General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

CNN
comments

Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "CNN" channel.

He had seen Zelensky at Kherson, just few Kms form the frontline, and decided to show he too could came some meter out of his bunker for some minute. What a hero.
738
"I share this pain and nothing can replace the loss. That's why you are not going to receive any compensation for the loss of your beloved ones. But I can assure you their bodies will be thrown in the nearest dump with the utmost respect".
182
@djlee3276 So, to you, cops are not supposed to discern guns from tasers? Is a lobotomy part of the training at the Police Academy?
23
@carlfisher6472 So, to you, the Ukranian Army is using "his own citizens as human shields" because the Russian army is utterly unable to conquer towns and resort to terrorist bombings of civilians out of frustration and because they know that buildings can't fight back? LOL! Russian shills become everyday funnier.😂
19
What would they understand? "How can this people be happy without licking the boots of a dictator?"
10
Apparently it is. Has, anyone but a cop, mistaken a gun for a taser and killed someone, he would have been IMMEDIATELY arrested and charged at least for manslaughter within few hours.
8
@ajisbeast1 Yeah, after they kicked out around 1,200,000 Albanians before. Who whould have thought that the attempt to ethnically cleanse the region could backfire?
8
@louissosa1535 Russian shills are everyday funnier. 🤣
8
In any civilised country on Earth to shoot three times a drunk man that was running away by foot would have been considered a murder.
7
Yeah. They employ like 15.000 troops and suffer huge losses for two months to "force to either surrender or starve to death" about 500 enemies. The enemies love the Russian policy of siege too.
6
@ezzyzhoo5139 If the taser is lethal, then why the same cops used it TWICE on a drunk man? Did they want to kill him on the spot?
6
@Baconrips Cops are supposed to react to real treats, not projected ones. "policeman" is not a particularly dangerous job (is not even in the top ten, and most dangers for cops are due to car accidents). For some reason it doesn't happen to paramedics to inject air into car accident victims out of stress, or to firemen to smash people's heads with their axes out of stress.
5
Not even Kursk's citizens really care. There's no grassroots resistance to Ukrainian's advance. Anyone understand that Ukrainians don't really want that territory, but it's only bargain chip for eventual negotiations.
4
They do. Soldiers' cellphones had been seized before the attack and generally their relatives didn't have news from them since Feb. 24. There's an Ukranian line that those Russian relatives can call to have infos.
4
Who said they had not an artistic sense?
4
It takes years from zero to a fighter pilot. To transition from a fighter jet to another, depending on the similarities between the two and the availability of simulator time and twin seater trainers, takes from 1 to 6 months.
4
Notice that his words mean: "Patriot system is old, but we don't currently have anything to counter it".
4
@russianpowerZV The loyalty Russians show for their coward dictator is really moving.
4
The plane landed in southern Russia, where the patient had been treated. Unfortunately he wasnt' dead yet, but the doctors solved the situation.
3
simply "minimal resistance" was all the Russian troops were willing to offer after 75 days of decimation with idiot tactic, poor logistic and no replacements.
3
@THEBUTCHER1911 And missed, because the taser has a max. range of 10 feet and he was farther. At that point the taser was as dangerous as a water gun. So what was the actual danger for the officers?
3
@Baconrips You don't need to guess. What happened, what the cops saw, is all in the camera. After she yelled "taser" he was only covering his head with his arms. There was no immediate treat. Cops are supposed to react to real treats, not projected ones. The REAL situation was a single, skinny, unarmed one vs three fully armed cops, and there was not a single reason to suppose it was otherwise.
3
Not that reassuring dead meat would be of much use anyway.
3
Actually Zelensky made HUGE mistakes at the start of the war. He didn't mobilize, despite the warnings of US and British intelligence, to not seem "aggressive". Had him at least prepared a defence, the south of the country would have been easily defended. There is a grand total of 7 roads linking Crimea to the continent. Five pass over bridges, and the other two are surrounded by marshes. It would have been easy to cut all of them, and keep Kherson, Mikolaiv, Mariupol and the Zaporizhzhia power plant in Ukrainian hands. Even failing to do so, Kherson is linked to the east of the Dnepr by 3 bridges. It only needed to cut them to not lose the city.
3
"it's all going according to plan".
3
On what planet? No more than 50% of the children moved out of London during the Blitz.
