Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "World of Antiquity" channel.

  1. I want my fake archaeology to come with fake science. Why should I not have the whole experience?
    2
  2. I would contest the fact that the disk had been made by a "skilled craftsman". It's made of fine clay, yes, and the stamps had been made by a skilled craftsman. But the disk in itself is barely round. The spiral lines seems to have been made by a child, and the spacing between the signs is irregular, with them sometimes touching each-other or the lines. Having the stamps, anyone could have done better at first attempt with a little attention. It seems to have been made really in haste, or, again, by a child that only wanted to try the stamps.
    1
  3. On the Fuente Magna bowl maybe there is a form of writing, but surely is not Sumerian cuneiform. The signs simply don't match.
    1
  4.  @sarah-jaynemcdonald2594  Maybe, or maybe someone tried to replicate a "cuneiform-like" writing having seen some picture without knowing the meaning of the signs. It can be both, since the bowl has no archaeological history.
    1