Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "CRUX" channel.

  1. Feigning a surrender IS A WAR CRIME. it implies "perfidy". If one, like the Russian soldier in the video, comes out shooting, then the whole enemy unit is supposed to have feigned surrender and set up an ambush. You are in battle, and It's not like in battle you're looking for which enemy is shooting at you and which one hasn't started yet. At that point you have to look solely at the safety of YOUR unit. Especially since the "surrendered" had not yet been searched. Fighting enemies are shot at. It's not like they're playing paintball. If there had been, there, on the ground, with the machine gun, keeping the "surrendered" at gunpoint, a NATO soldier, professional and perfectly educated on international war conventions, at the very moment when the Russian had come out firing, I expect he would have pulled the trigger, only to release it in one of the following two cases: 1) when he was sure that none of the enemies could move anymore. 2) because the belt had ended.
    262
  2. Wagnerites "dragging the dead bodies of their friends". LOL! They usually leave even the wounded ones behind like garbage. They even think they are "fighting against the entire Ukrainian Army near Bakhmut"! 😂
    71
  3. They also shot down two Valkyrie fighters and One Gundam.
    27
  4. Several dozen launchers. The ratio is usually around 25 missiles for launcher.
    11
  5.  @paulstone9667  As stated in the clip, the number was at the start of March, so at two weeks from the invasion and more than a month ago. As for putting hands in pocket, the Italian government gave Ukraine 110 million Euros cash already on February 26 to spend for whatever they wanted. When a government gives away weapons it manufactures instead, it was really financing his own industries.
    10
  6. They destroyed a Reliant Robin tank.
    6
  7.  @dailyvideoforpatriotism5371  There is no shooting of prisoners here. There are no prisoners. Feigning a surrender IS A WAR CRIME. it implies "perfidy". If one, like the Russian soldier in the video comes out shooting, then the whole enemy unit is supposed to have feigned surrender and set up an ambush. You are in battle, and It's not like in battle you're looking for which enemy is shooting at you and which one hasn't started yet. At that point you have to look solely at the safety of YOUR unit. Especially since the "surrendered" had not yet been searched. Fighting enemies are shot at. It's not like they're playing paintball. If there had been, there, on the ground, with the machine gun, keeping the "surrendered" at gunpoint, a NATO soldier, professional and perfectly educated on international war conventions, at the very moment when the Russian had come out firing, I expect he would have pulled the trigger, only to release it in one of the following two cases: 1) when he was sure that none of the enemies could move anymore. 2) because the belt had ended.
    5
  8.  @gamingatlantic2383  Had them been searched? No. So how do you know they were "unarmed"?
    5
  9. Several dozen launchers. The ratio is usually 25 missiles for launcher, and the given number was for the beginning of March, so when the war just started.
    4
  10. 😂😂If this war demonstrated something, is that the Russian army is a joke.
    4
  11.  @briant5685  Feigning a surrender IS A WAR CRIME. it implies "perfidy". There is nothing "Russia should reciprocate". They are UN certified war criminals ALREADY. If the Ukrainians follow international war conventions, is not because Russians aren't animals. If one, like the Russian soldier in the video, comes out shooting, then the whole enemy unit is supposed to have feigned surrender and set up an ambush. You are in battle, and It's not like in battle you're looking for which enemy is shooting at you and which one hasn't started yet. At that point you have to look solely at the safety of YOUR unit. Especially since the "surrendered" had not yet been searched. Fighting enemies are shot at. It's not like they're playing paintball. If there had been, there, on the ground, with the machine gun, keeping the "surrendered" at gunpoint, a NATO soldier, professional and perfectly educated on international war conventions, at the very moment when the Russian had come out firing, I expect he would have pulled the trigger, only to release it in one of the following two cases: 1) when he was sure that none of the enemies could move anymore. 2) because the belt had ended.
    4
  12. Yeah. "sorry, we are too busy with our own problems to fight nazism now. Next time maybe". Interesting then the link you estabilished between "only thinks about getting rich" with giving Ukraine weapons to defend themselves for free. Like you have to use a slogan that seemed good for any season. BTW, I'm Italian too, but that's the reason I prefer to never attend Italian comment sections. The sheer amount of empty populism is too much to bear.
    3
  13.  @Administrator0101  Come dovrebbe fare un governo a "diventare ricco" cedendo armi gratuitamente quindi? Lascia perdere. Pensa agli aeroplanini del tuo profilo, che di economia capisci una sega. BTW, non si può essere un "ex veterano" (nel tuo caso poi vabbè, avrai 16 anni al massimo...).
    3
  14.  @dailyvideoforpatriotism5371  According to the Geneva Convention. THE RUSSIANS COMMITTED A WAR CRIME, NOT THE UKRAINIANS. Feigning a surrender IS A WAR CRIME. it implies "perfidy". Killing enemies in battle is not a war crime.