3
@alaswanyalaswany3108 LOL! Then NATO is much more efficient than anyone expected. Russian Army, Aviation and Navy are crippled, And NATO had not lost a single soldier, tank, boat or aircraft. 😂
3
@rhysvanwyk9367 "second largest army in Europe?" In 2021 military ranking Ukraine was 25th, and 8th in Europe. The weapons provided to them had mostly been stuff that the donor armies considered outdated and were going to replace anyway.
3
Not even Kursk's citizens really care. There's no grassroots resistance to Ukrainian's advance. Anyone understands that Ukrainians don't really want that territory, but it's only bargain chip for eventual negotiations.
3
@MaltedJacker Ask him, since it's what he did since the start of the war.
3
Those socialistic EU imbeciles that managed to keep covid-19 under control, while liberist US geniuses failed.
2
Until now Ukrainian air defenses concentrated on ballistic missiles. To intercept a missile you need a missile, and AA missiles are expensive. It's not economically viable to use an expensive missile to shoot down an inexpensive drone. Who launches the drone wins in any case. It's like the drone is his anti-missile weapon. But drones are slow and relatively low flying, so they are vulnerable to inexpensive projectiles. Old radar-guided or optronic AA guns, like the M163 and M167 the US phased out in 1994, or the SIDAM 25 the Italians put in storage a pair of decades ago. Those drones can only hit fixed and relatively large targets (like powerplants), so the number of possilbe valuable targets to protect is pretty limited.
2
@pavloshved6864 As Mike Tyson said: "everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth".
2
@ByGraceThroughFaith777 If it was a lethal weapon, then the cops tried to kill him, since he had been tased with that very same weapon.
2
It had already been shattered. They had been forced to a stalemate, and now are pushed back, by a third-tier European power.
2
He didnt' die on the plane. The plane landed in southern Russia, where the patient had been treated. That means that unfortunately he wasnt' dead yet, but the doctors solved the situation.
2
@djlee3276 Preferences about the equipment don't change the fact that cops are supposed to be able to discern guns from other objects.
2
Yeah, it happens they are not an artillery unit, so they can't shoot over 10kms distance.
2
Not only. The department, that had previously fired him, re-hired him for 42 days. This allowed him to apply for a disability pension on the basis of medical retirement (for PTSD, related to the shooting) and receive $2,500 per month for the rest of his life.
2
Not really. Until now Ukrainian air defenses concentrated on ballistic missiles. To intercept a missile you need a missile, and AA missiles are expensive. It's not economically viable to use an expensive missile to shoot down an inexpensive drone. Who launches the drone wins in any case. It's like the drone is his anti-missile weapon. But drones are slow and relatively low flying, so they are vulnerable to inexpensive projectiles. Old radar-guided or optronic AA guns, like the M163 and M167 the US phased out in 1994, or the SIDAM 25 the Italians put in storage a pair of decades ago. Those drones can only hit fixed and relatively large targets (like powerplants), so the number of possilbe valuable targets to protect is pretty limited.
2
Yeah. The situation in the Donbass is one classic in which the Russian are keeping on attacking, because loosing the initiative would be disastrous. So to divert troops from there is a big "no", and there's nothing sizable left anywere else. Russians have to patch the frontline in Kursk with ragtag formations of marines, Kadyrovites, conscripts... that have problems even in communicating each-other.
2
@Blinxcavalli In March the ratio was 5/1, and in the worst moments of Ukrainian ammo scarcity 10/1. But Ukrainians advised that, to keep that ratio, the Russians were losing guns at a record pace. Already a year ago 3/1 meant they were on par in effectiveness, since Ukrainian artillery is far more accurate. Since then Russians started to use abysmal quality North Korean shells, and to bring more antiques to the frontline to replace the guns they lost.
2
Admitting it had been sunk by a couple of subsonic missiles is admitting the Russian AA technology is a joke and their fleet is patetically defensless. It would have taken a pair of dozens of missiles like those to bypass the AA defenses of a western destroyer (not even a cruiser). They prefer to appear stupid than weak.
2
@kosh9639 So Russian army was ready for unarmed and untrained opponents?
2
@АндрейКаминский-г9в Or, in case of the Russian, before the war swearing there is not going to be any war, then, after having attacked by surprise, forbid to call it a war under treat of prison, then, when the war is approaching one year lenght, scold your citizen for not having still understood that's a war not with Ukraine but with NATO (that curiously had not yet employed a single soldier, ship, tank or aircraft).
2
Russian cockroaces still trying to spin fake news?
1
By... Russia? Seriously?
