Comments by "K X" (@kx7500) on "PayPal Made a Big Mistake..." video.

well, the individual people working for it shouldn't be forced to generally either. Unless it's a life or death situation and you've agreed to exactly that job beforehand. Cops should be saving people when able to. (which they don't.)
4
@manofcultura So if I want to make a space where you're not allowed to be racist I shouldn't allowed to make my space like that? delusional and ridiculous lol
3
@CuZtuga Yes they did, because that's what jules is. Can tell by his content and the way he speaks to people lol. So many right wing bots in the comments lately.
3
JO JO well said.
3
@gorotheelite nah go to a right wing pundit channel. Dedicated seething in the comments 24/7
2
@gageemmons4124 uh... they both are? thanks for saying you don't think domestic terrorism is a problem tho lol
2
@Jules Lol if you're trying to argue that a literal nzi terrorist being ousted from society is bad then I simply disagree. These people act to make everyone suffer and die.
2
@Jules cry harder
2
@aerfwefd7334 that's blatantly not true and anyone saying that is outing themselves as a fash sympathizer lol
2
@gageemmons4124 alrighty
1
with how crazy radical and toxic you have to be to get banned by social media in reality and how easy it is to bypass them, the only people you're defending are people like nzis, and in that case, cry about it honestly lol.
1
@johannderjager4146 anyone that thinks capitalist institutions have a left bias is delusional.
1
@TheEnmineer This will sound arrogant, but it's actually not THAT hard. The problem is even when everyone agrees that something like freedom is good, most people don't actually have power, so it can't be implemented. We need a totally decentralized bottom up consensus based system to maximize everyone's best interests
1
@TheEnmineer Thanks for the response. 1. Of course, you start with the most fundamental truths when making rules and then splinter it off into more and more practical specificity as far as you can. Until the rules get into the individual communities, families, and individuals etc. maximizing both collective and individual rights. 2. Ancient greece was not whatsoever an example of pure democracy, nor is "mob rule" an example of pure democracy. I don't advocate for majoritarianism. I advocate for a system where consensus is the ultimate ideal, and compromises are made to have as many people agree with the outcome as possible. Here's an example: there's a factory with 30 white workers and 10 black workers. most if not all the white workers happen to be racist and want the black workers to be paid less. The black workers dissent and are of course in the minority. Now, the proposal must be changed to either have everyone agree on it (doesn't mean it's ideal for everyone, just that it's the best choice that makes everyone the most happy.), or if not possible, to expand the majority vote as much as possible through compromise and discussion. This way an oppressed minority can defend itself from a wrong majority, minimizing "mob rule" while also maximizing the will of everyone. This system you'll see is actually embraced by genuine anarchists out there as it maximizes freedom for everyone and abolishes non consentual hierarchies as much as any system could. With however flawed human beings are, no matter what, that can never justify putting less of those humans in charge with more power concentrated amongst them. That is always less efficient without the genuine and continuous consent of those they affect. Which we do not have now, since politicians are bought and sold mostly by corporate power even in liberal "democracies" I hope this makes sense:)
1
@pauls5745 Most ppl agree with this. However what do you think of the fact that some governments such as russia literally pay thousands of people in "troll farms" where people make account after account to swarm every comment section with misinformation? the problem is that falls under freedom of speech too, but we know why they're doing this. To basically destabilize western governments. So you can either let them drown every comment section or not let them win and ban this garbage from the platform, and effectively allowing more people to have freedom of speech without having to deal with fascists spamming them every time. If you don't think my example is real, look it up for yourself, it's well documented and there are whistleblowers from the industry. They don't get paid much but they do, often they get paid more depending on how much engagement their toxic comments and posts get too. It's disgusting.
1