Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "UATV English" channel.

  1. Russian Intelligence is an oxymoron.
    65
  2. It's refreshing to see that in Russia everything always goes according to plans.
    28
  3. Weren't the Europeans the ones supposed to freeze this winter?
    17
  4. It's actually not an MG3, but a Beretta MG42/59. It's recognisable by the muzzle booster.
    16
  5. He's staying.
    15
  6.  @gazpachopolice7211  Iranans had been protesting for more than two months with hundreds of deads and thousands of arrests. And not because their relatives had been sent to fertilize Ukrainian soil.
    11
  7. "I've the number of someone that can get you out of there. Get the hell out!" "there are only 5 of us left, maybe we'll be dismissed". People should really learn how probability works.
    10
  8. Had they been paid, everything would have been fine for them.
    9
  9. Your beloved ones are not supposed to live enough to need all those things.
    9
  10. It's like showing the winner of the lottery to persuade people to buy tickets. He survived, yahoo! Join Wagner group. It's like playing Russian roulette with five loaded rounds!
    9
  11. Has not Somalia made a peace plan for Ukraine? Sudan maybe? Lybia?
    8
  12. Many armies used them in WWI, but already then, soldiers sewed socks out of them, or made people at home send them socks. Their advantage (other than being cheaper) as said, is that they dry faster (out of the boot). They also last more, since socks wear always in the same spots.
    8
  13. They can write, but he'll not read.
    8
  14. It's not an MG3, but a Beretta MG42/59. It's recognisable by the muzzle booster. Notice also the difference between the clean Ukrainian dormitory and the pigstyes the Russian soldiers sleep in.
    7
  15. The statement is actually correct, even if modified by the translation. Faking a surrender is a war crime. It's an example ("The feigning of an intent to negotiate under a flag of truce or of a surrender") specifically listed in the Geneva conventions under the definition of "perfidy". "Acts inviting the confidence of an adversary to lead him to believe that he is entitled to, or is obliged to accord, protection under the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, with intent to betray that confidence." Betraying the confidence is indeed treachery, by definition.
    5
  16. Russian mechanics are not THAT idiot. It's real the tanks had been stored improperly. Mostly simply left in the open for years, but they know how to reactivate them. Simply they had been given a schedule. They have to deliver a certain number of tanks in a given time, regardless how much it really needs to make them functional. So tanks that "more or less work" are sent on the frontline, even if the conditions are so precarious that they broke down during transport, or just after few hours of use.
    4
  17. Hey! He said everything is going to be fine, and they'll break through someway. Who wouldn't be inspired by that?
    4
  18. Russian government should forbid to those abroad to work remotely for Russian companies. The economy of the country needs to be hit a little more.
    4
  19. Those weren't widows. As explained by one of them, they were routinely hired from factories to film those stunts.
    3
  20. The wonder is that those relatives still adress the governors of the Russian regions like they care.
    3
  21. Did some of those relatives of servicemen proudly sported a "Z" on their cars when Russians were torturing and executing Ukrainians? Then that's exactly what you rooted for.
    3
  22. The Samp-T delivered to Ukraine are Italian only.
    3
  23. Those Afghan "commandos" performed poorly even when they had everything in their favour. Figures when they'll be sent forward as cannon fodder by the Russians.
    3
  24. Ceasefires have to be agreed with the other party, not simply announced less than 24 hours before the supposed start, like the other army have nothing better to do that follow your schedule.
    3
  25. Who wouldn't volunteer seeing the sole survivor of an entire unit wiped out by artillery fire?
    3
  26. A winter in the trenches will be healty for the Russian conscripts.
    3
  27. @Coast Line Russians had been retreating for 8 months straight. Sweden and Finland will join NATO. Russian Army had been exposed for being a bluff and is now the buttmonkey of the world. 100.000 Russian soldiers lost their life in Ulraine, at least double that number had been wounded. Russia had not been invaded, but 900.000 Russians left the country to avoid mobilization, and those were the one that could afford that, the most educated and productive part of the population. Russian GDP is estimated to drop 9% in the two years 2022-2023. In 2022 only 5 countries in the world experienced a fall in GDP. Russia is one of them (Belarus another), only thanks to the idiocy of the Russians. All of that for trying, and failing, to bully a smaller country without any other reason that showing a strenght they only pretend to have. Russian Intelligence is an oxymoron.
    3
  28. @Coast Line Yeah, yeah... "all the military experts" Putin's bootlickers are allowed to know. 🤣
    3
  29. @Coast Line If you listen other than your beloved Russian propaganda sites don't state "all the military experts said Ukraine has already lost". Your very personal guessings have nothing to do with "all the military experts".
    3
  30. "I'm stuck in first line forever and convicts are in second line for six months before being released. The next elections I'm going to vote against Putin!" "There are 5 of us left, maybe we'll be dismissed."
    2
  31. OR, they can unfroze the money, lift the sanctions and have cheap gas and business as before. If "the EU has zero scruples", why all the burden of aiding Ukraine in first place? Maybe you can do better than them.
    2
  32. This is a translation. In Ukrainian there's no difference between treachery and treason. The statement is actually correct. Faking a surrender is a war crime. It's an example ("The feigning of an intent to negotiate under a flag of truce or of a surrender") specifically listed in the Geneva conventions under the definition of "perfidy". "Acts inviting the confidence of an adversary to lead him to believe that he is entitled to, or is obliged to accord, protection under the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, with intent to betray that confidence." Betraying the confidence is indeed treachery, by definition.
