Comments by "TheRezro" (@TheRezro) on "Whatifalthist" channel.

@HANUMAN7454 It is more likely to be other way around, if NATO actually bother to deliver anti-radiation missiles. Spamming Iranian Drones is not legit tactic.
5
Minor correction. In western countries people live longer, so drop in population is not as severe as it seams. And largely is due to higher cost of one person. So despite drop in numbers, actual wealth would not be affected. Furthermore despite alarmist claims, it is seen as temporary problem because with rise of automation it is expected that countries could focus more resources in the population growth. It is just that we aren't yet there. In many cases it is easier to "import" people for manual labor instead delegating high skilled/cost people for the task. But that need would drop over time.
2
Surprise. Poland don't fit most of those categories, despite being so called "American Dog". Also to be honest lot of that is made in bad faith. One of advantages of US is exactly that they do not force those relations. Just shared business and history exist.
1
Most Russians don't have toilets. You can't really fall from bottom and keeping decent standard of two larger cities is relatively easy. Also thing what people miss is that 2008 was not crisis of demand (the usual), but crisis of over-investment (anti-Keynes style crisis). With many speculative investor banks going down. Russia didn't have those tools on the first place, what is why they drag behind.
1
@seancoakley1087 People pick dolar because it was stable. I may only joke with them trading with Yuan or Rupees. Still better then Rubles, what basically is fictioial. BRICS is straight irrelevant to the West. Countries who refuse to make business almost always hit downward spiral. And not because US conspiracy. Currently China face with business moving to Vietnam and Indonesia. Not the other way around.
1
It is actually worst. BRICS was concept coined by Western economics, as countries what are in position to become future local economic powers. But that was assuming that they actually would do make proper reforms, instead assuming that prosperity would come and doing exact things what kill economic development (look Russia). From those arguably only China achieved some success. Furthermore whole concept was not a block opposing the West. Those countries never have anything common. In fact in some cases even hostilities (look India vs China) and in almost all cases success come from actual cooperation with the West (again China). Make-belief games in anti-West alliance was contradictory to whole idea.
1
Russia alone literally can't win WW3. Even if NATO disintegrate. China is another story, but even here success would be limited. China become developed state. Magic development ended. If China even survive financial collapse.
1