Comments by "Aachoo Crony" (@aachoocrony5754) on "Ukraine SITREP: Day 202 (13/9) - Multiple Ukrainian offensives thwarted; Lyman offensive failed" video.

  1.  @nicknucks661  If it didn't mean anything to you why did you have to rub it in? To show it was insignificant or that you don't get it?
    3
  2.  @nicknucks661  sorry, I thought you were being sarcastic lol. Oh sh1t, gotta watch for this guy! ;-)
    3
  3. I think its purely pr. You can see by how they're ramping up the propaganda-probably to distract from the economic situation. People dying are not the concern-in fact they want them to fight until the last Ukrainian(!)
    1
  4.  @warefareinnutshell5330  yeah that's ofcourse legit. Its logistics afterall. Just saying my 2 cents that the 1st motivation for them was publicity since its been looking bad for them. I take it as an admission that they've been losing the propaganda war that they had to pull this stunt. Things definitely change w winter coming and the Ukrainians need to supply their troops accordingly. Manouevers will be more difficult and positions could either be more hidden or exposed. You make a good point. Logistics are more crucial in the winter and it could be a more legit motive behind this operation than for pr.
    1
  5.  @giovanni-ed7zq  lol. Biased much? Glass half full or half empty?
    1
  6.  @giovanni-ed7zq  Not only are you trying to convince us that Ukraine an underequipped and undertrained army is going to win, but that the climax has already passed and they've won. What are the reasons for you assessment? Did you look at the map? When the Russians turned off the lights what was going on in your head? When they shot that missile deep into Ukraine terroritory to destroy that missile depot early on what did you think? you should've gotten the message. The Ukrainians can't win with their current supply and training. In fact they've been losing-horrendously. Look at the map. The Russians have already taken the more industrious easter Russian regions. Ukraine is already finished. Odessa and Transnitstria are next and Ukraine is landlocked. They are already landlocked if Russia so choses. You are missing the elephants in the room. Assistance to Ukraine has diminished. The country was already lost before the war. How is it going to pay off its debts? it was already impossible before the war. It has lost much more soldiers than the Russians even during this counteroffensive as per pro-Ukrainian sources. 5:1 ratio. This is not getting beaten. This is an outright slaughter. And the Russians have done this with less troops albeit with better and more numerous equipment. Yes, HIMARS HIMARS HIMARS which they talk about all the time is inferior to the Russian counterpart in range, payload and rate of fire. One last elephant in the room is: check the map. Notice something in general. Now look at whats next. Odessa and Transnistria. You might ask why Russia hasn't taken more of the central part of Ukraine. If they did, Ukrainian society would capitulate. Fighting over that territory would destroy the farmlands which feed the country as well as Europe. The fight over that land would also be quick as the land is flat and open. Russia is being very nice. Ukraine was never meant to win. It was meant to lose. Yes, you're a loser just like they are. The winners are Russia and the U.S. Brainfack isn't it? You don't get it. You're so emotionally invested and not even on the right side. What propaganda has fed your head full of mushrooms? You have no idea of the big picture beyond this war and the SH!TSHOW they have prepared for you. That's another topic. I thought I explained some of it to you. You must be blind yes? behehehehe
    1
  7.  @giovanni-ed7zq  Putin is begging for negotiations? says who?
    1
  8.  @giovanni-ed7zq  thats bias as well. Getting more weapons. If they use more high grade weapons, Russians will also in kind. Both sides are hesitant to reveal their weapons if you haven't noticed. This war isn't representative of modern warfare. If it was, it would be MUCH MORE DEVASTATING. Non-nuclear conventional warfare. Btw that would include nukes for the Russians-they can use them conventionally in a variety of ways including without fallout. They're way ahead of us by decades. Our satellites are better I think. Don't know about the Chinese.
    1
  9.  @giovanni-ed7zq  Russia is using older and older equipment? lol says who? Ukraine has the power back on? Your bias has no limits. Its easy to destroy the power grid. It was always easier to destroy then build. Any more biases you want to share with us? So farm you haven't mentioned the economy. The western economy is about to implode. That's why you see the sh1tstorm you've been seeing lately-and you think Ukrainians are winning out of all sides AHAHAHAHAHA. The US and Russia are winning. Ukraine loses 1diot. Sorry. When are you going wake up? Wars, pandemics etc etcand to be continued. Have you checked out Agenda 2030 yet? The World Economic Forum? Davos? no. Pretty sad. You're the definition of a sheeple. As for the Ukraine war, the US wants to delay the Russian-European alliance. Russia wants to kick the US out of Europe. These aare 3 seperate sides who don't trust eaach other and view each other as competitors. There, I just spoon fed it to you. Someone had to do it. Go look up agenda 2030, WEF, Davos. How many times do I have to tell you this? beheheheehe zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    1
  10.  @giovanni-ed7zq  you went back to square one. Dud you read any of my comment or just lazy? In denial?
    1
  11.  @theodoresmith5272  biased much? 6 points? Go read the Washington Post for the 5:1 ratio. You know, the Pro-Ukrainian Washington Post. Why do you think Ukrainians are more motivated than Russians? Thats fundamentally flawed.
    1