Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "BFBS Forces News" channel.

  1. Brits reviewing food? Is some sort of joke?
    203
  2.  @EmperorLionflame  ;-D
    7
  3. Incendiary weapons are allowed against enemy combatants.
    5
  4. Incendiary weapons are allowed against enemy combatants.
    5
  5. It's evidently not a weapon of mass destruction (it's more accurate than an aerial bomb) and the use of incendiary devices on the frontline is allowed. The use on civilians is already banned. Mind that's simply a substitute for napalm that would be more effective (since it fills trenches and foxholes of burning liquid. Napalm is the end of trench warfare), but requires quantities out of the possibilities of a drone.
    5
  6. Small fignts? In the Kerson Oblast 1184 square kms, 1/5 of the occupied area west of the Dnepr, had been liberated in the last four days.
    4
  7. No, Russia doesn't have them.
    3
  8. Why?
    3
  9. Russia is fighting against a third-tier European power with some borrowed, not too complex, weapon.
    2
  10.  @DownUnderDigitals  "unless they are being used to conceal combatants or other military objectives, or are themselves military objectives." You can burn down any forest if it's used to conceal soldiers.
    2
  11.  @doreencardwell8008  Russia ALREADY used incendiary weapons against civilians, one of their many war crimes. Under what rock where you then, jerking while thinking about Putin? Instead rule 85 of the ICRC states that incendiary weapons are allowed against enemy combatants. Protocol III to the "Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons which may be deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to have Indiscriminate Effects" states that the use of incendiary weapons is allowed on forests or other kinds of plant cover when such natural elements are used to cover, conceal or camouflage combatants or other military objectives, or are themselves military objectives. It's a sick mindset to mistake those who follow the rules of war with those that commit war crimes daily. But Russians and their sympathizers are sick by default.
    2
  12.  @redrick8900  Don't you know? Licking Kim Jong Un's boots to have some artillery shell makes you a superpower.
    1
  13. They are former Italian Army Leo I that RUAG purchased some time ago. Some years ago Italy alone could have provided Ukraine with over 700 decommissioned Leo I that were in long term storage at Lenta, but almost all of them had been sold or scrapped before the start of the war.
    1
  14.  @sammiemakki9339  Or YOU don't know how to read, or you are intentionally misquoting. "unless they are being used to conceal combatants or other military objectives, or are themselves military objectives." You can burn down any forest if it's used to conceal enemy soldiers or materials.
    1
  15. "unless they are being used to conceal combatants or other military objectives, or are themselves military objectives." You can burn down any forest if it's used to conceal soldiers.
    1