Comments by "Highonlife24" (@Highonlife24) on "Ring Magazine" channel.

That’s pure boxing dude.
4
Then you are delusional.
3
@ Ali didn’t have CTE he had Parkinson’s. Those are two completely different diseases and Parkinson’s has nothing to do with boxing, and CTE doesn’t make you lose control of movement. You have no idea what you are talking about.
2
He took big shots but the more efficient shots and big shots landed all together was clearly Usyk.
2
No they were not as most of his shots got to the body or head.
1
Sorry but in the pros Ali has the better resume. Usyk is definitely one of the goats but I’m not putting him over Ali, or Louis, or Lewis. Definitely over Tyson as Tyson isn’t top 10 to me, and just over Holyfield.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv By many losses you mean 5 out of his 56 wins? Thats not many losses. And he did unify the division as he was also undisputed champion lol. And those 5 losses can be attributed to his prime being stolen from him and his declining health due to early stage Parkinson’s. And yet he avenged 3 of those 5 losses. And he couldn’t avenge the last two due to his Parkinson’s being at their late stages. Ali fought way more hall of fame tier opponents than Usyk and had way more victories at the pro level.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv And Usyk won more belts because Ali fought in a era where the cruiserweight division didn’t even exist even though Ali was only 9 pounds above a cruiserweight and would dominate if he was in the cruiserweight division today. So Usyk having more belts isn’t an argument.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv And no he didn’t do everything better as he only has fought like 5 fights as a heavyweight. While Ali has fought and won 56 fights. So that’s silly.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv And he’s not smaller than Ali. They are the same height at 6’3. You clearly don’t know anything about Ali.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv Boxing didn’t beat Ali as Ali remained an icon. What are you even talking about?
1
@ No 5 losses is not a lot and the 4 belt era is irrelevant because the 4 belt era is an extremely young era that didn’t become a thing until the 80s which didn’t exist when Ali was around. So again very dumb argument.
1
@ And Ali lost those fights due to having his prime years stolen from him and Parkinson’s and he avenged those losses. Usyk never had to fight that many fights as Ali did and Usyk is on top of a very weak heavyweight division. With only 5 heavyweight fights in his record. With him not even close to beating the other top contenders in his divisions. So sorry but he isn’t above Ali.
1
@ Ali did accomplish more than Usyk as he actually clears out the heavyweight division. Usyk didn’t.
1
@ The only person who doesn’t know boxing is you. While I agree Usyk should retire as he’s pushing 40, that doesn’t change the fact I can’t put him on Ali’s level due to the sheer lack of heavyweight fights. He’s certainly near or in the top 10 goats but not over Ali.
1
@ What does Usyk fighting Porter as a welterweight in the division have to do with anything?
1
@ Yes he did clear the cruiserweight division, a division that didn’t exist when Ali was around so what is your point?
1
@ He did fight more because he beat more guys and hall of Famers than Usyk at heavyweight despite having 5 losses which he avenged 3 out of 5. So yeah I can’t put say Ali is better and Usyk is dominant in a weaker era if heavyweight boxing many of the guys he beat would have gotten destroyed by heavyweights in previous eras including Ali’s
1
@ And what does him winning a tournament dedicated to Ali have to do with anything? How is that an argument?
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv Again, Usyk and Ali are the same size so that’s a bad argument.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv 5 losses due to having his prime years stolen from him and health problems and yet he beat way more people than Usyk, basic concept.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv No it isn’t an excuse it’s a fact.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv Again, that division didn’t exist when Ali was around so using Usyk clearing it as a reason he’s better than Ali is a bad one. And again Ali actually cleared the heavyweight division. Usyk hasn’t. He fought 5 heavyweights.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv And Ali is higher pound for pound than Usyk because he defeated way more big names opponents as a heavyweight and won way more fights. The 5 losses due to other circumstances doesn’t change that. Do you think Usyk would be undefeated had he been banned from boxing for 3 years and suffered a disease progressing through his body affecting his movement and muscles? No he wouldn’t. So using those 5 losses against Ali is very dumb.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv And Fury was not the tallest heavyweight champion ever, that was Valuev, who was 7’0. And Usyk said it himself size doesn’t matter. Usyk isn’t even the shortest heavyweight champion in history and being 6’9 or taller doesn’t make you the best boxer ever. And Fury is no all time great and he has many flaws as a fighter who has a lackluster resume with his only big named fights being Wilder a bum with no skills but a right hand, Wallin who messed up Fury in which the fight should have been stopped due to the massive cut Fury had, and Usyk. Not to mention Fury got knocked down by an MMA fighter who never boxed before. I don’t know why you are trying to hype Fury up like he’s some type of GOAT that is a major flex in beating.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv And agin, Usyk is 6’3 like Ali not 6’2.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv 5 losses due to having prime years stolen and Parkinson’s. My argument still stands and 56 wins is more impressive than 23 especially only 5 of those 23 wins were at the heavyweight division. My argument stands.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv That doesn’t change the fact Valuev was the tallest heavyweight in history not Fury. I never said Valuev was a great champion, you are moving the goalpost. You said that Fury was the tallest heavyweight champion in history, that is factually incorrect. Accept the fact you are wrong and move on.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv So you are making laughing emojis based on an argument I never made. Do you realize how much of a clown you are looking right now?
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv And you still haven’t established how Fury is an all time great by any means.
1
@ Again, Usyk has only a few wins as a heavyweight and barely fought the rest of the top contenders. A few losses on a record doesn’t outweigh that.
1
@ He beat 5 guys. That doesn’t make him THE GOAT.
1
@jamesmurphy-pb2cv And yes the guys with multiple losses can compare because they beat way more than 5 guys as heavyweights. And I’m certainly not putting Usyk higher than Louis who reigned as Champion for 11 years.
1
He is not top 20 not even top 50.
1