Comments by "Aachoo Crony" (@aachoocrony5754) on "Whatifalthist"
channel.
-
8
-
4
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The matriarch is reactionary while the patriarch plays the geopolitical game. The women bit the fruit and lured the man. That's communism taking over a country in a nutshell. Someone suggested to the women that something was lacking in Eden.
In a man-made construct, due to failures, it's much easier to subvert and destabilize a State.
Communism is a geopolitical tool, a weapon. It's exported by the Anglo-American conglomerate of the Liberal West. It was the ideological catalyst for civil wars across Europe between extreme leftism factions notably between the Communists and Fascists. Yes, fascists for practical purposes are far left. They are 2 peas in a pod, 2 species of similar fish in a fish tank who are the first to target each other.
(The real catalyst was financial which gave rise to extreme leftist authoritarians. The Financial crisis started w the Federal Reserve in the 20th century but really which was the culmination of another war fought for throughout 19th century United States.)
The Fascists in Germany and Bolsheviks in Russia prevailed by design to fuel the cycles of perpetual conflict and reconstruction.
WW1 was not 'the war to end all wars' but the exact opppsite. It was the final face off between European colonial empires yes, and the beginning of the new stage of empiricism from the victors.
In this case, Anglo-America/Arabs versus Germany/Turkish Empire. Although Europe was the main battleground the principal objective was the Middle East and it's oil. Whoever controlled it controlled the most of the world and the 20th century. All wars can be traced back to ww1. The Middle East was remapped with the intent of destabilizing the region for future purposes. So we have whole ethnicities relocated, extremist minorities put in governments, religious ethnic diversity juxtaposed next to each other, whole new countries formed.
WW2 further consolidated the successes of ww1 and weakened Russia who takes the most credit for defeating the Nazi war machine. One of the defiant nations to the Western Liberal Empire. After the fall of the Iron curtain and the Soviet Union, the Liberal West never stopped targeting Russia.
It was never about ideology but geopolitics and necessity. A losing State will protect itself through authoritarian measures. The winning State will use amorphous terms such as 'Liberalism' as propaganda against the losing State. It will hide its authoritarianism through themes such as diversity and inclusion, multicolours, which also wash it's past and present empirical history.
No ideology is absolute in theory or practice. If you believe so, you're weakening your country. Fat communist leaders are obviously capitalists. The liberalism West is capitalist but also socialist. Underneath that is corporate fascism. Fascist until now but could easily turn to a more extreme version of socialism- communism or more extreme yet with modern technology.
Until now, it was only the 4 epicenters of the Liberal West that haven't fallen prey to extreme direct leftist authoritarianism: Switzerland, Vatican, Britain, USA. They immunized themselves through small doses, even embracing and sheltering many of their ideological thought leaders. The epicenter of communism is/was New York City and London is not far behind. They institutionalised their ideology in universities to 'keep their enemies closer', and to weaponize them against geopolitical competitors. No wonder the governments of the EU is filled with their trainees in their rank/file. The same Social Democrats who represent a majority of well-intentioned people(aren't we all?) allied w the Greens. This echoes history in Germany and Russia.
The feudal overlords of the Anglo-Americans is the Catholic Church. Their historical enemy is the Orthodox Church. The Venetians of old have kept their wealth over the millennia and control the Vatican. They ordered the sacking of Constantinople in the 4th Crusade from which the Byzantine Empire never recovered, descending into it's inevitable decline 2 centuries later. It was the Venetians who 'liberalized' the AngloSaxons, establishing their first banks there in the 1400's. They helped the Dutch and the Brits to establish the East India company as well. The Medici's were among the first to find useful agents in the persecuted Jews. The Rothschild's are the bookkeepers to the Vatican. Ideologically the Turks are another enemy of the Venetians.
The US took over the British Empire after ww2. Perhaps FDR was put to sleep to assuage the demoted Brits.
The question remains of what the power dynamic is in the Liber West between the US and the Vatican.
As it is, ww3 doesn't seem to be going as planned. East Europe is weaponized against Russia and East Asia against China. Without ww3, the Liberal West will take 2nd place, perhaps splinter. With ww3 the whole world is destroyed economically. It's ironic that nuclear deterrent was discovered at the end of WW2 when Germany was already known to be defeated years earlier. It would deter against a 3rd world war. In fact, modern conventional weapons also deter direct conflict. Only proxy wars.
*When you see a State being increasingly authoritarian it is either out of foreign subversion, or out of the State's need to preserve itself. In other words it is losing. Is it good or bad? Losing in the Liberal West won't be as harsh as past historical precedents. 'And from the ashes' will rise something better or worse...but still very strong.
1
-
1