Comments by "bas kir" (@vinsin328) on "NDTV" channel.

  1. He was depressed when BJP won 2019 election. He even went to blame media for Modi victory.
    56
  2.  @anuradhamandal8777  Evidence for facts?
    13
  3.  @rohandybala2152  You are not answering my question just repeating same thing. ok so no facts. How many moved to Pakistan - any data? Any facts on to whom Modi asked to move to Pakistan - can you name a person - I will file a case - but you will no do it. How expression a view is attack on India's democracy, diversity and unity? Can you explain? Nope you will not do it. If you are shamed then why not change your country - nope that also you wont do it. What fascism are you talking about? What do you want to counter? By your logic Nehru was fascist, is that you also agree?
    10
  4.  @rohandybala2152  ok so no facts. How many moved to Pakistan - any data? Any facts on to whom Modi asked to move to Pakistan - can you name a person - I will a case - but you will no do it. How expression a view is attack on India's democracy, diversity and unity? Can you explain? Nope you will not do it. If you are shamed then why not change your country - nope that also you wont do it.
    7
  5. Not Sanatan Dharma, but Brahmavadi
    5
  6. Hamid gul says they were made by ISI, financed by Saudi and equipped by both pakistan and US.
    5
  7. ***** You are saying that Muslims of India who are dying for no reason. If they are dying then how come there population has increased percentage wise. Indian Muslims voted and created Pakistan and some want another partition also.
    4
  8. noor37130 Indian muslims were given 25% of land so that they can stay in pakistan not in india. Most of the muslins didn't participate in independence struggle. They were fighting with Hindus for pakistani. According to united Nation only those muslims who voluntary came to india from pakistan and participated in indian freedom movement can stay in india. In other words only 1.5% of total population. Even Karachi was made by Hindu Sindhi people.
    4
  9. So you are saying jihad is wrong and Muhammed was wrong.
    3
  10. Crime is a state subject, not a central state subject. Also, BJP is not the ruling party in Jharkhand.
    3
  11. Because that would be against the Panchsheel agreement.
    3
  12.  @southkoreausasmaster8805  Before Britishers it was mostly Marathas, then Sikhs, Wodhaiyers and then 3 Nawabs.
    2
  13. noor37130 that is not a radical argument that is part of history. And I only pissed off that I born as jain but muslims opposed for recognition of jain. This year they are officially recognized. Now I am atheist and muslims again fighting it not to be recognized. I am not the one who is going to decide it has to be decided by indian muslims themselves what they want. It is also depends on which law or agreement you look at. By international laws close to 1.25%, patitio act 1% +2% will decide later. By nehru liaquant pact 4.5 % currently. Yes you are right about Kerala and indian pm said that Kerala is next kashmir and Kerala up west bengal and Bihar may not be part of india union after 2040-2050. Even Kerala cm said the same thing 2 years back. But with growing population and less resource india is heading for a civil war. Hope I am wrong and things work out fine. Anyway you and your family did the best thing by running away from this mess created by nehru and congress. If you have time then read Columbia university article on indian muslims 1970. It will explain you exactly the current situation of india. 
    2
  14.  @prakashkapoor2289  Krishna never had 16000 wives. Be atleast logical.
    2
  15. ​ @southkoreausasmaster8805  Caste system was introduced by Britishers, not sure what are you talking about?
    2
  16. What consequences? Mankind is not worried about stupid Brahmavad. Brahmavadi saying since time immemorial, nothing has happened.
    2
  17. We need to avoid another partition and need to filter Islamic terrorists.
    2
  18. They decided to vote and create Pakistan. Who ask them to stay?
    2
  19. It is already for partitioned.
    2
  20. Just like Mangal Pandey.
    2
  21. That was in the Agra submit. Now times are different. CPEC passes through POK, so Pakistan will never accept such a position. There would still be a lot of issues related to citizenship etc. It was easier to resolve issues just after Independence/partition or before Nehru's death. I think this issue will continue for many decades to many centuries. Certainly this is an ego issue and expect to get things even bloodier.
    1
  22. He is confused between the size of the economy and per capita income. Commodities prices are not decided by the government. He is also incorrect - Nehru didn't declare India to be a secular country or wanted to implement equal rights. The Constitution of India was made by Ambedkar, not Nehru. It is an Abhramic idea to talk about slavery in the Indian context. The system was made by Britishers. Parivad is bad, period. His idea that Hindus and Sikhs should be okay if they get killed or raped by Muslims - the cornerstone of Gandhivad, will not sell in this day and age. Neither I support Godse nor Gandhivad.
