Comments by "William Innes" (@williaminnes6635) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

Of course, but not because of this law, but because his party gave up on their decisive issue - cost of living in the Canadian side of the rust belt - some months ago.
2
This law is being blown out of proportion. Canada has never had hard constitutional protections for speech rights. This is a weird situation, granted - the Canadian equivalent of a state government discriminated against Jews and Muslims by violating what would be termed, in America, their First Amendment rights, but because there are no hard protections for those rights in Canada, and because the majority in that equivalent of a state does not and never has supported speech rights in particular, there was nothing for the Canadian federal government to do when Muslims who voted for its equivalents of Congressmen - and in Canada it is like Congress ate the Senate and the Presidency, it's a REALLY fucked up system - except to say fine, if they can discriminate against you for practicing your religion, we will allow you to discriminate against them for criticizing your religion. Canada has just always been a very fucked up system.
2
@jeffersonclark7 I admire two countries above all others for speech rights, America, and Japan. and the guy who wrote the Japanese Constitution was American
2
@jeffersonclark7 of course, that happening to be another extremely technologically innovative country - especially product development, humanity period would be worse off without Japanese product development - is basically just another point of proof for what you were saying
2
It's fine. This law is only to target people who live in the province of Quebec who have angered the wrong mosque. Quebec has never believed in individual rights. Nothing has been lost.
2
no, he has it right, that's section 1 and the notwithstanding clause, the entire charter is more like guidelines Pierre Trudeau weakened individual rights tremendously when he removed the Unwritten Constitution and replaced it with what amounts to nothing.
1
oh this is just Canadian behaviour. This law will stay on the books indefinitely because this law is clearly intended to be used by Montreal mosques to punish their critics, because a different law, passed at the American equivalent of the state level, was due to clear a Canadian trial over whether it had correctly violated the First Amendment rights of Jews and Muslims.
1
Canada has been a very fucked up place for a very long time and by the miracle of being next to the biggest economy in the world with the second greatest emphasis on individual rights of any major country in the world has good odds of continuing to hobble along, most likely not as a country on the map or anything, but as a place with the same basic system which will remain in place. (If it stays a country on the map though, it will probably become like Russia.)
1
The best case scenario is that ALL of the provinces separate from one another. Ideally this is a controlled process over the course of several years over which functions are devolved and the Canada Act and then British North America Act are repealed in chunks.
1
algorithm
1
You mean to say that a conservaGiLF gave her granddaughter firearms for her birthday and Christmas? Wow what a fucking shock. Anyway.
1
@ironhell813 This law has plainly been passed to target critics of Islam resident in Quebec. The timing of it makes this obvious, as it was announced the day before the Quebec antiJew antiMuslim law cleared its court challenge that it had violated the individual speech rights of Jews and Muslims correctly. This meant Muslims in Montreal who had been a Liberal vote block would have to be told to go fuck themselves. It will affect nobody who keeps Islam out of their mouth, and nobody who does not live in Quebec. The reaction to the law is overblown.
1
I don't think so. This law if you look at the timing of when it was announced, the day before the court case that said the Quebec antiJew antiMuslim law violated their speech rights correctly came to its conclusion, was very clearly a bone thrown to Montreal Muslims who vote Liberal and were to be told to go fuck themselves on basic citizenship rights. The principle is, leave Quebec alone, no percentage in making them do things a certain way, no hope that they will ever contribute.
1
oh it'll be bad for the next 18 months however when they put up the carbon tax, they said they didn't care about cost of living in the Toronto suburbs, and that means they aren't interested in forming government
1
Autoplay glitched on during this segment while I was sleeping. Had an intense dream that a slightly corrupt small town alderman who looked a lot like Frank in the 1982 Brian De Palma Scarface was in the basement of his house on the phone with his lawyer who was grilling him about his crooked dealings with a school of which he was the principal in order to make a point to him that he did not want to end up answering those kinds of questions from a D. A. should he end up in a trial about the matter. Then I woke up and realized it had been Merrick Garland's voice as the alderman.
1
aw and a pony too!
1
It is overblown because this law has plainly been passed to go after critics of Islam resident in Quebec and those who have made enemies with certain mosques in Montreal. Note that this was announced the day before the Quebec antiJew antiMuslim law cleared its court challenge for having violated the individual speech rights of Jews and Muslims according to the correct procedure. Canada naturally does not have hard protections for speech rights. If you have a link to the speech index to which you are referring, I would like to see it, so that I can retain the organization that produced it as a pack of hired liars.
1
That stuff is going to wrap up as the political cover purchased by the kiddy slitters expires in country after country. The trans thing is just a little too evil for it not to affect people across the world and across cultures once they realize what is going on with it.
1
@jimjones994 He is leaving out a few things about this law in particular. Canada actually is a massively fucked up system, but it has been a massively fucked up system for a long time. This law is a proportionate response by the Canadian federal government against a Canadian equivalent of a state who had a law of theirs deliberately passed to violate what in America would be termed the First Amendment rights of Jews and Muslims clear a Canadian trial on whether the way it violated the First Amendment rights of Jews and Muslims was correct according to the fucked up mess that Canadian law has been for a long time. Because the majority in that Canadian equivalent of a state in particular are opposed to freedom of speech, and always have been, the only option was to make more speech illegal.
1
He is being slightly misleading by leaving out the context of the story. Canada is a LOT more fucked up than he is making it sound.
1