1
@njebei Add that to leave them there, only hampering the Russian attempts to resupply them, Ukrainians can use inexpensive drones to destroy expensive engineering equipment, that armies always have in short supply.
1
The Sudzha-Korenevo-Rylsk line is even shorter, and, to regain them, Russians should destroy Russian cities instead of Ukrainian ones for once.
1
@glintongordon6811 You want to guess how many thousands of men and hundred millions $ of material any of them costed?
1
You can find the clip of a pair of construction workers not having any problem in restraining an enraged cop that assaulted them, without harming him in the slightest, without tasers, handcuffs and guns. The Police should hire them to instruct the cops.
1
user-cx2xr7ge7k You mean so many already die to steal the land of a peaceful democracy?
1
He was fleeing holding an already spent non-lethal weapon that, even if not spent, has a maximum range of 10 feet. So what was the actual danger for the officers?
1
Katya Leblanc 🤣🤣 Tell you propaganda crap to Russians. Maybe they buy it, like they buy all the crap that comes from the Kremlin. As a Danish newspaper said, To be Russian is the punishment for the guilt having been born in Russia. For some reason, they want to export that misery beyond their borders too.
1
@Chopitup0567 Trice actually. Two hits and a miss.
1
So: "Patriot system is old, but we don't currently have anything to counter it".
1
"Ukraine should renounce to occupied territories, or our army will lose more of them!"
1
So what if the dissenters "aren't necessarily protesting the war on a moral level"? They don't want to fight it and, if forced, they'll be very low morale troops. Basically cannon fodder, whose death would make the war even more unpopular. What's this "overwhelming majority of average Russians" that supports the war doing for the troops? Where is the rush to provide them with decent food, boots, bulletproof vests?Ukrainians treat their soldiers like heroes. Russians? Like dirt to hide under the carpet. Those that are fleeing know that the "overwhelming majority of average Russians" supports the war enough, maybe, to put a "Z" on his car, but once in Ukraine he'll be on his own, depending on what he can loot to survive.
1
Yeah. They are training to swim across the Dnipro while carrying tanks on their shoulders.
1
@Nygge1982 Not was shooting, but shot. He didn't hit the cop, because the taser has a max. range of 10ft and the cop was farther, so and you can see the electrodes dragged by the guy running. At that point the taser was less dangerous than a water gun, but he took three bullets in the back anyway.
1
@jasonalekseyenko8819 If it's classified as a lethal weapon, then why the same cops used it TWICE on a drunk man? Did they want to kill an unarmed man on the spot?
1
@user1qaz2wsx3edc In the wet dreams of the Russians maybe.
1
Glock Coley He was fleeing, so what was the immediate danger of a stun gun for the officers? The purpose of the cops is not to kill who doesn't listen or doesn't promptly obey to them nor you can expect a drunk man to act reasonably.
1
@chinastar1177 They know the suspect didn't have a gun, because they already patted him to search for one, and the taser is of a bright yellow exactly to not be confused with a gun.
1
Jay Jay "diversionary tactic" uh? 120 batallions originally employed, 40% of them around Kiev. They had been so grind down that what remained of them after having been kicked out of the north couldn't be used in Donbass, where the Russians are now reduced to 75 batallions despite the reinforcements, instead of having 120 from the start. It's hilarious how the Russian shills prefer to endlessly give substance to the expression "stupid as a Russian general" instead of admitting a defeat.
1
One of the pipelines had never worked, the other had been shut since August, and none was expecting it to reopen. Several countries "empraced green energy" more than Germany, and are now in better conditions. Germany has problems not because it embraced green energy, but because it overrelied on Russia for its residual gas consumption. The output of green sources can be, and is, easily foreseen. Actually solar energy is the CHEAPEST form of energy and wind power costs from 10% to 50% less than coal power.
1
Funny! Now go steal a washing machine like a good Russian.
1
@salvadorallende448 That's the best you came of with, while licking the boot of your dictator?
1
@salvadorallende448 You can't type while licking?
1
@salvadorallende448 Crying? LOL! I'm laughing. Seeing Russian lapdogs trying to explain their faith in their masters is always funny.
1
@sleepyjoe7843 And you really believe this bullshit? Russian shill that joined youtube May 17, 2022?
1
Using lethal force to protect yourself from someone that's running away from you holding an already spent non-lethal weapon that, even if not spent, has a max range of 10 feet anyway? Good luck in court, if you are not a cop.
1
@HTtwentyten You stated: "any citizen would be justified in using lethal force to protect themselves in such a situation." not "I don't know the details of the case".
