Comments by "bas kir" (@vinsin328) on "ThePrint" channel.

  1. There is no Praduman in Harivansha. And no Badrinath.
    5
  2. The last line supports the two-nation theory.
    5
  3. It was always like that. All leftist party around the world has always been sympathetic to Muslims and their cause. They are funded by China. Muslims have always been used to partition country around thr world. It is a win-win situation left-Muslim unity.
    4
  4. What do you meant by that?
    4
  5. Question is why India rejected the borders given by Britishers when they left. Why Nehru wanted to renegotiate border with China and Pakistan on J&K? Britishers left India with both Tibet and J&K. Nehru declared J&K as an international disputed territory and gifted Tibet in 1950 and signed agreement in 1954. Nehru even agreed to give Arunachal Pradesh to China.
    4
  6. It is the other way around.
    4
  7. Secularism (no secular laws are implemented in India still and have a lot of anti-secular permanent articles), Liberalism (not liberal enough), Muslim appeasement (temporarily), and religious appeasement through various articles.
    4
  8. Zakat is not a tax. Jizya is a protection or humiliation tax. Taxes are equal for all citizens, they don't defer based on religion. Jizya was used to force convert Kafirs to Muslims or as a pretext to spread slavery.
    4
  9. Same is in north India. How many people will go for funeral of beef eating Hindus Ravindranath Tagore, Aurbindo or those who were against Brahmavad. You will find far more people who are against Hindus and supported of Brahmavad.
    4
  10. Yes. But who is the enemy? It lies within, that is Brahmavad.
    4
  11. Because he wants another partition of India.
    4
  12. So now he doesnt believe in secularism. Pluralism and Islamism is same. He is openly supporting Muslim appeasement without any remorse.
    4
  13. And why should they? Do Brahmins and Brahmavadi look at Hindus with respect? Do Brahmavadi, Jains look at Human beings with respect? Nope, the only respect is for cows.
    4
  14. It is not Hindu nationalism but Brahmavadi nationalism.
    4
  15.  @muazzamshaikh2049  Nope, he claimed to be a savior of Brahmavads.
    4
  16. True, but the reservation is given because of an incomplete partition.
    4
  17. It is also done on force by supreme court. No nation allows illegal migrants. Nowhere. There are people who want to challenge supreme court order in supreme court.
    4
  18. Hinduism is a dharma not a religion. Jai Sita Ram.
    4
  19. That was instrument of accession. Kashmiri Muslims always sympathise with Pakistan. Which human rights are you talking about? Since when internet has become human rights issue?
    4
  20. Why?
    4
  21. Yes that is required to know if Brahmavadi discriminated or not.
    4
  22. And what about Brahmavad.
    4
  23. how that can be defended? example
    4
  24. Also they are opposing their own constitution. CAA - formulated by Kapil Sibal. NRC - Rajiv Gandhi.
    4
  25. He is asking do Indian Muslims have right to have another partition or not? If not then TNT is right.
    4
  26. Why?
    4
  27.  @jumdas1049  Caste was introduced by Britishers. Islamic caste system is most rigid. Not sure about your logic.
    4
  28. Pride in what? Caste system, women discrimination, Brahmavad, food terrorism, etc.
    4
  29. How can that be done? What has that to do with the topic of discussion?
    4
  30. Then why India signed Panchsheel agreement.
    4
  31.  @VictorValdes-li6pj How many Muslims follow secular laws in India? Maulana Azad wanted Muslims to move to Pakistan or convert.
    4
  32. You are 100% right.
    4
  33. To become superpower you need to have J&K and Tibet, so how are you going to get it back? Nehru never wanted India to be even regional power. I am confused. Both Nehru and Patel had completely different idea about India.
    4
  34. Then why India signed Panchsheel Agreement? Aksai chin is a disputed territory. If Aksai Chin is Indian territory then why India doesnt control it.
    4
  35. Not true. It was done by Brahmavadi. Who is asking Hindus to worship cows and stop eating beef?
    3
  36. Hindus voted against BJP support for Brahmavad.
    3
  37. That is Muslim appeasement, not secularism. China is also an example of secularism. North Indian states are examples of Brahmavad, not secularism.
    3
  38. Panchsheel Agreement.
    3
  39. Nope, you have never lost in the past and not much in the present. The future? Who knows?
    3
  40. Yes, oppostion is against food terrorism and Brahmavad and ultimately support women rights.
    3
  41. Who won the 1947-48 Kashmir war then? Who won the Congo crisis war? Al-wadiah war? Soviet-Afghan war? etc. Not sure what is your point of lying?
    3
  42. Nope, it is not mentioned.
    3
  43. Nope, for that Hindus have to eat beef and you have to destroy Brahmavad. That will take atleast 100+ yrs. Also it is a north Indian issue.
    3
  44. @NikhilPodlejski Please provide evidence that cow is sacred in Hinduism. Then Hinduism is not dharma.
    3
  45. Brahmavad will not allow. Cows are in gausala and 50 crores Indians are stunted.
    3
  46.  @james432ful  Nope It is not mentioned in RigVeda or wiki. Why are you lying? Typical Brahmavadi.
    3
  47. Why? Dharma will always rise. The main problem is rise of Brahmavad not Muslim population.
    3
  48. Congress pampered Brahmavadi not Muslims. Congess is not responsible if hindus converted to Brahmavadi and stopped having beef. West issue is different compared to Indians. Indians issue is Brahmavad and low meat consumption and for which no one is responsible expect they themselves. Food terrorism is the issue of Hindus.
    3
  49. true but no law supports them.
    3
  50. Not true. Jains and Parsis numbers have decreased in India.
    3