Comments by "Diana Pennepacker" (@dianapennepacker6854) on "" video.

@FireCrack The fact it landed while really important parts were disintegrating was an amazing feat of software, and hardware (joints) engineering. That must have been terrible for the flight system to handle. The fact so much disintegrated, and read in comments hardware failures is concerning. I don't buy that it was planned. They've got a lot to go. It was insane it had a live feed.
5
@angrydoggy9170 It is supposed to be cheaper due to economy of scale to use Starship. Well that is what Musk says. Will it? Truthfully I don't know rocket economics. Will it be turning around every day? Ha, not if half of it disintergrated on the way back down. That feat I think is far away. Also people make satellites to fit rockets. A lot of satellites will be able to take advantage of the sheer size which will be awesome as I heard some ideas require a rocket with a bigger diameter which it has. Let us hope after they finish this design they work on an even bigger rocket or work on bigger versions of the Raptors. Tesla and Space X likes robots, but they should invest in 3d printing too! 3D printing can allow so much that I'm surprised they aren't going heavy into it. Supposed to make the parts dirt cheap, but designing them isn't. I suspect due to 3d printing limitations have to be kept in mind.
5