Comments by "Aachoo Crony" (@aachoocrony5754) on "Sandboxx" channel.

  1.  @redrolo149  China this China that. They have more engineers than we do, they have more patents than we do, their students are preferring to go to their own universities. They rip off from the Russians, officially. Wonder why the 22 and 35 look so much like the 57 and not from the Chinese planes? Because we rip from the Russians too, unofficially. Our stealth is based on Russian stealth research from the 50's and 60's. We also straight up ripped from the design of their Yak, officially, after we bought the design from them.
    9
  2. When it comes to military propaganda you can always tell which side is closer to the truth. Go with the pandering voice.
    6
  3.  @cruise_missile8387  The F-35 is trash, not worth half the price. In South Korea alone, it's known as the F-234 and that was a while ago. Stealth is overhyped too. The Russians and Chinese will lock onto them easily. Their planes also have superior range btw. But I guess you want to hype the F-35 because you pay for all of it. Do you know why they won't be sending F-35's to Ukraine? because it would pop your bubble. It would be embarrassing.
    5
  4.  @christopherchartier3017  yeah makes sense. If I could give my 2 cents on the Pacific front. I'd start getting ready as soon as our companies leave China. Much respect. May God protect you and your family. God protect us all.
    5
  5. ​ @scurra1163 we can't beat Russia. Their tech is better and their industrial capacity eclipses ours. In fact that holds true for NATO as a whole. Not to mention China, but Russia alone. Sorry to disappoint you. You should appreciate life instead of war. You should also hope the Russians and Chinese choose in the future, to be war mongers like your military. Otherwise....it's bleak.
    5
  6.  @bollewillem1  so from that reasoning, once the Iranians know where to look? Then what? Also why didn't the F-117 just simply fly over the canyons? How has stealth technology progressed since compared to radars and missiles? 🤔
    4
  7. When sandboxx gets desperate w their headlines and nitpicks.
    3
  8.  @bekeneel  Patriot is based off S-200. Why do you think the adversary doesn't have 'all in one' or integrated systems? Silly isn't it? It's not just 2 radars. There's more than a dozen for sure and counting.
    3
  9. ​ @bekeneel do the stealth planes have better ew capabilities than the Arleigh Burke Class destroyers? Which had to be towed out of the Black Sea? Or was it the Baltic Sea? Or did they just row their way out?
    3
  10.  @rickbase833  Did you hear me say that Iran has F-16's. Are you alright? 🤪 wtf do you know about aircraft?
    2
  11.  @rickbase833  yeah makes sense, and a crappy liar to boot. Or you were delivering pizzas for 27 years? And now retired? Or just 27 years old?
    2
  12. F-22 is probably overpriced. It might just as well be junk. It wouldn't be a surprise. Let theose other systems you mentioned be a clue. The F-35 is meant for sales. This vid says the F-22 is better than the J-20. And how would he know this? doesn't state any specs of the J-20 and I see many of the things he's touting the F-22 has, the J-20 also has. What's general knowledge is that the Chinese fighters have longer striking range. Before we listen to all the rest of that nonsense. Even before that, our mod is more interested in making money than fighting the Chinese and/or Russians. That's good and bad news. At least we don't plan on going to war with them. The fear mongering and crisis are good for sales.
    2
  13.  @actionjksn  You've seen nothing that was so dominant as the F-22 Raptor? was it in action?
    2
  14. What about a heat seeker in the general vicinity? What if the different radars were linked?
    2
  15. ​ @andyman8630 the F-35 can avoid lighting itself up by switching off its radar, using other radars. Is that supposed to be a strength?
    2
  16. ​ @bekeneel US stealth is based on Russian research from the 50's and 60's.
    2
  17.  @jamesricker3997  All planes are easy to track and Russia doesn't need so many SU-57's. It would be a waste of money, not so much as all those F-35's which you and I have payed for. You'd think they would at least be able to enter Russian airspace but no, they can't, unless they want to go on some kamikaze mission. Maybe, It would be hard to stop 1000 F-35's and a dozen of them would seep through launching a dozen nuclear missiles? Sound like a good idea? But at least they're doing what they're meant to do which isn't fighting against Russians. They're meant for making money.
    2
  18.  @randomautonomousdronepilot3384  The never downed a Kinzhal. You need elementary common sense to figure out that is propaganda level 1. If the Patriot System has a 15% interception rate versus normal cruise missiles, what makes you think they had 100% versus Kinzhals?
    2
  19. ​ @Dweller415 we're the paper tiger. Wake up. It could cost you if you don't.
