" message, staff are just sitting there ignoring calls watching people hang up. Waiting times are worse at the end of the month. if you really want to annoy VirginMedia, and have time to spare, keep calling them and disconnecting, it destroys their stats. The people I spoke to FORGOT to mute the mics and were playing cards and speaking about customers in Hindi. Just think, the same people working for a company subcontracted by VM could be the same people scamming others from the same call centre. If you ask for a Manager to call back, they don't, if you ask to speak to one, you can't as they refuse. If a member of staff says they are putting you on hold to speak to a Manager, they are lying to you as they don't work in India.
    1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. How about a video on Data Protection and Retention Laws, maybe UK in general and UK Internet Company compared to a VPN company registered and operated from British Virgin Islands or other location that is very difficult to deal with legally. By using a VPN, you agree to them doing what they want with your personal data. You have no control over who stores it, where it is stored, who can access it and for what purpose, or who customer profiles might be sold to. How would you stop a VPN from collecting all the data flowing through their system, profiling users and selling it, or steering your traffic to the websites owned by the highest bidder. There are no Laws in countries they register in and operate from for this reason. They are known as "law-less" countries. A VPN is not needed for most people, exactly WHAT do you think sharing all your personal details, banking information, emails, banking sites and general browsing is going to do if you volunteer all this to a company and pay them to take it! Don't connect to unknown WiFi, there is no need as everyone has 4G/5G now. Your IP number is only one of a few hundred ways your identity is tracked around the Internet every day. If you do want a secure VPN Tunnel, you can go in to your Home Router and switch on the VPN Server, then copy the code in to the OpenVPN App for your computer and phone. That means no matter where you are, you connect home securely and use your own Internet connection, so always appear to be at home. An alternative is a raspberry pi with PiVPN running on it, very easy to do. Use the Wireguard App on your computer or phone, connect back home from anywhere securely and use your own internet. VPNs are throttled by ISPs now, they also repurpose other home users systems to connect out on if you are not busy and route traffic via your home system, so other users assume your IP. This is used to connect people to BBCi, ITV, Netflix etc as ALL VPN IPs are blocked by major services. You might also need to do a show on consumer rights and refunds if people are thinking of signing up to a VPN in a Law-Less country. I dare you to try and cancel a VPN, see how far you get as that 30 day guarantee is not as clear as it seems. Many people complain stating it is ignored.
    1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. Oh dear, another clueless boy racer! Who do you trust more - a company that spends millions on research and development, or a backstreet trader that makes wild claims in order to take your money? The best parts for the car are fitted when you buy it and you're not going to turn a 1.2 or 1.4 or 1.6 in to a racing car. 1. Increased fuelling. Absolute rubbish, you can't as the ECU stops this, so it doesn't matter what you think you are doing to the car or even what you try, it will still go back to what it should be based on the dynamic adjustment from sensor readings. Fuel rail pressures can be messed with using a cheap nasty "tuning box" often costing £400 even though it contains a simple voltage multiplier costing 23p! Those devices take NO input from the ECU or send info back, all they do is increase fuel pressure by a set amount. They go in series with the fuel rail and damage the engine, especially when cold and more diesel is sent in, the box causes even more to go in and causes smoke and clattering. You would need a proper ECU REMAP and who would you trust doing that? Some youtuber that just increases everything from standard without any real knowledge. Don't forget, those companies will never pay up if you damage your engine! It is also possible to insurance and police investigators to find evidence of using such devices as that info can not be deleted from the ECU - it is accessed in investigations all the time. Manufacturers also refuse to honour warranty claims and you void your insurance anyway. 2. The air intake! Biggest way to make money from fools is to sell them a tiny mesh/oil or foam filter that doesn't even filter and is a much smaller surface area than a paper filter, so ends up blocking up and degrading performance far quicker, plus it doesn't pass anywhere near the amount of filtered air to the engine. There is also a sales opportunity for cleaning solutions, you will have to clean it every few months. If you had a paper filter it could still pass more filtered air until it was nearly blocked. People will remove resonators due to not knowing what they do, they cancel out noise on the intake, they do not restrict anything. The pipes and inlet are the correct size and the standard system fitted to cars passes more air than the engine requires at full RPM. 3. The exhaust, another way to get money from gullible fools. You can spend what you like and it will make NO difference to performance. All it will do is make the car sound rubbish and everyone will look around thinking someone is driving with a hole in their exhaust and see a small car doing 20mph. 4. Suspension. Don't just throw kits on without getting the suspension geometry checked or you upset the handing. People are so clueless they call a DAMPER a shock absorber. The shock absorber on a car is the SPRING itself, the DAMPER is what keeps the wheel/tyre in contact with the road. Lowered suspension is bad on a family car as it can make handling unpredictable and is often the cause of many accidents. Lowering a ride height might look nice, but does nothing for handling. Many boy racers grow out of it after being scammed for years. Many feel stupid after spending all that money for years and having a car that is slower and noisier than standard, plus costs more to insure and the handling is rubbish. Use the VW approach and fit a fake engine noise generator - in the Golf it has a thing called a SOUNDAKTOR under the bonnet to make the occupants hear the noise of a V8. Switch that off and the Golf sounds like any other car inside!
    1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588.  @ToomasTelling  DABradio is finished in the UK, it failed because of - 1. Advertisers 2. Poor Audio Quality 3. Choice of different stations When it first appeared, the audio quality was brilliant as bitrates were high, some as high as 320kbps stereo on the BBC test stations. As time went on, it was all monetised and people looked at ways to get back their investment and make money. It went away from being a method of transmitting stations to one of selling advertising, making every channel play automated music with adverts and a bit of talking over the top. Many of my local DAB stations play the same music from the same feed, but change the announcements. Why just have 4 stations on a multiplex for example, when you would have 12 or 24 all running really low audio bitrates. That is why no one listens now. Who wants MONO audio at a bitrate and audio quality lower than a standard AM radio. In North West UK if you listen at home or in a car to stations on 88-108MHz FM Stereo, the audio quality is really good. Listen on DABradio and you get thin or tinny MONO with 16kbps to 64kbps and it is "quiet", plus there is no processing, no dynamic range, no compression etc, so unusable in cars. Most stations rely on streaming. DABradio was a "gap filler" while Streaming Services were improved and people started to use them more thanks to unlimited data on phones etc. I now just stream music in the car, I don't bother with DABradio and only use normal radio if there is no coverage on the phone! The choice of frequency up around 200MHz was odd too, if they had used 68-88MHz the coverage would have been vastly improved, especially for mobile use. Less transmitters and links would have been required. I use 4M amateur band (70MHz) and the coverage is really good compared to 2m and 70cm for example.
    1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1