Comments by "madd hatter" (@maddhatter3564) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. bull. you buy the big enviro hype.Wake up.
    14
  2. but none of those were forced by govenment. they were organic. If EVs are so superior why do governments need to mandate them?
    2
  3. well you seem to be comparing a new EV to a worn out 90s ICE car. new ICE cars are very quiet and where do you get the insane idea of a gas smell? again if the car is in good repair you dont have that except during fuel up and thats only outside and for a short time.
    2
  4.  @malcolm8564  so you want to starve those trees you hug?
    1
  5.  @erikdedecker1943  here, have some more Kool-Aid
    1
  6.  @troygalbraith625  yet there are still mandates. the urban city dweller may do ok with EV but what about those of us that live in the country? wait i got this, they want all of us to move into megacities.
    1
  7. I noticed this with german made equipment i work with. The newer stuff is a disgrace, nothing like the german engineering of old. sad really, the Quality mercedes was legendary for can no longer be found.
    1
  8. if you cant see that millions of EVs charging on the grid doesnt affect the grid then you are beyond logic.
    1
  9.  @falloutgirl2230  ya we thought we would have flying cars by now as well.
    1
  10.  @alanjm1234  plus the estimates of the cost to charge is vastly under rated. its not the $7 or $8 they claim. They convieniently forgrt to mention that $.14 KW/HR average is before all the add on fees and sur charges, and they insinuate charging is 100% efficient (which it is not) They use the "a 10kwh battery takes 10 kwh to charge at $.14 per KWH. thats before all the addon charges and that 10 kwh uses nearly twice that to charge.
    1
  11. so you dont use your car in the daytime?
    1
  12.  @IgorEngelen1974  well the goal is to not put your hands IN the gas.
    1
  13.  @lukeusherwood2525  ok its WIKI it MUST be right.
    1
  14.  @SergePavlovsky  they seem to be comparing new EVs to worn out 80s and 90s cars with over 200k on them, maybe thats the only way EVs come out on top.
    1
  15.  @apostolakisl  doesnt change the cost of the battery.
    1
  16.  @FLPhotoCatcher  ya EVs NEVER break down, the batteries last forever. go peddal it to the gullible
    1
  17.  @scotttovey  thank you for the EV propaganda.
    1
  18.  @channelsofash  and there are many faild "shiney new tech" as well. Remember EVs died once already in the early 1900s.
    1
  19.  @vjanssens399  it very much is. and your Hype is full od flaws.
    1
  20.  @channelsofash  but during that time the electric car died. funny you use that arguement.
    1
  21. obviously you havent worked the numbers. it would take more PV panels than could fit on 5 EVs to even slow charge one.
    1
  22. misleading info, Its not Tucker saying this, ITS HIS GUEST. thank you for identifying your channel as leftist propaganda so early on.
    1
  23. Ok you brought your left wing politics into a purely scientific discussion. All your views are now suspect.bye
    1
  24. to miss sabine, since you are so sure "fossil fuel" is from fossils and NOT a naturally occuring element , then tell me , why in west Texas where i live oil wells refill after being left shut down for a few years?
    1
  25. Id ride a train if i could get off in 1995
    1
  26. i think we should discover human intelligence before we work on artificial
    1