Comments by "BurritosLS" (@burritosls) on "Ukraine-Russia war: Two killed after explosion on Crimea's Kerch Bridge" video.

Because this is the most ordinary passenger bridge. Tourists use it most of all.
4
@emma9348 Is the civil war that began in 2014 considered the norm? OK.
3
@emma9348 All of this would not have happened if the United States had not supported the military coup in Ukraine in 2014, after which the Civil War began. Let's not forget about it.
2
@astamano1274 🤡🤡🤡 no comments, lol
2
@nowakevelyne223 Crimea - is Russia, lol. It's almost 10 years🙄
2
@eleventy-seven a lot of Russians, Crimea - it's a tourist city. What is so funny in that?
2
As long as it takes. If Putin is replaced, then his receiver will continue the work.
1
there is no doubt that the United States helped Ukraine in the terrorist attack. This is not the first time in history when the United States uses terrorists for its own purposes, coordinating their actions.
1
@emma9348 🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡 OK
1
No. It is almost not used to supply the army anymore, it's just inconvenient. All reports about this are propaganda. The bridge is a civilian object. All that Ukraine has achieved with this terrorist attack is killing two people and damaging part of the bridge.
1
@kerdart351 Yes, it was. But 95% of the inhabitants of Crimea are Russians. They spoke out in favor of being part of Russia. Does their opinion mean nothing? It turns out that Ukraine will have to kill them all to return Crimea? Such a plan? No negativity, just a simple question.
1
@loupgarou-dj3tm Why not? London Bridge is legal target for Russia, because UK is Ukrainian ally. And Golden Bridge in USA too😉
1
@avigator Crimea is not a war zone, troll. It is a far away from war zone.
1
Russia struck at the place where the terrorist attack on the Crimean Bridge was being prepared. The shipbuilding plant in Odessa was struck. Great job!💪 ru ru ru ru ru
1