Comments by "André" (@Andre-qo5ek) on "National Geographic" channel.

  1. at this point, transparency will not convince anyone. people brains are too fried to take in information anymore.
    2
  2. "the report established that UFOs are real physical phenomenon it also stated that they were not American Technology and there was no evidence that they were either Russian or Chinese so we know that what we don't know is what caused this phenomena with the coming out of this report it's opened up a door because the report in effect is inconclusive" lets break this down on face value: UnIdentified Flying Oblects are "real" ... um .. sure.. ANYTHING that a person can not identify, that is in the sky, is a UFO... that is just THE DEFINITION. it does not speak about what the object is. "not American Technology" ok, this is jsut a stament of fact "there was no evidence that they were either Russian or Chinese " this is based on EVIDENCE. so it COULD be russian and chinese tech... but there was no EVIDENCE in the posession of the americans they sould point to to prove it was. correct... inconclusive is not a bad thing. ---- why are we playing this up as ... since we dont know; ALIENS!!!! this is LITERALLY god of the gaps. can we stop being insane... please.... ESPECIALLY you @NationalGeographic -- i want EVIDENCE , not speculation
    1