1
@HTtwentyten Nor in a "stand your ground" state or in a "duty to retreat" state you should have had the right to shoot someone that was fleeing from you.
1
@mrhump6132 "a very stressed induced situation"? Three fully armed cops vs. a single skinny unarmed guy is a "very stressful situation" now? It seems like librarians and embroiderers lives more dangerous lives than cops nowadays. For some reason this kind of stress only sems to affect cops. You don't hear of paramedics injecting air into car accident victims and "my bad, it was a stressful situation", or firemen smashing people's heads with their axes and "ops! sorry, I was very stressed". She mistook the gun for a taser not because she was stressed. Stop using this excuse, please. She did because, being used, like almost all the patrol cops, to use the taser (officially a "less (but still) lethal weapon" to be used in situations of absolute necessity) "lightly" as a cattle prod, or a punitive device for people that didn't obeyed to orders fast enough, she used it without thinking. She didn't mind and she didn't care.
1
@Baconrips You don't need to provide links to other situations. THIS situation, what the cops REALLY saw, is all in the camera. After she yelled "taser" he was only covering his head with his arms. There was no immediate treat. Cops are supposed to react to real treats, not projected ones. The REAL situation was a single, skinny, unarmed one vs three fully armed cops, and there was not a single reason to suppose it was otherwise.
1
"all we not-American tyres manufacturers were not planning to be supported by the US President this way but, hey, thanks anyway. BTW black lives matter for us too.".
1
So, when the drone factory will be levelled, you'll be able to cry foul, because America, France and Germany gave weapons to Saudi Arabia.
1
He was simply sleeping in his car in first place, not driving. He resisted the arrest (justified?), yeah. They knew he was drunk, and you can't expect drunk people to be reasonable. He actually resisted passively. Only after 31 seconds of struggle and, after having been tased, he hit one of the cops once, took the taser from the other (that shouldn't have extract it in first place. By doing so he left the other cop to struggle alone. He was too dependent on his gadgets) and fled. At that point he was fleeing, holding an already spent non-lethal weapon that, even if not spent, has a maximum range of 10 feet. So what was the actual danger for the officers that justified to shoot him three times in the back?
1
@Xover112 Infact it's not so much the Ukrainians that are superheroes, are the Russians that are inept.
1
They asked "Where are the Nazis?", yet they looted, tortured, raped and executed civilians? for them "Nazis" only means "whos' against us".
1
He was unarmed, they told him to crawl. This is an homicide.
1
What the Russians are doing in Kherson has a name, it's called "deportation".
1
I would not buy them at the price of tap water.
1
Only Russia will profit of that.
1
@havanasyndrome3024 You Putin's bootlickers are hilarious.
1
@serjik973 Russians are the only ones profiting from it, and thy are already UN certified war criminals.
1
@serjik973 So the Russians now steal, torture rape and kill civilians out of envy?
1
@serjik973 Russians are UN certified war criminals, and you are seeking childish justifications "Mom! He did it before! The US bombed Serbia! Why can't I torture Ukrainians now? Why Can't I steal some washing machine?"
1
If the Serbians decided to not show up in democratic elections, it's only their fault. Who didn't vote, automatically accepted to be govrened by the representatives of the ones who voted.
1
Russians can plenty enforce it on the citizens of the territories they occupy, as long they occupy it. IE, instead of advising the citizens of Kherson to leave the city, they can now deport them by force, so that the Ukrainians will liberate an empty city.
1
Not only. The department, that had previously fired him, re-hired him for 42 days. This allowed him to apply for a disability pension on the basis of medical retirement (for PTSD, related to the shooting) and receive $2,500 per month for the rest of his life.
1
The fact that he was evidently right and Heard was evidently an abuser (and she had been in her previous marriage as well) doesn't count, right? It's a question of "powerful men = bad".
1
No need. Until now Ukrainian air defenses concentrated on ballistic missiles. To intercept a missile you need a missile, and AA missiles are expensive. It's not economically viable to use an expensive missile to shoot down an inexpensive drone. Who launches the drone wins in any case. It's like the drone is his anti-missile weapon. But drones are slow and relatively low flying, so they are vulnerable to inexpensive projectiles. Old radar-guided or optronic AA guns, like the M163 and M167 the US phased out in 1994, or the SIDAM 25 the Italians put in storage a pair of decades ago. Those drones can only hit fixed and relatively large targets (like powerplants), so the number of possilbe valuable targets is pretty limited.
