Comments by "bas kir" (@vinsin328) on "“Bhut Hi Galat Kam Kiya” Locals slam at Ayodhya voters over BJP’s loss in Lok Sabha Elections 2024" video.

  1. What price? Will they get to eat or not? Will they get freedom from Brahmavad or not?
    5
  2. Nope, they voted against Brahmavad. No people would be free to practise Hinduism in Ayodha just like Lord Ram
    5
  3. for what? what non-sense
    5
  4. Nope, they knew that Hindus did not support Brahmavad.
    3
  5. do not worry Brahmavadi and Jains didn't betray the BJP
    3
  6. That is a myth. It is not about the character, it is about food and Brahmavad.
    2
  7. for what?
    2
  8. What development? Is non-veg and beef allowed in Ayodhya? You are a typical Brahmavadi and Baniya.
    2
  9. They are not smoking anything, they just do not support Brahmavad.
    2
  10. What about Brahmavadi?
    2
  11. true people were also forced to accept Brahmavad and Vegetarianism.
    1
  12. They need food. The majority of Beef gets exported.
    1
  13. nope, they are against Brahmavad
    1
  14. Yes, food is more important.
    1
  15. So who forced vegetarianism Ayodhya? Who started it?
    1
  16. Struggle for what? To support Brahmavad finally.
    1
  17. Stealing poor people's food, supporting Brahmavad, forcing vegetarian, and destroying people's health is not development.
    1
  18. Why do Hindus vote for the Brahmavadi Supporter BJP Modi?
    1
  19. No one asked Sita to walk over the fire. Read Valmiki Ramayana. Do not spread false information about Hinduism.
    1
  20. Yep, that is the reason some Indians were against British rule.
    1
  21. Why do Hindus support Brahmavad? Akh thuuuuuu
    1
  22. Why? nope, except Brahmavad no one will do that.
    1
  23. Brahmins do not believe in caste but in Brahmavad.
    1
  24. Jai Sita Ram. Be a Hindu, not a Brahmavadi. Otherwise, say Jai Sita Vishu.
    1
  25. Lots of reasons, Modi wants to support and force Brahmavad and Vegetarianism. Yogi wants to force Brahmavad and Cow over Hinduism. Both support food terrorism and Brahmavad and that is the problem. Lord Ram was a pure non-vegetarian, and Lord Sita was a butcher. They also give more importance to Ramcharitya Manas over Valmiki Ramayana. The election was about food terrorism and Brahmavad.
    1
  26. Why?
    1
  27. And they do not care about Baniyas and Brahmavadi like you. If I give you money and you cannot eat, will you be happy?
    1
  28. They voted against Brahmavad and Shri Ram as they support Hinduism and Sita Ram. You have money but cannot eat, what is the use of that money? Don't be Baniya.
    1
  29. Rama was not forcing vegetarianism and Brahmavad on Ayodhya. You are comparing myth with reality. You are xenophobic
    1
  30. There are many organisations on Brahmavad but none for Hindus.
    1
  31. it would not have impacted much. That is the problem of Indians that even now we cannot have at least 75% of voters voting.
    1
  32. It is still colonized by Brahmavadi
    1
  33. And why?
    1
  34. That is against secularism and nation-states.
    1
  35. Nope, they choose Hinduism over development. People do not have enough to eat healthily and people are force to follow Brahmavad.
    1
  36. People need food first.
    1
  37. Jai Sita Ram. Supporting Brahmavad - you should not be proud.
    1
  38. Sita Mata was a butcher which is banned in Ayodhya so they reacted.
    1
  39. For what? Supporting Hinduism is being a traitor.
    1
  40. Brahmavad cannot be a culture.
    1
  41. nope, Hindism over Brahmavad.
    1
  42. Nope, because other religions do not have Brahmavad. Why is non-veg and beef banned in Ayodhya? It is a disservice to Brahmavad, not Hindus.
    1
  43. Divided by Brahmavad, not caste or food terrorism.
    1