Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Hindustan Times" channel.

  1. You have to win to dictate conditions. 1. Russia retires into internationally recognised borders. 2. Ukraine can apply for membership of any international organization it wants. 3. War criminals handed to the Hague court. Then they can discuss about war reparations.
    7
  2. "assassins"? The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    6
  3. "Two Italian Marines who killed two indian fishermen"? The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    5
  4.  @niks17  The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    4
  5. The alleged incident happened in international waters, so, for international laws, soldiers in service had to be trialed in their own country. Other than that, there was no evidence of them having done anything, and strong evidences against it.
    4
  6. Add that, by not allowing the defense's experts to assist to the ballistic tests, the Kerala court discredited any result they provided. That's why the two couldn't be trialed in an Italian court, as, at that point there were no evidencies against them.
    3
  7. Well, yes, but maybe not in the sense you think. The Kerala court screwed the case the moment tey didn't allow to the defense's experts to assist to the ballistic tests. That's why the two couldn't be trialed in an Italian court, as, at that point, there were no evidencies against them. You don't make so that the forensics are prohibited to the experts of the defense if you don't want to forge them.
    3
  8. You know what "international waters" means? India should declare they would dictate who can and cannot bear arms in international waters? If you want the Indian Navy to be blown up to the moon, that's the way to obtain it.
    3
  9. I'm sure they'll be pretty good with their karma, since the same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.45mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible with the findings is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    2
  10. It's a way to say "no evidences at all". The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    2
  11. It's more than physics doesn't change with ethnicity. A 5.56mm NATO bullet shot by an European soldier doesn't become a 7,62x54R one when it enters in a Indian body. The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    1
  12. US imported half a million test kits from Italy, half a million from China and half a million from Turkey. Did they improved when they passed the border?
    1
  13. What's wrong is to declare that "they murdered" without actual evidencies. The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    1
  14. Since "Putin's army" had lost grond for 8 straignt months until now...
    1
  15. Actually, by not allowing the defense's experts to assist to the ballistic tests, the Kerala court discredited any result they provided. That's why the two couldn't be trialed in an Italian court, as, at that point, there were no evidencies against them. You don't make so that the forensics are prohibited to the experts of the defense if you don't want to forge them. So yes, Indian law and defence should learn from this. Co-operate with foreign countries instead of searching scapegoats and hindering their defense to seem "though".
    1
  16. Maybe the American court would have seeked the truth instead of two scapegoats. The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters. The marines couldn't be prosecuted in Italy because, by not allowing to the defense technicians to assist to the ballistic tests, the Kerala court discredited any possible evidence, so it would have been a trial without any proof. You don't make so that the forensics are prohibited to the experts of the defense if you don't want to forge them.
    1
  17.  @papagin  😂😂"lost the war". 😂😂 You are a comedian!
    1
  18. You don't have to prove innocence, you have to prove guilt. By not allowing the defense's experts to assist to the ballistic tests, the Kerala court discredited any result they provided. That's why the two couldn't be trialed in an Italian court, as, at that point, there were no evidencies against them. You don't make so that the forensics are prohibited to the experts of the defense if you don't want to forge them.
    1
  19.  @HEMI345S  But they work. Like almost everything Russian, Krasnopol ammos are usually defective, so much that India, after having tested them, ended up buying Excalibur rounds.
    1
  20. The marines couldn't be prosecuted because, by not allowing to the defense technicians to assist to the autopsy and the ballistic tests, the Indian court discredited any possible evidence, so it would have been a trial without any proof. You don't make so that the forensics are prohibited to the experts of the defense if you don't want to forge them.
    1
  21. Had it been Italians, maybe the Italian justice would have searched for the real culprits. The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    1
  22. He said he played waterpolo for 25 years.
    1
  23. I'm sure they'll be pretty good with their karma, since the same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    1
  24. The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    1
  25.  @Antikammi  It would have not been the first time.
    1
  26. Maybe in that case the Italian court would have searched for the culprits instead of two scapegoats. The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    1
  27. Indian judiciary needed to be slapped. By not allowing the defense's experts to assist to the ballistic tests, the Kerala court discredited any result they provided. That's why the two couldn't be trialed in an Italian court, as, at that point, there were no evidencies against them. You don't make so that the forensics are prohibited to the experts of the defense if you don't want to forge them.
    1
  28. So India's goal should be to have courts like those of Iran, China or Russia? The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters. Moreover, by not allowing the defense's experts to assist to the ballistic tests, the Kerala court discredited any result they provided. That's why the two couldn't be trialed in an Italian court, as, at that point, there were no evidencies against them. You don't make so that the forensics are prohibited to the experts of the defense if you don't want to forge them. So, yes. maybe in a Iranian, Russian or Chinese court the two would have been convicted on the basis of those "proofs". If that's the goal...
    1
  29. And what would have happened if Indian marines DIDN'T kill Italian fishermen? There would have been a mediatic circus in Italy already condemning them without any evidence? The same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    1
  30. There's no evidence because, by not allowing to the defense technicians to assist to the ballistic tests, the Kerala court discredited any possible evidence, so it would have been a trial without any proof. You don't make so that the forensics are prohibited to the experts of the defense if you don't want to forge them. BTW the same Indian autopsy of Prof. K. Sasikala cleared the two marines, the projectiles that killed the two fishermen had "24mm circumference (7.62mm diameter) and 31mm lenght". The italians were armed with weapons in 5.56mm NATO, not compatible with the findings. They didn't have weapons in 7.62 NATO but, even if they had, a 7.62mm NATO projectile is only 28mm long, so not compatible with the findings. The only widely used projectile compatible is that of 7,62x54R cartriges, used, IE, on PK machineguns mounted on Sri Lanka's Arrow boats, normally used to fight illegal fishing in Sri Lanka's waters.
    1