Comments by "Christina" (@MargaritaMagdalena) on "How Russia and China are winning the vaccine diplomacy race | DW News" video.

6:43 "and it's not just Africa. The Russian vaccine is going global". Because Africa is not global right? Nice Western chauvinism there.
6
If you don't want the Russian vaccine don't take it
3
Give me some examples of bias in this vid
2
@manufer2 Did you just like your own comment? Really lame dude.
2
@arupsarker79 The British peer-reviewed medical journal "The Lancet" says that the Russi@n vaccine is safe and effective
1
@arupsarker79 Now that we know that the Russi@n vaccine is safe and effective, are you happy?
1
@manufer2 🤣🤣🤣 I don't think this vid is like a commercial at all tho. For example at 2:33 it says that the Sputnik vaccine gave Kremlin "a rare chance to improve its image. No longer a c0rrupt regime suppressing opposition but a re-emerging power with groundbreaking scientists" That's not what a commercial would sound like.
1
@manufer2 4:10 "for Beijing, vaccine diplomacy offers a way to make the world forget how little transparency it showed when the pandemic started. The gov't took a year to allow international experts into China to investigate the origins of the coronavirus." 4:31 "China is a double edged sword. It can be very helpful but it's very self-interested" 4:56 "the worst case scenario is China is bartering life saving vaccines against something that will harm countries in the future. For example to put countries into debt, extract resources or extract favors, or even extract geopolitical advantage" Does this sound like advertising to you?
1
@manufer2 Calling countries "a c0rrupt regime", "self-interested" and "maybe harming other countries" is excusing wrongdoing?
1
@manufer2 Also, how do the comments make this video biased?
1
@manufer2 "This video is biased. Just look at the comments." 🤔😐😈💩🙈🙈🙈
1