Comments by "Aachoo Crony" (@aachoocrony5754) on "Ukraine. Military Summary And Analysis 05.10.2022" video.

  1. Err no, Dima never said such things. He's not sloppy. Where did you get this btw?
    5
  2. Ukrainians report rarely which is a clue in itself. Of those reports for example at Kherson which was echoed by the Washington Post, they were slaughtered. Other reports from soldiers say they're getting beaten without seeing any Russians. From the Russian side, they're probably exaggerating/underexaggerating but considering they are at the winning end, the in-between number is closer to the Russian version. The Russians are heavily outnumbered 5:1. Crazy. Ukrainians seem to be attacking in small groups taking advantage of their numbers while the Russians outgun the Ukrainians. Fog of war is definitely on until 300k Russians increase the Russian ranks by almost 3x.
    5
  3.  @jamesgornall5731  obviously he's not saying that. Thats your usual line of fraudulent nitpicking for argument's sake.
    3
  4.  @MaxMustermann-mi7bd  you're getting much warmer except that they said 'to the last Ukrainian.' We all have a hard time accepting the fact they they meant it LITERALLY.
    2
  5.  @KingcupXI  well yeah. Look at the map. Come on man!!
    2
  6. You realize you're mocking yourself with that statement don't you? Is shows its working.
    2
  7.  @MrVeryfrost  yes apparently thats what you're trying to do. You realize the victim of these Parthian tactics always think they're gaining the upperhand? Thats the key. I'm not sure the Ukrainian army is as dumb as the pro-Ukrainian followers, yet they will be prey to this strategy. The Russians suffered itvfrom the Mongols. They used it themselves on Poland/Kiev, Napoleon/Borodino, Germans/Moscow. In those encounters the bith sides had heavy casualties. Unlike here. <----Thats the red flag right there. I'm not saying its definite as I'm sure the NATO is weary of the incoming 300k troops and will prepare as much as possible. What can they do when the numerical ofds change from 5:1 to 2:1? Will be interesting esp in the winter.
    2
  8. He must've gotten it from something. What was his reasoning?
    1
  9.  @Ofasia777  he's no bot. He's also Algerian. ... ... Come on man!
    1
  10.  @joeyboi83  yes he's biased towards Russia like me. I also listen to Defense Politics Asia and Weeb Union. I trust them more when Russians are losing battles. But I always appreciate his analysis regardless. I don't see him too far off. I don't see the 3 of them so different actually.
    1
  11.  @rrsafety  yeah numbers are probably just estimates with a bit of tinkering.
    1
  12. Everyone knows Ukrainian casualties are much higher than the Russian side. At least double. Estimates are double to quadruple. And everyone knows they've been doing this with 5:1 numerical disadvantage. THAT IS FACKING HISTORICAL VS A PEER TRAINED ARMY. But not quite, because the Russians have a lot more firepower. They can't make an offensive right now. The battlefront is too long. The 5:1 disadvantage is turning into a 2:1 disadvantage. Its going to be interesting.
    1
  13.  @m3c4nyku43  Yes, 'to the last Ukrainian.' This was known well before the war started. NATO, or the U.S. rather want Ukraine destroyed. They've already raped it to the bone financially, not quite to the barebone, some things are left. At this point, its better if Russia takes all and nulls all Ukrainian debt. I have doubts the Russians will do anything about the debt though.
    1
  14. This is nothing new. Its called Parthian tactics and the Russians tasted it from the Mongols. The Russians used it themselves against the Poles/Kiev, Napoleon/Borodino, Germans/Moscow. Losses were heavy on both sides unlike here. Definitely a red flag imo esp in lieu of the fact that the number of Russian operatives will more than double. They've been operating against odds of 5:1 until now. They don't have the manpower to attack and the Ukrainians are attacking the thin line in its weak spots. They should've done this long ago.
    1
  15.  @MrVeryfrost  when you see all that drama of the Russian side pointing fingers of blame eg the Chechen leader calling out the general in charge of Lyman, directing the battle from 150km away, it smells like Parthian/Mongol tactics. Really? Why was that guy 150km away? I have a feeling it wasn't because he was incompetent. They also dismissed the general from the Kharkov front. That is strange since it was lightly defended and he had a limited number of troops at his disposal. Both sides fuel the nuke talk. Again, it was the Chechen leader doing the dirty talking. As if the Russians are desperate. Funny how both sides are peddling the same propaganda. 🤔 The Chechen leader was just promoted right after he was chastised for his nuclear weapons rhetoric. 🤔
    1