Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Українська правда" channel.

  1. When in the Russian army, you are on your own.
    107
  2.  @domb1249  In US, or any other western army, none is left behind.
    17
  3. It's not stealing. It's a special acquisition operation.
    15
  4. For a comparison, from 6000m distance, on a 155mm western field gun 50 percent of the rounds are expected to impact within 15 meters (over and short) of the mean range line, 82 percent will impact within 30 meters (over and short), 96 percent will impact within 45-meters (over and short), and 100 percent will impact within 60 meters.
    8
  5. They could have written "kill zone" on that parallel road, and the Russians would have fallen for it anyway.
    6
  6. "The Russians came and left this garbage on my field. I have to work here!"
    4
  7. I bet they are not going to spread the news.
    4
  8. Because Russians.
    3
  9. ​ @marialoshkova6857  There is NO sign it's humanitarian. All the vehicles are marked as part of an invasion force (otherwise they'll be shot by their Russian comrades, always eager to shoot on civilians) and all of the occupants you can see are armed soldiers. There is NO civilian anywere to be seen. Supply convoys are not "humanitarian", and are a legit target. Bucha is ALL on the count of the Russians. No need to pity for them sorry. To get rid of them, at this point, is pest control.
    3
  10.  @Светлана-щ7ц8л  So the soldiers left behind were really bad? Those were the circumstances? It was not like a sniper was targetting them. It was an artillery barrage. You take the wounded soldier on your shoulders and run. No excuses. In real armies soldiers are trained that the other men in their unit are more than their brothers. You don't leave your brother agonizing on the ground. Those were just cowards. Without discipline, whitout training. Just chickens in front of a fox.
    3
  11.  @user-dr6bu2dx7n  он не русский
    2
  12. They could have written "kill zone" on that parallel road, and the Russians would have fallen for it anyway.
    1
  13.  @domb1249  Oh, so the soldiers we see here are tens of kms behind the enemy lines, where none can see them? Or are they just in plain view of their supposed comrades? Still supposing you are able to grasp the difference, stop clutching at straws, please. BTW, in the 2003 Iraqi war the US had a total of 7 war prisoners. Stop taking your infos from Russian media.
    1
  14.  @domb1249  So you hare not able to grasp the difference, nor to do researches. Not surprising for someone brainwashed by Russian propaganda.
    1
  15. A shame that your narrative is disproved by this very same clip.
    1
  16. The civilians you are inventing?
    1
  17.  @diamondphoenix2544  😂😂"Not military" in uniform and AKs? 😂😂
    1
  18. Civilians in Russian uniforms and armed with AKs? Try "Russian looters".
    1
  19. 30mm vs infantry. They made minced meat.
    1
  20.  @marialoshkova6857  Because the Russian fascists market those vehicles with their mark, and you can see only Russian fascists in the clip. So, if you desperately want to say there was any other kind of occupant in those vehicles, you have to invent.
    1
  21. It's not a mistery Russians lack transport vehicles, and loot.
    1
  22.  @milanstanic2525  Maybe is not Mariupol, so?
    1
  23. Because they are inepts and cowards.
    1