    2
  20. ​ @jameskelly7412 'An F-35 is not an F-22.' Point being? 🤔
    2
  21. Did you make that up? Patriot has problems with cruise missiles. They officially claim 12-18%. Even that is hyped.
    1
  22.  @master_shifu4208  Patriot has 12-18% vs cruise missiles but, suddenly 100% on the first encounter versus hypersonic missiles. Maybe think critically a little bit. This video content is trash. That voice alone has destroyed many braincells. Why do you do that to yourself?
    1
  23. We copied the Soviets. Our stealth planes are based off of their research from the 50's and 60's. Fun fact.
    1
  24. Always so silly with 'they are copying us'. Here's a reality check: Our stealth planes are based off of Soviet research from the 50's and 60's. The Patriot system which has an interception rate of 15% vs today's cruise missiles is based off the S-200. If anything, the Chinese would copy the Russians. Why would they copy fraudulent American crap?
    1
  25. You've been following HERMEUS? 🤭 And?
    1
  26. Main ponts of the video: 1)Iranian disinfo:They lied. They said they could detect but that doesn't mean they can target. They can't target stealth planes is the assumption. 2)America fully expects these countries to detect their stealth planes. Since when? Today? 3)Russian disinfo:they don't have true hypersonic missiles citing the Kinzhal. Time to change their wiki article on the Kinzhal. The Kinzhal is the only missile in the Russian hypersonic arsenal. 4)That pandering voice is the hallmark of every channel devoted to the fight against propaganda
    1
  27.  @rickbase833  The tech is based on Russian research from the 50's and 60's. The upgraded F-16's can shoot down the stealth planes.
    1
  28.  @rickbase833  'cute'? And then you go on to blabber away. You know nothing, you're less than 27 years old, 20? And you lie and lie and lie. That's all you've been doing.
    1
  29.  @liammccarthy9388  you think aircraft are the future and not projectiles? Doesn't make sense.
    1
  30.  @pogo1140  AI? Wtf is that? 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  31.  @liammccarthy9388  Aircraft use missiles.
    1
  32. 'Can it be real?' 😂
    1
  33. These vids don't age well. Sorry
    1
  34.  @TheRezro  isn't targeting easier than detection?
    1
  35. Maybe? Maybe not? Depends? On the dozens of scenarios? Nice padding. We've arrived to 2 aircraft carriers getting sunk. It's 2023. Just wondering how on earth air power would be decisive in front of China's doorstep? Can anyone with higher than 100 iq explain it to me? Also, what da puck are the victory conditions? Because I'm soooo slow. Win Taiwan, then lose it, and lose the world? Nice trade?
    1
  36. They should start publishing the results of the sm 6 versus current cruise missiles. It could be fraudulent.
    1
  37. Gee I wonder why they are talking about UFO's now? Could it just be nonsense and a distraction? Yeah, I think so. Here's the ultimate proof: US military tech sucks.
    1
  38. This is a sorry sight. Sheeple actually think we're going to war with China. And rather than being stressed, they're actually elated by it.
    1
  39. Hello people. We're not going to war with China. That would be devastating to both sides. They would hit our mainland. Obviously no direct war with China. Maybe stop building those D.C. mansions with your tax money? 🧐
    1
  40. ​ @haventthoughtofanameyet6364 simulations in early 2023 show 20 scenarios on which we get our butts kicked, in all of them. Everything you said is based on hype and conjecture. Maybe start with the obvious:We're not going to war with China directly. These channels promote weapons sales. You pay for it. Understand the game. It's a joke and the joke is on you. Believe me you wouldn't a war w China. They don't need a navy to turn your nearest city into Bakhmut, within minutes, w conventional missiles, launched not only from nearby subs, but soon from missiles launched from their mainland. First notice the fundamentals. No nuclear war, no direct conventional wars, only proxy wars. Is it possible we lose proxy wars to Iran, Mexico, etc? Absolutely. Maybe a less belligerent stance will increase the safety of your nearest city.
    1
  41. ​ @dan725 are you Korean really? You're wrong. The 2 countries set to lose, and lose nearly everything is South Korea and the Philippines, from Chinese conventional weapons, possibly from Russian and North Korean as well if needed. The U.S. don't care. Really, they don't give a rat's behind. Btw they also control your military. A conventional war would be swift, probably decisive within the first several hours. Eg carriers would last on average, 20 minutes. In all 20 scenarios of the simulation, the US would lose badly. Just imagine how much worse it would be for the proxy countries. You're lucky not every Korean is in the dark.
