Comments by "Earnest Equivocation" (@earnestequivocation6250) on "Starmer hits out at Tory MPs after ‘law-breaking’ Johnson survives no-confidence vote" video.

Dishonest. The issue is fundamental. Starmer alleged. infraction was utterly insignificant.
3
What’s your thoughts on what he ought to be doing? Any specific /tangible?
3
The opportunist populist Brexitory ERG coalition didn’t. It just conned you on controlling immigration, supporting British employees, protecting our NHS , and decreasing red tape.
1
Tory trolls are replaying the Daily Mail’s 7 day front page ‘Headline’ : Starmer had a beer with curry at a working constituency meeting, for all they’re worth. They’re despicable degenerates.
1
What is the current form of Labour? What should it be doing?
1
What do you mean ‘the people’? Who appointed you to decide what ‘the people’ want? These dishonest clowns are dragging our country down into the gutter!
1
@Jack-uy7ie You're suggesting he has the charisma of Sir John Redwood? What do any of the political parties stand for ? Starmer has been pilloried incessantly by the redoubtable Right Wing Media machine for 'doing Britain down' whenever he's highlighted the glaring errors of the Clown at No 10 and his puppets.....he's rightly dug his heels in over Johnson's despicable display of contempt for the electorate over what Pius Ponce-Smug sneeringly called 'fluff'. Starmer has spoken very well on a number of occasions and not long after this devastating takedown of Bunter : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWzLZ-UZ4AY Johnson decided to trawl the gutter with his baseless Savile slur whilst Mogg was caught sneering on camera. No opposition you say? Also Starmer has led the way with windfall tax after Tory feeble Tory attempts to claim it couldn't be done , the dithering Plank at No 10 was forced to act. And corruption Jack....really? The BrexitSpivs are corrupt to the core as The Friends of Owen Patterson demonstrated. Starmer also proposed implementing the Nrexit Benefit that Johnson promised he'd honour.....when he actually meant dishonour. Feeble superficial claptrap Jack - Truth is you wouldn't recognise the truth if it slapped you in the face.
1
@Jack-uy7ie To be clear I don't give a toss who or what you imagine you support.Your incohesive rambling is the antithesis of clear. I dismantled your meandering babble with evidence of what has actually happened - so yeah, you got bored. It's you who's fixated with personality or don't you actually understand what you've disgorged? You're a silly boy who can't concentrate. Go and learn some stuff.
1