Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Frozen Russian assets as punishment for war crimes: funds for compensation damage to Ukraine" video.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
@changeshifter4852 "Only"?
I would be grateful that the EU froze that money in first place, BECAUSE NONE FORCED THEM and, if the EU decides to give a single cent of that money to Ukraine, IT'S A GIFT, NOT A DUE.
Let's be clear. IT'S NOT UKRAINIAN MONEY. It's money that the EU can decide to give Ukraine, in part or all, OR NOT and, to give it, even in part, many EU countries have to force their legislations, because they are functional democracies, where judiciary is an indipendent power, and governments can't decide of other's properties at will.
So let's start to not pretend to be outraged because the EU is deciding to give some dozen billions/year to Ukraine.
1
-
@changeshifter4852 I'm not really sorry if this angers you, because it seems you are doing anything you can to be angered. "changing the deal"? "profiting"?
The only deals that had been changed are those with Russia, because it's Russian money that had been frozen, the only one that's talking of the EU council "profiting" of the seized money is you, and those money had NOT being frozen saying they would have been given to Ukraine as they are. If you imagined that, it's nobody else's fault.
I already explained you that those countries are functional democracies, where judiciary is an indipendent power, and governments can't decide of other's properties at will. If you, as it seems, are not able to understand how a democracy with an indipendent judiciary works, there's nothing I can do for you. I can only advise you to take some lesson of civics before talking of these arguments.
1
-
1
-
1