Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Russia-Ukraine War: France u0026 Italy Reportedly Sent Deadly MILAN Anti-Tank Missile Systems To Kyiv" video.

  1. Several dozen launchers. The ratio is usually around 25 missiles for launcher.
    11
  2.  @paulstone9667  As stated in the clip, the number was at the start of March, so at two weeks from the invasion and more than a month ago. As for putting hands in pocket, the Italian government gave Ukraine 110 million Euros cash already on February 26 to spend for whatever they wanted. When a government gives away weapons it manufactures instead, it was really financing his own industries.
    10
  3. Several dozen launchers. The ratio is usually 25 missiles for launcher, and the given number was for the beginning of March, so when the war just started.
    4
  4. 😂😂If this war demonstrated something, is that the Russian army is a joke.
    4
  5. Yeah. "sorry, we are too busy with our own problems to fight nazism now. Next time maybe". Interesting then the link you estabilished between "only thinks about getting rich" with giving Ukraine weapons to defend themselves for free. Like you have to use a slogan that seemed good for any season. BTW, I'm Italian too, but that's the reason I prefer to never attend Italian comment sections. The sheer amount of empty populism is too much to bear.
    3
  6.  @Administrator0101  Come dovrebbe fare un governo a "diventare ricco" cedendo armi gratuitamente quindi? Lascia perdere. Pensa agli aeroplanini del tuo profilo, che di economia capisci una sega. BTW, non si può essere un "ex veterano" (nel tuo caso poi vabbè, avrai 16 anni al massimo...).
    3
  7.  @urbandream7051  Apart that "impossible" is a pretty long word. They dont' need actually. 1) Recaptured Kherson, the connection would be lost anyway, since the Crimean Isthmus would be at shelling distance. All the struggle for Mariupol would have been for nothing. 2) The port of Sevastopol is at anti-ship missile range from Odessa. It only needs for Ukraine to obtain those missiles to lock the Russian Black Sea Fleet in port. A worse strategical situation than before the war started.
    3
  8.  @urbandream7051  Nothing is "easy", but it's feasible. Russians failed to take Mikolaiv and are losing positions in the area. The frontline is actually only 10 miles from the city. Because Ukraine is not "under attack"? Russians already tried, and failed, to reach Odessa.
    3
  9.  @urbandream7051  Number of "flag ships"? There is ONE flagship for fleet. The Moskva would be, with the General Belgrano, the biggest warship sunk in action since WWII.
    3
  10.  @paulstone9667  NLAW is short range only. 800m max vs. static targets, more 400m max vs. moving ones. It's also an exclusively AT weapon. It requires a magnetic mass to detonate. It's good for ambushes in the wooden terrain of northern Ukraine, much less for the open fields of Donbass. MILAN is longer range, 2000m originally, 3000m extended range. You have to stay in visual contact, but the distance makes you safer. You can also fire TO buildings, helicopters and any kind of cover. Can't do that with NLAW. MILAN-2 has also a thermal image system. NLAW is blind at night. Italy is phasing out the MILAN, but the replacement is a combination of Spike for long range and Panzerfaust-3 for short range.
    2
  11. Several dozen launchers. The ratio is usually 25 missiles for launcher, and the given number was for the beginning of March, so when the war just started.
    2
  12.  @urbandream7051  Are you jocking? Youtube has a function for searching. Post 'Mycolaiv' there and you'll see every kind of reports directly from the city.
    2
  13. It's not some kind of military secret. Journalists are not obliged to keep secrets that are being kept only for internal political reasons.
    2
  14.  @zainiabdullah621  Yeah, yeah. Allah Snackbar.
    2
  15. Ohhh! 1000! After 45 days of siege. 1000! Russian army is suffering like 500 KIA a day.
    1
  16. How many Ukrainian refugees did UK accept?
    1
  17.  @paulstone9667  BTW, how many Ukrainian refugees UK welcomed? Yeah, when the war is over the west wants to see who who is a worthwhile ally and who just wanted to finance its own industry.
    1
  18.  @danielwhyatt3278  For example by welcoming Ukrainian refugees, a thing France, Italy and Germany are doing and UK is not? The idea is "we give you the weapons we manufacture (so we finance our own industry) but your families suck, so they have to stay there, dying with you"? That's not a shame to you? I know allowing civilians to survive war is not as spectacular as blowing up tanks, but...
    1
  19.  @jamesorsby7553  To buy weapons? Do you think that the Bayraktars are for free? To pay for intelligence? Do you think that spies, double agents and informants work for free?
    1
  20.  @jamesorsby7553  I never heard them complaining about money. I heard them sincerely thanking infact. And now who sent money is being demonized? On what basis? Do you know a substitute for money? Have you some source about Ukrainians not wanting them?
    1
  21.  @jamesorsby7553  You said that money was good for nothing. Again. When a country send weapons it manufactures, IT'S FINANCING ITS OWN INDUSTRY. Obviously the Ukraininas need them. But let's not exagerate the effort. To give Raytheon & Lockheed Martin 10 million $ for the Javelins is no different than giving the same money as subsidies to GM or the coal sector.
    1
  22.  @jamesorsby7553  Again, those are money transfered from the pockets of American taxpayers to those of American companies. It's obvious that Ukrainians need those weapons but, financially, they are no more than one of many subsidies the US government gives to US industries.
    1
  23.  @davidweir8312  I didn't say that a crew can carry 25 missiles, but that the ratio missiles provided for launcher provided is 25/1. The two man crew is supposed to take the launcher back and reload. Many weapons work like that. They are not supposed to be left on the field when out of ammos.
    1
  24. Several dozen launchers. The ratio is usually 25 missiles for launcher, and the given number was for the beginning of March, so when the war just started.
    1
  25. Several dozen launchers. The ratio is usually 25 missiles for launcher, and the given number was for the beginning of March, so when the war just started. Apart for the single use Javelins, and the domestically made Stugna-P and the residual Skif they don't have many medium range portable AT system actually. NLAW, Panzerfaust-3, AT4... are short range only, not well suited for Donbass.
    1
  26. Yeah. Bow like slaves. They have other ideas. Thanks.
    1
  27. So the Russians thought they were paying to have free hand to invade, kill and torture Ukrainians? Sorry to burst your buble.
    1