Youtube comments of Jorge O (@jorgeo4483).

  1. 17
  2. 17
  3. 12
  4. 11
  5. 10
  6. 9
  7. 9
  8. 9
  9. 7
  10. 7
  11. 7
  12. 7
  13. 6
  14. From the fenice Y-span-ya "Land of the forge of metals" not rabbits, all civilizations came here for metals (if you think about it is stupid to name an enormous territory just by rabbits, common in all Europe, Hispania gave the 80% of metals to Rome. Another common misconception is this: Mixtures with Arabs were prohibited with the penalty of death, by both parties, with some exceptions such as slaves, generally for harems or in high classes to seal an agreement. There is a mistake regarding the relationship of lineages in North Africa. In addition to Romans there, the three Germanic tribes expelled from Hispania by the also germanic Visigoths (foederati) and Hispano-Romans ended up in Morocco, Vandals, Suevi and Alans, these lineages may be common. So they have part of our genetics. Basques and Navarros hardly participated in the Reconquista, if you consult the INE website to search for their surnames in the south you will hardly find them. There are other reasons for finding important surnames from the north in the south; Charles III, for example, sent a large part of the rebel nobility to the south of the peninsula. We must not forget that many knights also came from all over Christendom. My family, of noble origin, arrived from Venice in 1462. Curiously, the Roman heritage is already very scarce in Spain, here the population was assimilated by the empire, becoming Romanized and only the soldiers and administrators who wanted to obtained their land dowry after military service. The majority of Spanish heritage is therefore Visigothic, by far. In Galicia you can find a lot of Breton heritage that escaped from the Franks (9th and 11th centuries), there is even a region called Britonia (Bretoña-Lugo) where there were several villages where until the 90s Breton was still spoken by the elderly.
    5
  15. 5
  16. 5
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 4
  22. 4
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115.  @kevwhufc8640  Uhm? You still don't have an exact idea. All of America was Spain, except for a small part of present-day Brazil, which later also inherited Spain along with all the Portuguese possessions in Africa, India, China and Portugal itself, half of Europe, we discovered Australia and Papua New Guinea 200 years before Cook although we do not claim it. We even had a commercial and religious colony in Japan with the permission of its emperor. Philippines, Guam, Mariana Islands in the Pacific. All of that, except for two protectorates, were provinces of Spain, their citizens were Spanish, they were not colonies. Only a few sales were made, such as La Florida to France (still waiting for the money) or Las Marianas to Germany. Spanish cessions or resignations were made to the United States in times when we had more serious problems to face. The USA obtained 65% of the territory of Mexico in its war after its independence and we had to cede other territories to them in a treasonous war of false flag, which began the empire of the United States of Overseas, generally based on military pressure and creation of bases, following the "Monroe Doctrine", since when they were a nation they no longer had anything to distribute around the world. By the way, San Francisco is still called San Francisco or "Frisco", like when we Spaniards founded it, you have songs by Scott McKenzie, Chris Isaak, among others. And it wouldn't be the USA if Spain hadn't kept Russia away from Alaska and California, which was very attractive to them. Nor would the USA be independent if it weren't for Spain, even if they paid us so badly.
    1
  116. 1
  117.  @kevwhufc8640  Ok, you have a good attitude to learning. Most of what we studied in my time was much more demanding than now. In most countries, more emphasis was placed on technical subjects, in Spain or Italy the humanistic subjects were fundamental, because they teach you to understand human beings and their works from the bottom of things. That's why at the age of 7 here you learned in a good school all the capitals of the world or the capitals of the 50 States of the USA, main cities and geographical features, the majority of Spaniards of my generation know more history or literature, philosophy, geography, etc. . than the inhabitants of other countries about their own. I studied the entire history of the United Kingdom, the USA, Russia, etc. We necessarily read Hamlet or King Lear at school. For a Spaniard it is a matter of principles to defend our history. Think that for centuries and until today we have not only had to fight against all the powers practically alone, but also against the Black Legend, invented by the Italians, English, Dutch and French. You are right, we are the oldest nation in Europe and with an impressive and very unknown history. Since you are with Rome, also read about Trajan, Hispanic, with him Rome reached its maximum extension, Hadrian, Hispanic as well, one of the five emperors considered good or Theodosius, also Hispanic, with whom the Universal Roman Empire ended and Christianity began. , declared official. I had to translate The Gallic Wars from Latin when I was 14 years old. And yes, the Cid was a real character, there are some facts that are somewhat exaggerated and others with an importance that could not be predicted at the time, but he was a great warrior, to the point that the Muslims themselves left writings about him.
