Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Is the Shroud of Turin Real?" video.

@danytalloen Not only the linen, but also the image surely existed one hundred years before the birth of Leonardo. There 's no trace of those chemical compounds in the shroud, and it couldn't have been washed after the process, because the blood was there before the image.
1
@zombiedoggie2732 It was not uncommon for a Jew to have long hair. "naziroi" specifically made a vow to not cut hair and beard.
1
@druidriley3163 Garlaschelli didn't manage to replicate the shroud. He first made an image very similar to that of the shroud using dry ochre powder, but there's no ochre, or other pigment, in the shroud, and an image made with ochre powder, or any other dry pigment, wouldn't have survived until now. Then he tried to replicate the process mixing solid acids and salts to the ochre , cooking the linen and then washing it. The final result had all the defects of hundreds of other contact images made ro replicate the shroud. The discoloration was much deeper, there were not the half-tones present in both the shroud and the first replica, and there was no colour at all in non-contact area. Moreover, in the shroud there is no image where there is the blood, so first blood, then image. In Garlaschelli's second replica, since the cloth had to be washed, the blood can be added only after the image had been formed and the cloth washed.
1
@druidriley3163 Garlaschelli didn't replicate the shroud. He first made an image very similar to that of the shroud using dry ochre powder, but there's no ochre, or other pigment, in the shroud, and an image made with ochre powder, or any other dry pigment, wouldn't have survived until now. Then he tried to replicate the process mixing solid acids and salts to the ochre , cooking the linen and then washing it. The final result had all the defects of hundreds of other contact images made ro replicate the shroud. The discoloration was much deeper, there were not the half-tones present in both the shroud and the first replica, and there was no colour at all in non-contact area. Moreover, in the shroud there is no image where there is the blood, so first blood, then image. In Garlaschelli's second replica, since the cloth had to be washed, the blood can be added only after the image had been formed and the cloth washed.
1
@revedargent3467 That of McCrone was the opinion of a single scientist. However he currently "is" nothing, since he died in 2002 and more than 20 years of studies accumulated since then. You can "reproduce" whatever you want, but not with the same charateristics. You can make a watercolor visually identical to the Sistine Chapel fresco, but it will always be a watercolor, not a fresco. The charateristics of the Turin Shroud had never been reproduced until now. So in the blood stains there are elements that commonly come from blood. What a surprise. The same elements can be found in other things. What a surprise. Anbd so? Too bad for the geneticist Gérard Lucotte.
1
You do know those anagrams exist only in English, and that English is not some sort of "universal language" whose anagrams validate or unvalidate items, right?
1
@ashzole Other insane rants?
1
@ashzole Still ranting after five months I see. It must have been painful to have been shown what you are.
1
The Church never claimed the Shroud to be "legit", nor it to be "miracolous". Nor did for any spear that wounded Christ. As for the Church the Shroud is an icon of the passion of Christ. It doesn't count when or how it had been made.
1
@druidriley3163 Garlaschelli didn't manage to replicate the shroud. He first made an image very similar to that of the shroud using dry ochre powder, but there's no ochre, or other pigment, in the shroud, and an image made with ochre powder, or any other dry pigment, wouldn't have survived until now. Then he tried to replicate the process mixing solid acids and salts to the ochre , cooking the linen and then washing it. The final result had all the defects of hundreds of other contact images made ro replicate the shroud. The discoloration was much deeper, there were not the half-tones present in both the shroud and the first replica, and there was no colour at all in non-contact area. Moreover, in the shroud there is no image where there is the blood, so first blood, then image. In Garlaschelli's second replica, since the cloth had to be washed, the blood can be added only after the image had been formed and the cloth washed.
1
@druidriley3163 It can, and it has to be explained how the image of Samir the camel seller ended up there.
1
@druidriley3163 I didn't ask for the circumstances of his death, but how his image ended up there.
1
@druidriley3163 We know it's not paint and a lying corpse can hold his hands in front of his groin, provided he has no space to spread the elbows. So, how did his image end up there?
1