Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Insider News" channel.

If yelling "taser" before executing someone counts as an excuse, then yelling "nerf gun" should made anyone acquitted, right?
72
@EJ-en5xl As can be clearly seen in the video, when she yelled "taser" the black officer released the suspect and the suspect did nothing else than trying to cover himself with his arms. He was not reaching for anything and posed no immediate treat, yet she shot anyway. Even assuming she really believed to have a taser in hand, she used it simply as a punitive device, a thing that a taser (classified simply as a LESS lethal weapon than a gun) should NEVER be used for.
14
So yelling "taser" before executing someone now counts as a defense, right? Then yelling "nerf gun" should made anyone acquitted.
8
Moms need to teach their kids rto not kill innocent people. That seems a little more important.
2
@SgtJoeSmith What if he transformed into a T-rex and devoured them?
2
@timvangestel3703 Yeah. He had not properly groveled, so he had been lawfully terminated.
2
@themysteryofgodliness6574 Three armed officers vs a skinny unarmed one, and she panicked? How could it be that paramedics never inject air into car crash victims out of stress? Or that firemen never smash people's heads with their axes out of stress? Are they immune to stress, that only seems to affect policemen? The right answer is SHE DIDN'T CARE. As can be clearly seen in the video, when she yelled "taser" the black officer released the suspect and the suspect did nothing else than trying to cover himself with his arms. He was not reaching for anything and posed no immediate treat, yet she shot anyway. Even assuming she really believed to have a taser in hand, she used it simply as a punitive device, a thing that a taser (classified simply as a LESS lethal weapon than a gun) should NEVER be used for. She didn't care of the man and she didn't care what she had in hand. Since the suspect had not licked their boots fast enough, he had to be punished. That's the only thing she cared for.
2
@jm-hb9tl Other what? The only killer there was the cop.
1
@catherinewersal2616 Yeah. Who doesn't grovel well enough will be rightfully terminated.
1
@LightDontShinee Stressful? Three armed officers vs a skinny unarmed one, and she panicked? How could it be that paramedics never inject air into car crash victims out of stress? Or that firemen never smash people's heads with their axes out of stress? Are they immune to stress, that only seems to affect policemen? Statistically "policeman" is not even a dangerous job. It's not even in top 10, and most cops that dies on the job, do it in car accidents.
1
So she's blind? Are cops supposed to shoot to thing they can't see? As can be clearly seen in the video, when she yelled "taser" the black officer released the suspect and the suspect did nothing else than trying to cover himself with his arms DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF HER. SHE COULD CLEARLY SEE HIM. He was not reaching for anything and posed no immediate treat, yet she shot anyway. Even assuming she really believed to have a taser in hand, she used it simply as a punitive device, a thing that a taser (classified simply as a LESS lethal weapon than a gun) should NEVER be used for. The incident happened simply because SHE DIDN'T CARE what she had in her hands and what could happen to the suspect. He had not licked their boots fast enough, and he had to be punished on the spot.
1
@philiplambiase6298 just about everything you wrote is subjective and an opinion, welcome to the world. Tasers are classified as "less (but still) letal weapons". They are not cattle prod not punitive devices to obtain compliance from citizens. Cops are supposed to react to real treats, not to projected ones. All they saw is recorded and visible by anyone. There were no signs of "4000 lb machine be used as a weapon". See, I think that obedience to everything the autority command is your primary objective in life, and you can't even think that the autority you worship can do something wrong. If someone died, it must be his or everyone else's fault, but not of a cop or of a representative of the autority. See, you can't have a civilized society if autorities are free to do everything they want to citizens. If you have a issue with unarmed citizens, you fight them in a court room, don't execute them on the streets. Had she cared, she would have recognised what she had in her hands. AFTER she fired her gun instead of her taser she was justifiably concerned for the consequences FOR HERSELF of her lack of care FOR OTHERS. A lot of people are concerned for the consequences of the mistakes they did for lack of care AFTER they did the mistake.
1
@tomlloyd9364 Yeah. Tey'll learn you have to be armed, shoot first, and go for the head.
1
@themysteryofgodliness6574 You seem to not read before replying, or not understanding what you read, instead. I wrote "SHE DIDN'T CARE". Did you understand it this time? I repeat it for you another time SHE DIDN'T CARE. She didnt "woke up that morning and thought..." SHE DIDN'T CARE. It's clear now? He didn't lick her boots fast enough, so he had to be punished. That's all that matter for her. What she had in her hands came FAR later. Adrenaline surge? Three vs. an unarmed skinny one? If you have an adrenaline surge capable to make you unable to discern a taser from a pistol in that situation, you are too emotional to serve even as a librarian. SHE DIDN'T CARE. Now you can go back to not understanding what you read.
1
@themysteryofgodliness6574 You are another loser that think attacking the interlocutor can make up for not having a valid argument. Let me recap the argument you didn't even understand for you, loser. Three armed officers vs a skinny unarmed one, and she panicked? How could it be that paramedics never inject air into car crash victims out of stress? Or that firemen never smash people's heads with their axes out of stress? Are they immune to stress, that only seems to affect policemen? The right answer is SHE DIDN'T CARE. As can be clearly seen in the video, when she yelled "taser" the black officer released the suspect and the suspect did nothing else than trying to cover himself with his arms. He was not reaching for anything and posed no immediate treat, yet she shot anyway. Even assuming she really believed to have a taser in hand, she used it simply as a punitive device, a thing that a taser (classified simply as a LESS lethal weapon than a gun) should NEVER be used for. She didn't care of the man and she didn't care what she had in hand. Since the suspect had not licked their boots fast enough, he had to be punished. That's the only thing she cared for.
1
@themysteryofgodliness6574 Still attacking the interlocurtor instead of trying to reply to the argument I see.
1
@themysteryofgodliness6574 Your attacks ad hominem posted instead of replying to the argument are in your posts, loser. Let me recap the argument you didn't even understand for you. Three armed officers vs a skinny unarmed one, and she panicked? How could it be that paramedics never inject air into car crash victims out of stress? Or that firemen never smash people's heads with their axes out of stress? Are they immune to stress, that only seems to affect policemen? The right answer is SHE DIDN'T CARE. As can be clearly seen in the video, when she yelled "taser" the black officer released the suspect and the suspect did nothing else than trying to cover himself with his arms. He was not reaching for anything and posed no immediate treat, yet she shot anyway. Even assuming she really believed to have a taser in hand, she used it simply as a punitive device, a thing that a taser (classified simply as a LESS lethal weapon than a gun) should NEVER be used for. She didn't care of the man and she didn't care what she had in hand. Since the suspect had not licked their boots fast enough, he had to be punished. That's the only thing she cared for.
1