Comments by "Highonlife24" (@Highonlife24) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1. Mormons are just another distinct denomination of Christianity.
    8
  2.  D-1-V-A Okay, he didn’t say he had a solution lol.
    6
  3.  @jacknewton1205  And being likable is irrelevant to me when we are talking about the facts. In the debate sphere your goal isn’t to be liked, but to prove that your arguments are the correct ones based on the evidence. Nothing more.
    4
  4. More like 100% delusional and incoherent.
    4
  5. He clearly was.
    4
  6. Yes because a streamer with over 800k subscribers, constantly being invited to debates with big names political pundits on both sides of the political aisle , and being on many podcasts discussing politics, social issues, and everyday topics is definitely having “your career going down”. Lol.
    4
  7. Because he actually speaks facts? lol.
    3
  8. Sure they would.
    3
  9. 🙄
    3
  10. @ Doesn’t change the fact they identify as Christian. Being a separate denomination, it isn’t surprising that they have separate scriptures. Many do.
    3
  11. @ Trump failing every court case to get the election overturned including in courts with republican Judges who found no evidence of voter fraud.
    2
  12.  @DoctorWondertainment-sb9ee  every single one of his court cases getting thrown out even by Republican judges as there was zero evidence of voter fraud.
    2
  13.  @DoctorWondertainment-sb9ee  All of his court cases to overturned the election getting thrown out due to lack of evidence of any type of fraud.
    2
  14. So a competent debater that actually has facts to back it up?
    2
  15.  @DoctorWondertainment-sb9ee He literally made substantive arguments backed by evidence the entire debate lol.
    2
  16. And yet he doesn’t say anything educated.
    2
  17.  @jacknewton1205  Not really because all these people are making arguments that are false and Destiny is simply calling them out on it.
    2
  18. And yet there is a guy in the center of that room who wants to eradicate Trans people.
    2
  19. I don’t see a problem with this.
    2
  20. How?
    1
  21.  @Tripster234  You’re not being very clear. Maximalist position how?
    1
  22. What conspiracy theory was “true”? Lol.
    1
  23. @ Can you actually say what things he said that were not facts? Actually articulate your argument instead of throwing around school yard insults like an immature child?
    1
  24. Their minds are perfectly fine. They’re not the ones trying to eradicate people.
    1
  25. @ “slaughtering babies” okay.
    1
  26.  @5537a  Again, what evidence did they have to back up their claims?
    1
  27. That’s everybody on this panel.
    1
  28. @ He really didn’t lol.
    1
  29.  @wiiztec  He did actually, because he cited his arguments.
    1
  30. @ You’re a clown.
    1
  31.  @brittanycunningham787  I don’t smoke on ignorance like you guys.
    1
  32.  @robadzso  🤡
    1
  33. @ Knowles.
    1
  34. So one person calling Kirk’s creepy smile just that creepy is what you call rudeness? Don’t do creepy stuff like that and you won’t get called out for that.
    1
  35. @ You have to actually explain how they were rude other than pushing back very hardly on Kirk’s views on abortion. Amon other things.
    1
  36.  @mattsartor3010  You need actual examples and evidence. Not vague statements. How has he tanked? When he has over 800k subscribers and he’s being featured on major platforms like Jubilee and has debated major figures on both sides of the political aisle. And how does he move the goalpost? Again I need actual examples, not vague statements.
    1
  37.  @mattsartor3010  “Any actual credible political analyst sees him and Sam Seder as imbeciles” again how? What arguments that they make show this? And that seems more so your own opinion not the opinion of political analysts.
    1
  38.  @mattsartor3010  And him not being a libertarian like Scott Horton and Dave Smith isn’t an argument.
    1
  39. @ no not rightly so.
    1
  40.  @CryptoCPA  That depends what “true followers of Christ” even means because according to each and every single person of whatever denomination of Christianity no matter how extreme or passive, you all think you are the “true followers of Christ”.
    1
  41. How, they articulated their points.
    1
  42.  @grimmcreeper192  He cut them off multiple times. Don’t dish it out if you can’t take it.
    1
  43. @ He cut them off just as many times and when they were trying to articulate their points he would interject mid sentence. I’m not denying that people didn’t cut him off but to pretend that he wasn’t doing the exact same thing from the very start is disingenuous and he’s has done that multiple times and does this in every single debate he does.
    1
  44. @ And they never backtracked. Can you actually articulate a point that any of them backtracked or were proven wrong about while also providing a time stamp so I can review it?
    1
  45.  @grimmcreeper192  As for the two spirited peoples argument all he said was the origins where it came from that the woman didn’t know. He didn’t at all prove why two spirited people aren’t an example of trans and then they moved on to the next argument. So not only was that not a backtrack Knowles didn’t even established how it’s not trans.
    1
  46. @ But trans people have existed throughout history as another example of Native American tribes having trans people. And the the term two spirited people itself is a modern term but the concept in Native tribes have existed for centuries pre colonial America as tribes had males and females who felt that they had different roles to play in a gender sense than what they were born and these men and women switched and dressed the opposite and act the opposite of traditional men and women. So Knowles is making the misleading claim that transgenderism among the Native American is modern because a women came up with the term when that is false. The term itself is modern but the beliefs and practices are not.
    1
  47. @ For you not to understand that makes me believe that you have no idea what you are talking about.
    1
  48. @ I haven’t resorted to any tactics.
    1
  49. @ And repeating the same comment twice doesn’t make you any less incorrect.
    1
  50.  @grimmcreeper192  And I’ve never heard of a commenting twice glitch with myself or people that I have chatted with but okay whatever you say.
    1