    3
  15. Judging by how Russians are using them on the Battlefield, they are probably of much better use in parades.
    3
  16.  @inesfi66166  Wanna be POWs have the responsability of not attacking their captors. If they attack their captors, they are not POWs, but combatants and criminals because FEIGNING A SURRENDER IS A WAR CRIME, and enemy combatants are shot at. The only one who is defending criminals here is you. FEIGNING A SURRENDER IS A WAR CRIME. it implies "perfidy", and the Russians feigned a surrender. The reason you have to side with criminals is not of my concern. Soldiers have no responsability to search for anything while they are attacked. Under attack they only have to look for their personal security and that of their unit. Attackers are no POWs but combatants and criminals because FEIGNING A SURRENDER IS A WAR CRIME, and enemy combatants are shot at.
    3
  17.  @urbandream7051  Apart that "impossible" is a pretty long word. They dont' need actually. 1) Recaptured Kherson, the connection would be lost anyway, since the Crimean Isthmus would be at shelling distance. All the struggle for Mariupol would have been for nothing. 2) The port of Sevastopol is at anti-ship missile range from Odessa. It only needs for Ukraine to obtain those missiles to lock the Russian Black Sea Fleet in port. A worse strategical situation than before the war started.
    3
  18.  @urbandream7051  Nothing is "easy", but it's feasible. Russians failed to take Mikolaiv and are losing positions in the area. The frontline is actually only 10 miles from the city. Because Ukraine is not "under attack"? Russians already tried, and failed, to reach Odessa.
    3
  19.  @urbandream7051  Number of "flag ships"? There is ONE flagship for fleet. The Moskva would be, with the General Belgrano, the biggest warship sunk in action since WWII.
    3
  20. A fly-by of turrets had been performed Being them in low orbit, they were not visible to naked eyes.
    2
  21. Yes, it's war crime, and yes, the perpetrators had been punished immediately. It's a Russian war crime, and the Russians died. Feigning a surrender IS A WAR CRIME. it implies "perfidy". If one, like the Russian soldier in the video comes out shooting, then the whole enemy unit is supposed to have feigned surrender and set up an ambush. You are in battle, and It's not like in battle you're looking for which enemy is shooting at you and which one hasn't started yet. At that point you have to look solely at the safety of YOUR unit. Especially since the "surrendered" had not yet been searched. Fighting enemies are shot at. It's not like they're playing paintball. If there had been, there, on the ground, with the machine gun, keeping the "surrendered" at gunpoint, a NATO soldier, professional and perfectly educated on international war conventions, at the very moment when the Russian had come out firing, I expect he would have pulled the trigger, only to release it in one of the following two cases: 1) when he was sure that none of the enemies could move anymore. 2) because the belt had ended.
    2
  22. Russia deployed the best they had. You see few T90 because Russia had few of them in respect to the older T80 and T72. The Russian Army has a "coat of paint" of modern equipment, to cover a mass of soviet one.
    2
  23.  @zulfanirich7594  They also claimed to have destroyed more Himars than Ukraine ever had, yet, for some reason, those keep on launching. Not to say of the alleged destruction of Leclerc tanks.
    2
  24. Russians can really made to believe anything.
    2
  25.  @paulstone9667  NLAW is short range only. 800m max vs. static targets, more 400m max vs. moving ones. It's also an exclusively AT weapon. It requires a magnetic mass to detonate. It's good for ambushes in the wooden terrain of northern Ukraine, much less for the open fields of Donbass. MILAN is longer range, 2000m originally, 3000m extended range. You have to stay in visual contact, but the distance makes you safer. You can also fire TO buildings, helicopters and any kind of cover. Can't do that with NLAW. MILAN-2 has also a thermal image system. NLAW is blind at night. Italy is phasing out the MILAN, but the replacement is a combination of Spike for long range and Panzerfaust-3 for short range.
    2
  26. Several dozen launchers. The ratio is usually 25 missiles for launcher, and the given number was for the beginning of March, so when the war just started.
    2
  27.  @NorthonBruce  Had them been searched? No. So how do you decided they were "unarmed"?
    2
  28. After 6 years, it's still not even clear what the MGCS should be. Light, medium or heavy tank? All of them, with different add-on modules? Drone launching platform? For the French the production model is scheduled for 2040 at best and in the meantime the Poles, needing real tanks and not paper ones, allied with the S.Koreans. Combining the know-how of Rheinmetall, Leonardo (that also means OTO-Melara automatic guns) and Saab, they would easily come with something better than a Leo 2 A8, or any possible upgrade of the Leo 2 chassis, in much less time.
    2
  29.  @urbandream7051  Are you jocking? Youtube has a function for searching. Post 'Mycolaiv' there and you'll see every kind of reports directly from the city.