    2
  33. Law is law. Feigning a surrender is a war crime specifically listed in the Geneva conventions. If one, like the Russian soldier in the video, comes out shooting, then the whole enemy unit is supposed to have feigned surrender and set up an ambush. You are no more keeping prisoners. You are in battle, and in battle you don't look for which enemy is shooting at you and which one hasn't started yet. At that point you have to look EXCLUSIVELY at the safety of YOUR unit. Especially since the "surrendered" had not yet been searched. Fighting enemies are shot at. It's not like they're playing paintball. If there had been, there, on the ground, with the machine gun, keeping the "surrendered" at gunpoint, a NATO soldier, professional and perfectly educated on international war conventions, at the very moment when the Russian had come out firing, I expect he would have pulled the trigger, only to release it in one of the following two cases: 1) when he was sure that none of the enemies could move anymore. 2) because the belt had ended.
    2
  34. Yeah. We did all see Russians looting.
    2
  35. Provided they still work. NATO's ones work for sure, their anti-missile defenses work too, and their stealth bombers are REALLY stealth.
    2
  36. Feigning a surrender is a war crime.
    2
  37.  @1mcg1  He didn't "fought back", since none was shooting at him. He begun shooting after his unit feigned a surrender, and that's a war crime. If one, like the Russian soldier in the video, comes out shooting, then the whole enemy unit is supposed to have feigned surrender and set up an ambush. You are in battle, and in battle you don't look for which enemy is shooting at you and which one hasn't started yet. At that point soldiers have to look exclusively at the safety of themself and their comrades. Especially since the "surrendered" had not yet been searched. The location of the wounds is your guessing.
    2
  38. So the wife recognised the guy and made so that he was put on an exchange list, so that he could return to the Russian Army and be sent to the frontline again? I'm not for beating wives, but...
    2
  39. Better there than in Russia.
    2
  40. If one, like the Russian soldier in the video, comes out shooting, then the whole enemy unit is supposed to have feigned surrender and set up an ambush. You are in battle, and It's not like in battle you're looking for which enemy is shooting at you and which one hasn't started yet. At that point you have to look solely at the safety of YOUR unit. Especially since the "surrendered" had not yet been searched. Fighting enemies are shot at. It's not like they're playing paintball. If there had been, there, on the ground, with the machine gun, keeping the "surrendered" at gunpoint, a NATO soldier, professional and perfectly educated on international war conventions, at the very moment when the Russian had come out firing, I expect he would have pulled the trigger, only to release it in one of the following two cases: 1) when he was sure that none of the enemies could move anymore. 2) because the belt had ended.
    2
  41.  @lxathu  That requires some link between the robbing parties and logistic, and a working logistic. If logistic doesn't work , then soldiers would remain without coal in Wyoming.
    2
  42.  @stevensteven3417  It's called an invasion by a gang of criminals and resistance.
    2
  43.  @changeshifter4852  "should not be allowed" by who? It's Ukrainian money? No, so what are they "delaying"? You can help Ukrainians more than the EU. Have you a pair of dozens billions/year to give them? Then what are you arguing about?
    1
  44.  @changeshifter4852  "Only"? I would be grateful that the EU froze that money in first place, BECAUSE NONE FORCED THEM and, if the EU decides to give a single cent of that money to Ukraine, IT'S A GIFT, NOT A DUE. Let's be clear. IT'S NOT UKRAINIAN MONEY. It's money that the EU can decide to give Ukraine, in part or all, OR NOT and, to give it, even in part, many EU countries have to force their legislations, because they are functional democracies, where judiciary is an indipendent power, and governments can't decide of other's properties at will. So let's start to not pretend to be outraged because the EU is deciding to give some dozen billions/year to Ukraine.
    1
  45.  @changeshifter4852  I'm not really sorry if this angers you, because it seems you are doing anything you can to be angered. "changing the deal"? "profiting"? The only deals that had been changed are those with Russia, because it's Russian money that had been frozen, the only one that's talking of the EU council "profiting" of the seized money is you, and those money had NOT being frozen saying they would have been given to Ukraine as they are. If you imagined that, it's nobody else's fault. I already explained you that those countries are functional democracies, where judiciary is an indipendent power, and governments can't decide of other's properties at will. If you, as it seems, are not able to understand how a democracy with an indipendent judiciary works, there's nothing I can do for you. I can only advise you to take some lesson of civics before talking of these arguments.
    1
  46. Russia has nothing socialist.
    1
  47. Pre-2014 borders. Ukraine can apply for membership of whatever organization it wants. War criminals handed to the Hague court. That's the base of the negotiation. The rest is negotiable.
    1
  48. Already at the time I said they were among the worst troops in the world (compared to them, even the Russians seemed competent), and the conditions in Ukraine would have made them perform even worse. Same for the Afghan "commandos". They performed poorly when they had everything in their favour. Figures when they'll be sent forward as cannon fodder by the Russians.
    1
  49. To individually surrender is not that easy. You are in a unit of people that see what you are doing. Even if you manage to slip away unnoticed, lines are usually not that close, and you don't know exactly the location of the enemy, so there are high chances to be killed while walking to the enemy lines.
    1
  50. If one, like the Russian soldier in the video, comes out shooting, then the whole enemy unit is supposed to have feigned surrender and set up an ambush. You are in battle, and It's not like in battle you're looking for which enemy is shooting at you and which one hasn't started yet. At that point you have to look solely at the safety of YOUR unit. Especially since the "surrendered" had not yet been searched. Fighting enemies are shot at. It's not like they're playing paintball. If there had been, there, on the ground, with the machine gun, keeping the "surrendered" at gunpoint, a NATO soldier, professional and perfectly educated on international war conventions, at the very moment when the Russian had come out firing, I expect he would have pulled the trigger, only to release it in one of the following two cases: 1) when he was sure that none of the enemies could move anymore. 2) because the belt had ended.
    1