Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Brexit: Good news for British farmers? • FRANCE 24 English" video.

The French "wanted to supply the apples"? You mean, they were willing to sell their goods? How shameful! Had the UK consumers given a damn about North Essex apples, they would simply have kept on buying them.
13
Leroy Jenkins v3.0 That translates to "We let British consumers to buy what they wanted to buy for far too long. Now we have finally forced them to buy what I like."
6
many talks about chlorinated chikens, but under EU food standards, US milk is toxic waste.
5
Leroy Jenkins v3.0 UK products were subsided the same way, so it was a level playing field and British consumers could buy what they wanted. But if you mean that, now, far cheaper world products are going to invade UK shelves and kick the UK farmers out of the market, that's exactly what is going to happen.
5
@PeterWoodstorrechianca None banned you to grow anything. If the UK consumers didn't buy them it's because they were not interested in them.
5
@Mark O'nee 1 Not exactly. They had that before. None ever prevented them to buy British. Now they have ONLY that. Wanting or not. No other possibilities.
4
@Mark O'nee 1 The effect will be 8% in the extreme assumption that all the shipment from UK to Rotterdam is then exported out of the EU. More realistically is below 2% and, again, it only has a STATISTICAL significance. To bring it up talking about "level field" means not knowing what you are talking about or being in bad faith from the start. Sorry, but running a youtube channel is not a guarantee of anything, as you clearly demonstrate. Other ways to avoid the topic?
2
@Mark O'nee 1 Oh, please. You managed to distort what's a mith from the start. The "Rotterdam effect" has only a STATISTICAL significance. It doesn't affect trade in any way. And the real extent of the effect is debated, it goes from "minimal" to "insignificant".
1
@Mark O'nee 1 8% is the value of the Rotterdam effect in the extreme assumption that all the shipment from UK to Rotterdam is then exported out of the EU (and has nothing to do with the "Netherland Distortion", that's another STATISTICAL effect, on investments this time). More realistically is below 2% and, again, it only has a STATISTICAL significance. To bring it up talking about "level field", again, means not knowing what you are talking about or being in bad faith from the start. So you brought another false argument to not talk about the real topic here. Have you other ways to avoid the topic?
1