    1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. To the autor: Spain, under Franco, is the only country in the world that defeated communism in war. Franco's regime was not nazism or fascism, it was National Catholicism, based on the purest values ​​of the West. The economy was based on autarky caused by the economic isolation fostered by the traitorous and anarcho-communist government in exile, a government that also came to power by rigging the elections and with several coups d'état in addition to violence unleashed on conservative Spain, which included shootings of thousands of prisoners including children for ideological, class and religious reasons, looting, burning of churches and convents, rape of nuns, murders, including opposition leaders and even crucifixions and torture in the so-called chekas, centers illegal detention. After defeating the communist hordes, overcoming the blockade, preventing Spain from entering the World War, convincing the allies of the legitimacy of the government and not receiving a Marshall Plan, the Spanish economy began to grow more than double that of the rest of the west world, including the USA and reaching eighth position in the world in record time ahead of Italy. This included repopulation plans in the interior, communications, ports, dams, trains, airports, 8 million officially protected or free homes, thousands of public schools and hundreds of universities with a much higher level than the current one. Depopulation is precisely a recent phenomenon, especially due to the decline in the birth rate, the abandonment of the different socialist governments and the search for urban living conditions and the lack of competitiveness of Spanish agriculture with distant countries that do not pay tariffs for unfair competition. Socialism also mortgaged Spanish industry in exchange for financing from the German socialism to achieve power. The Government of Felipe González in the 80s dismantled 34% of the industry to leave it at 23%. Furthermore, the tax pressure went from being almost zero during the Franco regime to taking more than 50% of per capita income, higher burdens than in the Nordic countries. During Franco's 36 years, 1.6 million Spaniards left Spain, almost all of them to return, without or with very basic studies, with agreements with other countries through the Spanish Emigration Institute, although in Spain there was work to give away. These people went without a criminal record, with a round trip ticket paid in case they were left without a job in Germany, Switzerland, etc. They were all praised. They had families of 8 children, with free studies, an apartment paid in 5 years, vacations, their first car and they could leave the door open. In 3 years of Zapatero's socialist government, more than 3 million left Spain, on their own, after training for free even in several careers, in a Spain without the slightest future and with no intention of returning. Many doctors go to GB to collect a nurse's salary, without wanting children or even without a partner. Now the Moors occupy the grandmas houses, we can't change cars and the government itself robs you.
    1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. @illiterate Autor: 1- Because Spain had to endure the continuous plundering of England and its allies. 2- Because Spain had to endure the inflation and usury of the Dutch and Genovese Jewish bankers. 3- Because the Spanish Civilizing Empire, the largest in history, did not have colonies, it had provinces and viceroyalties, we did not exploit like the other powers. 4- Because Spain left a gigantic legacy in its empire, in the largest and best planned cities of its time, its churches, its universities, its hospitals, its fortresses, its tremendous infrastructure works, etc. 6. Because Spain only brought from America the so-called Quinto Real, the tax in gold and silver that any Spaniard paid and were exempt from others. 7- Because the Spanish Empire was not a slaveholder. 8- Four of the countries of the Spanish Empire were first powers. 9- Because Spain financed your country's War of Independence, ignorant, trained and equipped your army, declared war on England, gained the support of France and won some of the most important battles for you. Spain was the fourth gold reserve in the world (Stolen by the fraudulent republican government) in 1936. And with all that was sunken and belongs to us is the first today. After not having a Marshall Plan and an unjustifiable economic block worse than Cuba's for 20 years, Spain had the record of economic growth in the West, during the Franco era not surpassed by any nation, neither China nor the USA. England ruined its wool, mining and grain production thanks to India and the USA and Canada and that while starving them.
    1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. Another one with the same problem, I think I already commented on your channel, yes, Sicily was ruled by Spain and was an Alan kingdom and was also ruled by the Normans. The Normans ARE NOT SCANDINAVIAN, they were from Normandy, where you landed on "D-Day". Their Duke, William I was recognized as king of the Normans by the king of France and invaded England, ruling as William II The Conqueror, taking power from the Saxons. Their language was Romance, similar to French, and they were not all blonde like the Scandinavians. It is true that in Sicily there were more migrations than in other places but we must distinguish between migrant peoples, dominant peoples, static population stratum and racial mixture. Racial mixing has very rarely occurred in Europe or anywhere else, racial mixing is contrary to human instinct, this is reason for another series of videos. The Roman Empire and the Spanish Empire are two extraordinary cases in history. This teacher could be my son, he has no experience nor has he been taught history correctly, he has been taught a history full of prejudices, not reality. In any case, I am Spanish, I can distinguish practically any Italian or Portuguese. If you put us in a group more. Of course, in northern Italy there are more blondes, like in Spain I grow blonde, then I was brown like Sean Connery or George Clooney, we can be brothers, he the ugliest, I have clear eyes and now my hair is white and all my family the same (and we come from Venice in the 15th century), all European blondes passed through the Balkans at some point in history. The Susex, the oldest noble house in England, were cousins ​​of King Allaric the Great, expelled from the family for traitors, the one who took over (and abandoned Rome when he could not administer it), that is, Goths, like those who invaded Sweden, Norway and Spain. In Spain there was no mixing with Moors and they were here for 800 years, it was prohibited with the death penalty on both sides. You have black blonde, you are not a typical sicilian, not for your skin color, it is for your mouth, yor superciliary arch, your teeth, you proportions, your hair, even your expressions. Do you realize that your lips are twice as thick as those of the average European?