    1
  42. ​ @s3cunit this is a washed up channel for 🐑
    1
  43. Was it necessary to talk about trash for 20 minutes? Or to do that day in and day out? I only hear your voice tiring slightly over the months. Talented.
    1
  44. ...and this is a testament to...all those suckers who bought the F-35's. Wtf is NGAD? 🤡
    1
  45. It's funny to see people arguing about nonsense esp when they're paying for this trash with their own tax money. Overpriced trash that barely works. As if they want to go to war, and is if in that war, their main land won't be touched by non-nuclear weapons, in minutes, and as if they would win. It's as if they live in another galaxy far far away. 🙃
    1
  46.  @hibatulwafi2523  I don't pay attention to such nonsense. Esp when there are much bigger things to look at, pretty much covering your periphery. How is it possible for you to miss those? The S-400 can easily track the F-35. The F-35 won't be going into Russian air space. There's a number of ways to track it, even with civilian equipment. STEALTH is a SCAM. NO SUCH THING AS STEALTH and AA systems can find them EASILY. An F-35 in Russian or Chinese airdpacne is a hunk of metal. The propaganda you swallow is meant for you to miss the big picture. Here's the bottom line: We won't be going to war with Russian and/or China. You know why? because we'd lose badly. Their tech is better, Russia's industry alone exceeds ours, it is much easier for them to mobilize whereas for us it's most likely not even possible without some serious destabilization. So you can see, we're not going to war w Russia and/or China. Do you want to have a war? Why not just go to the Ukranian front? (actually don't. You'll be dead around 20 minutes of deployment w/out seeing a single Russian.) You want to be drafted? you want our country to lose? You want your city to turn into rubble within minutes of someone launching a hypersonic missile of our coast from a sub? Check this: Deagel predictions USA 2025. Don't panic. It's just a war simulation. Only proxy wars.
    1
  47.  @trolleriffic  what does that have to do with it being overhyped? You see how many have been sold to our NATO allies and for the price. They're paying way too much for a plane that's not even going to attempt to enter Russian airspace. The bombers will be escorted by guess what? Non-stealth planes and fire from the perimeter of air defences. Didn't they tell you on this channel? Nope 🤡
    1
  48.  @trolleriffic  You drank the dogfight versus superior range koolaid. The Russian planes, (not just the SU-57) as well as the Chinese fighters have longer striking range.
    1
  49.  @cruise_missile8387  'general consensus' 🤣🙃🐑yeah, that's what these trash videos are for. In general, Russian planes are more independent while US planes need a whole suite of stuff for it to carry out it's missions. Knock any of it off, and the F-35 easily becomes a sitting duck. Yeah, we're so good, we can make flying ducks lol. Why do they make them that way? It's because we're not in the business of fighting Russians or Chinese militaries. Our military is in the business of making sales through fear, crises and giving our 'assurances' that we have the backs of our allies 🤭🤫So those suckers buy all our equipment. They're expensive to maintain as well. Who's going to maintain them? We may have our best stuff stashed away but it isn't the F-35. You know what else the F-35 is good for? carrying nukes. As deterrent our NATO buddies can carry them, and also to exert political and geopolitical pressure. But not to start an actual war. We're not going to get into a direct kinetic war versus Russia and/or China. We'd lose. There are other ways to fight war. Eg we use Ukraine to arm militant groups that support our geopolitical interests. Arms have shown up in Africa and Southeast Asia. Some have even showed up in the European black market. We also use Ukraine to help Ukraine pay off their debts. So yeah, you and I are paying off Ukrainian debts to others like Black Rock, IMF, World Bank, other governments, etc. As the mafia don, the US are extra nice aren't we? Others would just wack them outright but we help them to pay. Our main target is Europe. We don't trust them so we use Ukraine to de-industrialize them by cutting off their cheapest energy supply (Russia), and making them go green, also buying our ev cars, etc. We're able to do this by buying their politicians, even installing them after training them in our select universities, esp through England. Look at the big picture. No war, only proxy and hybrid war. The Russians and Chinese most likely don't a want war either. But if you continue to believe the trash you see on the news and the garbage from these channels, that's ok too. You're promoting sales. Remember, your military needs you(r money). Keep up the great work. high five
    1
  50.  @kwharrison6668  that was the latest kool-aid from some video yes? It's the second time I hear it. We don't live in the era of air-superiority. Read my other comment. There are no stealth planes going into hostile air-space. They operate from the perimeter.
    1