    1
  23. noor37130 dude that is unresolved issue of indian subcontinent. After independence indian muslims have no right to stay in india by m a khan. Similarly for pakistani hindus. No international laws condemn the genocide of hindus in Bangladesh and ongoing in pakistan because they don't have any rights. Similarly for kashmiri muslims and gujarat riots. 89.5 % of indian muslims voted for pakistan and refused to move after creation. So it is like indian muslims created a land for themselves and then acting selfish now. Had pakistan performed better economically most of them moved to pakistan. Nehru closed the border to use Muslims as vote bank. Most of the indian muslims acted against india and refused population control, uniform civil code, banned so many religion which never happened in india history, no animal rights, no religious clothing rule, no religious building rule, no women rights, against child rights. Are there any rules that indian muslims follow? Indian muslims have succeded in destroying pakistan, Bangladesh and india also. You have zero contribution in solvinv india population and education issue. Also I was stating international laws. Partition act allows only 1-3 percentage of indian population to be muslims. You can stay here for riots or partition what more can I say?
    1
  24. It was never a free country. After that Nehru declared that a disputed territory and filed a case in UN for making J&K as an Independent country. Nehru never accepted in UN that the king joined India. He said multiple time that Indian Army is the occupier.
    1
  25. noor37130 no I am not a lawyer. Interested in indian subcontinent history. Tried to read world history but gave up. But yes I do know thing that probably known to say 0.1% of indian but more and more are getting to know though internet. It has created huge problem for indian muslims now. I am staying will three kerala muslims and they all want to stay in india but don't want to follow indian laws. In order to show fake patriotism they will bad mouth pakistani and say kashmir is part of india. Basically I was lucky to study history under an American teacher. I didn't like it when she told so many issues created by nehru that most of us hated her. But things are turning ugly now, as predicted that might happen by Columbia university. You can also find a lot of unhrc petition by indian muslims to safe guard from secularism and Hindu gods. Most of the time they don't reply or ask for follow law of the land. Secretly all human rights officer say why Indian muslims don't move to pakistan if they have issues with hindus. What better offer any country can offer? So don't be surprised if hear a lot if riots in india in future or movement of many muslims to pakistan. I will accept any verdict as that of god or law of nature. It is the indian muslims who has to understand that riots will not take them far away, follow law of the land and the agreement of partition signed by muslim league and congress. My big concern is that If indian muslims act funny then whole world muslims community will be sidelined, segregated and neglected. Not good times for subcontinent muslims and muslims at large.
    1
  26. ***** Then how come Indian Muslim population has increased. Why Indian Muslims support pakistan then? Even if I consider you are right then why Indian Muslims dont move to Pakistan? If Hindus from Pakistan cant allow to move to Pakistan then where should they go? Atleast they will not be force converted ot raped for bring non-muslims.
    1
  27. ***** I agree, I should have used the word many. I also agree with you that Muslims from Maharashtra support least to Pakistan. Till now I have met only Muslims from Maharastra special Mumbai who doesnt support Pakistan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azad_Maidan_riots I have seen biggest support among Hyderabadi, Tamil, Kerala, Kashmir, UP Muslims. No some still keep moving. On an average you can find 1-2 articles on Pakistani newspaper. http://tribune.com.pk/story/748745/am-i-pakistani-or-am-i-indian/ I am staying with four Muslims from Kerala and all of them want India to an Islamic State but at the same time three of them dont like Pakistan, not sure why but only one of them want to move to Pakistan.
    1
  28. Pakistan was not weak at the time of Independence.
    1
  29. And the mid day meals are nothing but carbs.
    1
  30. Which temple they have built? Please provide evidence, I will file a case.
    1
  31. RSS doesn't care about cows. But you are correct that the current BJP is highly backward. Ahimsa is not associated with Hinduism.
    1
  32. Kashmiris Muslims never wanted to join India.
    1
  33. Even though people will agree but then what we should do with the Panchsheel agreement.
    1
  34. When were they legal anyway
    1
  35. State are secular but not people. So Hindus cannot be secular. If you want ask if India is secular then answer is NO - Muslim appeasement is not secularism. You yourself has answer the question that Muslims are having special rights.
    1
  36.  @siddhidhuri3107  Not true. There is nothing called Sati Law in Hinduism.
    1
  37. So did you get it or not?
    1
  38. Both are same.
    1
  39. ok, but Pakistan is already created.
    1
  40.  @muhammadnawazuddin5796  Are you not circumcised?
    1
  41.  @muhammadnawazuddin5796  Is circumcision segregating the people or not?
    1
  42.  @muhammadnawazuddin5796  You didnt answer my question, why? Are you a Kafir?
    1
  43.  @muhammadnawazuddin5796  So you accept circumcision done to segregate people. Eating only halal meat is that segregation?
    1
  44.  @muhammadnawazuddin5796  Evidence for your claims? You didnt answer these questions : So you accept circumcision done to segregate people. Eating only halal meat is that segregation?
    1
  45. So why country cannot be divided again? When you want Indian to be divided? NRC is part of Indian constitution since 1987. CAA is part of Partition Act and Liaquat Nehru pact.
    1
  46. That is against CAA.
    1
  47. People voted for that. It is democracy.
    1
  48. Having an ecosystem like that can take 5-10 years (to have a version of Andriod and smartphones). A complete one may take 20-25 years (with search engine and map etc.)
    1
  49. Except one no one was speaking in English and how do you know they know Hindi?
    1
  50. Hindi is not the national language.
    1