    2
  30. It's not some kind of military secret. Journalists are not obliged to keep secrets that are being kept only for internal political reasons.
    2
  31.  @zainiabdullah621  Yeah, yeah. Allah Snackbar.
    2
  32.  @chingis1154  Russians don't need hypotetical war crimes. They already committed thousands for real.
    1
  33.  @somewhatdamaged2946  Have you some proof of Ukrainians feigning a surrender?
    1
  34.  @Rome-z6q  If one, like the Russian soldier in the video, comes out shooting, then the whole enemy unit is supposed to have feigned surrender and set up an ambush. You are in battle, and It's not like in battle you're looking for which enemy is shooting at you and which one hasn't started yet. At that point you have to look solely at the safety of YOUR unit. Especially since the "surrendered" had not yet been searched. If there had been, there, on the ground, with the machine gun, keeping the "surrendered" at gunpoint, a NATO soldier, professional and perfectly educated on international war conventions, at the very moment when the Russian had come out firing, I expect he would have pulled the trigger, only to release it in one of the following two cases: 1) when he was sure that none of the enemies could move anymore. 2) because the belt had ended. If the machine gunner didn't give them the time to move, all the better. He had been efficient.
    1
  35.  @rigux10  Have you some proof of people systematically shot in the head?
    1
  36.  @schutzanzug4518  Your argument doesn't make any sense, and reveals a fundamental ignorance of war customs. The "person who came out" revealed his alignment the moment he started shooting. To not be recognisable as a combatant before starting to shoot IS A WAR CRIME. so, by your own reasoning, the Russians committed YET ANOTER WAR CRIME. "probably" is just your guessing. As already said, if there had been, there, on the ground, with the machine gun, keeping the "surrendered" at gunpoint, a NATO soldier, professional and perfectly educated on international war conventions, at the very moment when the Russian had come out firing, I expect he would have pulled the trigger, only to release it in one of the following two cases: 1) when he was sure that none of the enemies could move anymore. 2) because the belt had ended. If the machine gunner managed to kill all of them before any of them had the time to move, well done, he had been efficient. "execute" is just your guessing. As already said, if one, like the Russian soldier in the video, comes out shooting, then the whole enemy unit is supposed to have feigned surrender and set up an ambush. You are in battle, and It's not like in battle you're looking for which enemy is shooting at you and which one hasn't started yet. At that point you have to look solely at the safety of YOUR unit. Especially since the "surrendered" had not yet been searched. If you fear hell, then then why you are trying to water down not one but two war crimes, while at the same time inventing others?
    1
  37.  @schutzanzug4518  What you care or not is not of my concern. "retaliation" is another guessing of you. The shooter injuring or killing someone is of no importance. It only needs for him to fire, or to be going to.
    1
  38. Ohhh! 1000! After 45 days of siege. 1000! Russian army is suffering like 500 KIA a day.
    1
  39. Leonardo means also OTO-Melara automatic guns.
    1
  40. The tanks sent on the frontline are those taken out of the deposits and refurbished. Apart few dozens of T14 in several years, Russia has not built any new tank in decades. They have no more the tooling to build new T72, T80 or T90.
    1
  41.  @phongnguyen007  They tought to end the war in three days. Now they are using all that they have, modern or not, because they haven't other possibilities.
    1
  42.  @phongnguyen007  They are not even saying "we are using crap in Ukraine and keeping our super-duper best equipment in storage" for that matter. You can believe the column headed to Kiev was a "diversion" if you please.
    1
  43.  @phongnguyen007  So they don't need to say they believed to end the war in three days. It's evident from what they have done, while that they are using the best they have is evident from what you can see.
    1
  44.  @meso8848  According to the Geneva convention feigning a surrender is a war crime. Offering surrender and then shooting is feigning a surrender. The Russian came out of the building shooting during the surrender. The Russians feigned a surrender, so they committed a war crime. One of many. Russians, not Ukrainians, are UN certified war criminals. Russia, not Ukraine, is EU certified terrorist state.
    1
  45.  @luminatrixfanfiction  They were caught on camera, feigning their surrender and shooting on their captors. You just love to lie, don't you? You love war criminals.
    1
  46.  @coryaw95  One of the Russians started shooting, and it had been recorded. So the surrender had been feigned, because, if they had really surrendered, NONE of them should have shot. Feigning a surrender is a war crime. Once one started shooting, that's not a taking of prisoners any more. It's a fight, and, in a fight, enemies are shoot at. It's as simple as that.
    1
  47.  @realnapster1522  One shot them, and "there were no treat"? 😂 Russian shills are everyday funnier.
    1
  48. Everything was fine until the first floor.
    1
  49. How many Ukrainian refugees did UK accept?
    1
  50. Yeah, it's not like half of the navies of the word use Italian (OTO-Melara) guns, or like the German Leo 2 tank is a commercial success.
    1