    1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265.  @pf1402  Pues verás, no te voy a explicar mi c.v. porque es más de lo que eres capaz de leer en un día pero lo que no sé es qué significa tu diatriba tras mi comentario, que evidentemente no has descifrado. Mira, sé más de la Patagonia que tú pero además te diré una cosa, el vídeo explica que calculan que ese árbol debe tener unos 5.000 años porque han extraído una cata hasta la mitad de su radio y tiene unos 2.500 anillos. Esto lo entiende un niño, no uno de la Patagonia pero de otros lugares sí. Bueno, pues eso quiere decir que ese árbol, siendo un alerce, es decir un ciprés, está próximo a morir. En España tenemos el segundo árbol más viejo de Europa, un cedro de 1.481 años, es decir, sabemos su edad exacta y no tenemos un centro con varios enchufados estudiándolo. Tenemos un centro que se dedica a muchas otras cosas que tiene catalogados todos los árboles catalogables que hay en España, te das cuenta de la pequeña diferencia no? El más antiguo de América está en California, es un Junípero de más de 4.500 años, se sabe también su edad exacta. El vuestro no se sabe la edad exacta porque sois muy expertos. Pero aún así, para que te hagas una idea el más viejo de Europa tiene 9.550 años, también se sabe su edad exacta, es decir, al año exacto, está en Suecia y por último hay tres más viejos en el mundo cuya localización solo se da a científicos, el más viejo como conté, si pisas un retoño te matan en ese país. Ninguno aporta ninguna información esencial sobre el clima, precisamente si hubiese un cambio demasiado significativo habrían muerto. Para ver cambios en el clima a nivel mundial se empieza a leer en tramos de 10.000 años. ¿Te enteras o es demasiado texto para ti? Aquí en España tenemos miles de olivos milenarios también, miles. Uh no lo sabías, oh, ah!!! Venga a mascar hojas de coca, patagónica.
    1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270.  @vascomartins334  The Canary Islands were always part of the Kingdom of Castile. In the Treaty of Zamora 1143, when Castile-León recognized Portugal, it had not ceded the rights of any territory that had not been Portuguese, therefore the Canary Islands remained Castilian since Portugal did not exist as a nation and had previously been visited by French, Italians and Pliny himself spoke about them although not first hand, they are mentioned by Boccacio and Dante. The Genovese Lanzarotto Malocello is considered its discoverer, since he placed it for the first time on a map and wrote it in a Report in Mallorca. In the Treaty of Tordesillas, Portugal made the measurements from Cape Verde, not from the Canary Islands because they were Spanish. But they should have measured from Portugal, they cheated. The Portuguese, like the rest, had no idea of ​​the existence of America, if they had they would have gone for it and would have saved traveling 80% of the planet to trade with "The Indies". Columbus himself died convinced that he had reached them, not America. In fact, he did not name them as a continent. The name America was given by a German geographer, Martín Waldseemüller, in the first map that included it, in honor of "Americo Vespucio", a Florentine who later became a Spanish citizen, who was the first to realize that the New World was not "The Indies." . The Treaty of Tordesillas did not divide the world in two, because other divisions already existed, what it did was limit the claims of the new discoveries of the two powers, Spain and Portugal. That's why all of America except for a small strip was Spain. "All new lands and those yet to be discovered."
    1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289.  @antonioalcazar5749  El pelo pelirrojo procede de los neanderthales, eso no quiere decir que no los haya por ahí perdidos. Contra la creencia popular de que Irlanda y Holanda son los países con más pelirrojos, oh sorpresa, es España. En España, la población pelirroja es del 2%, algo más elevado que la media mundial: un 1,5% de la población. En Añora, un municipio de Córdoba, encontramos la tasa más alta de pelirrojos en nuestro país: un 10% de los noriegos (así se conoce el gentilicio de esta localidad) tiene el pelo de este color. También hay negros pelirrojos, pero pueden tener genes de fuera o relacionados con el albinismo, puedes buscar "negros pelirrojos" en google. Una cosa son los haplotipos, los genotipos y otra los fenotipos, cómo se expresan los genes. Los españoles somos casi clavados a los alemanes y también casi idénticos a todos los franceses y británicos con mezcla irlandesa, inglesa y bretona en el norte, excepto los vascos, que son judíos, los únicos iberos que quedan en España, es decir, los más españoles de los españoles, de hecho las lenguas vascas es ibero, pero eso no quiere decir que tengamos tantos rubios, porque eso es una adaptación rápida al clima. De hecho mis hijos y yo mismo nacimos más rubios que mi familia sueca, yo de hecho tenía el pelo casi blanco, luego se tornó marrón en la pubertad, moreno y ahora blanco otra vez. Mi padre tenía ojos grises, yo verdes y en la familia materna había varios de ojos azules. La mayoría de españoles, especialmente la mitad norte nacemos rubios.
    1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1