Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Italian Armor VS German Armor. Which One Is Better?" video.
-
8
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
@undertakernumberone1 The fact that there's a gorget doesn't mean you want to be hit there anyway. Neck is a weak spot of human body. Full of important things and not very apt to take hits.
You claimed fluting was advantageous. Here's a simple point: had fluting been SO advantageous as you CLAIM... it would've replaced flat armor extremely quickly because the knights would've noticed: "hey, since we put that stuff on our armour, far less of us die!". Instead fluted armor had been fashionable for a certain perod in a certain place, and then abandoned, while flat armors went on until napoleonic era (and not for fashion. Napoleonic curiasses could still protect from projectiles). People weren't stupid. Yes, they adopted it because it fit the fashion, but then they noticed it was not worth it.
You can weld the fluting to the armor if it's advantageous.
Maces and the likes are better faced by a continually curved surface than a fluted one. That's why modern motorcycle helmets are not fluted.
Physics doesn't change, The shot trap issue is with shots being "trapped", by the shape of the vehicle, in hitting a certain part of the vehicle 90° instead of glancing off.
The fact that there's a gorget doesn't mean you want to be hit there anyway. Neck is a weak spot of human body. Full of important things and not very apt to take hits.
So those versions have a shot trap, to have the full force of the hit discharged where the vertical fluting encounters the orizontal one. Better than the hit reaching the throat, but far from ideal anyway.
Infact those are NOT shot traps. Projectiles are meant to penetrate that external "armour".
1
-
1