Comments by "William Innes" (@williaminnes6635) on "LegalEagle" channel.

  1. 4
  2. 2
  3. 1
  4.  @johnmoser3594  Interesting. I know the Danes in their employment law and union culture - they have a very high rate of labour organization - put a very high emphasis on working conditions and wages, but don't protect job security longer than the duration of any one contract. I wasn't aware the Swedes and Finns did it somewhat that way. The big issue with addressing income stability through centralized programs is that it comes out of the pockets of other employees, due to wage stickiness from inflation through money printing, or through taxation, which would most likely result in fairly humble people giving three fifths of their paycheque to the government, as do long term residents in much of Europe. Layman and foreigner opinion, America would benefit immensely from a federal subsidy to states implementing a taper to welfare, as well as a taper to Medicaid, to eliminate the welfare cliff, but it would take a triumvirate of human bulldozers leading the House, Senate, and Executive to wage the legislative jihad it would require to clear up the real fiscal space to avoid the two outcomes which would negate the desired effect. Look at how hard and bold the entrenched corporate interests are willing to fight to preserve the Affordable Care Act, for instance. They've gone right for the most toxic social externalities caused by the least honest and most parasitic elements of the pharmaceutical and psychological industrial complexes, and attempted to depict support for these outcomes as a marker of compassion. They know it's bad for people. They also know it makes them a mountain of cash.
    1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1