Comments by "TheRezro" (@TheRezro) on "MASSIVE Fire At Russian Weapons Facility In Omsk; Putin THREATENS War | Breaking News With Enforcer" video.

  1.  @Kualinar  It is even funnier. Russia denounced the result, as they offices were not informed it was them.
    2
  2. To be clear. We don't need. But we know our history and would not risk being abandoned for dumb reason. Again.
    1
  3.  @elduquecaradura1468  To be clear there is no evidence of intentional attack. There is only a evidence of Russian total incompetence. Most of those missiles fly there as result of malfunction.
    1
  4.  @russellhltn1396  There is in fact currently a debate how to behave in time of crisis. Also worth to remind that every major conflict involved irregular actions. Hybrid war is nothing new, it was banned because it typically lead to real war. For example how Russian sponsored terrorists killed France Ferdinand. Or how politics of USSR enabled Hitler to attack Poland. Yes, Russia was behind everything!
    1
  5.  @hongry-life  Yes. That is exactly what Russia did. Russian Army make moves immediately after signing Minsk.
    1
  6.  @hongry-life  If some NATO countries would attack Russia, then Moscow would be under occupation by now. Only country what attack is the Russia. Whose balls are now grind to dust in Ukraine. That is all.
    1
  7.  @origami83  Russia do not have 5k nukes. That is BS! Most of that arsenal remember Brezhniev and most likely is not operational. Especially without ability to use strategic bombers. Still, realistic arsenal is probably comparable to China and it would be huge pain if Russia decide to go Belka. Though Russia now try do everything to convince us that they lost nuclear capability completely. Rabit threats are sign of weakens.
    1
  8.  @alexnorth2452  If anything you should treat seriously countries what do not make direct threats. So US, UK or France. Because they know what is they strength. Smallest dogs bark loudest.
    1
  9.  @origami83  Yes. Legally sold them old stuff. Illegal lack of recognition by Russia is irrelevant. Russia itself recognized Ukraine and now show lack of basic ability to fallow international deals. It work only against them.
    1
  10.  @hongry-life  And? Despite what Russia illegally claim, Ukraine is a legal country. NATO has full right to sell them things. Russia has ZERO right to be on territory of Ukraine and war would not end until Russia leave.
    1
  11.  @alexnorth2452  I don't watch Russia Today. I don't have any knowledge about imaginary "threats". NATO threats are rare, because West usually deliver on those. Meanwhile "China for 158'th time warn Russia" as the old joke say. Putin's Red Lines, are a joke even in Russia. And yes. Imaginary West "is weak" nonsense. Meanwhile Russia stripped they border with Asia and Finland. Because Russia has "infinite" numbers of people. Also what bluff? West do not threat Russia with nukes. US even said that they conventionally crush Putin if he use the nukes. Simply because they can. Russia is literally a third world country, with economy smaller then Texas and population smaller then Mexico. Russian projections are exquisite as usual.
    1
  12. More Putin threats, the worst his situation is. Small dogs bark loudest.
    1