1
Considering the quality of the pro-Assad Syrian troops, Russian soldiers probably felt more treatened.
1
Russia can sanction the countries that provide weapons to Ukraine, if it wants. Do you think it will be useful? Fact is that being th aggressor and war criminal doesn't make you very popular.
1
@samirzemmache So now Russia can be the aggressor for? Envy? Russia invaded Ukraine, not the other way round. Spare me the cheap propaganda about the US "using" the Ukrainians. Sorry, Europe had not "erupted" with anything. I think you are watching too much propaganda channels.
1
@samirzemmache And so Putin is only suffering the consequences of what he did. All the weapons Kiev receives are well given. All the Russian soldiers that die deserve to die, and if the US decides to level the Iranian drone factory, then it deserved to be levelled.
1
@samirzemmache It's the direct consequence of your reasoning. Do you want to discuss about the Norman conquest of England too? "Raising security concerns" means nothing. If someone raises concerns about you walking on two legs, is he the justifeid to beat the crap out of you, if you don't start to crawl? If you want to talk about legality, a sovereign country can adhere to any organization it wants. There was not really a chance for Ukraine to become a NATO member, but a country adhering to NATO is not a treat to Russia in any way. That's a concern Russia completely invented. Ukraine didn't pose any treat to Russia. The invasion of Ukraine had no legal basis, it's completely unjustified and Iran is helping the aggressor. If you wanto to say that's only a matter of power, then US had the power to invade Iraq with minimal effort. Russia instead is a country with an economy the dimension of Spain that likes to pretend to be some sort of world military power, when all it has is a mass of untrained conscripts unsing a pile of old Soviet crap it doesn't have the money to replace once it's depleted, so Iran is simply betting on the wrong horse.
1
Fact is that US has the ability of sanction Iran and even to level the Iranian drone factory, Iran has not.
1
Not many. As for everywere, even if there are russophone Ukrainians, dialects are very different. A guy from Moskov or St. Petersburg (let alone somewhere in Siberia) would be recognised the moment he speak. Only Ukrainian separatists can pass for locals.
1
Russians violated the agreement since day one.
1
Infact. With an Internet connection, those people can still be productive. In Ukraine, they are useless.
1
People keep mistaking the language spoken by the people with some sort of ownership of the land by the country that bear the same name.
1
Until now Ukrainian air defenses concentrated on ballistic missiles. To intercept a missile you need a missile, and AA missiles are expensive. It's not economically viable to use an expensive missile to shoot down an inexpensive drone. Who launches the drone wins in any case. It's like the drone is his anti-missile weapon. But drones are slow and relatively low flying, so they are vulnerable to inexpensive projectiles. Old radar-guided or optronic AA guns, like the M163 and M167 the US phased out in 1994, or the SIDAM 25 the Italians put in storage a pair of decades ago. Those drones can only hit fixed and relatively large targets (like powerplants), so the number of possilbe valuable targets to protect is pretty limited.
1
Those drones are things that anyone with a minimum technical ability can assemble in his own box. The Banshee target drone, that half of the world uses since the '80s, has better performances.
1
Not only. The department, that had previously fired him, re-hired him for 42 days. This allowed him to apply for a disability pension on the basis of medical retirement (for PTSD, related to the shooting) and receive $2,500 per month for the rest of his life. Kill a man, win the lottery.
1
LOL! Russian armed forces are sitting on a pile of old Soviet crap they can't replace once it's dilapidated. We are seeing T62 tanks in first line.
1
Russians and their lapdog are really funny. They believe everything their master tells them. Even that they are fighting vs "52 countries from all over the world", or manufacturing "1500 tanks a year" instead of having their asses kicked by Ukraine. 😂
1
A normal day in Russia.
1
An orc trying to explain human behaviour? Sorry. You have to belong to the human kind first.
1
US is experiencing more daily new cases of coronavirus NOW than the entire EU was at their peak, and at their peak, inter-EU travels were banned.
1
Western military experts had been saying for months by now that Bakhmut has little strategic importance, and it's worth to be defended only because Russians are attacking it in human waves, so to defend it is a way to inflict huge losses for a comparatively little price. But Russian shills have to invent bullshit to believe their own narrative.
1
@Xover112 Patriot is an AA missile, so what does it count what AA missiles Russia has? They will not intercept each other. Russian ones are crap like almost all of their equipment BTW. What does it count if they'll intercept "every single Russian rocket?" They'll intercept more than the 90% that's currently intercepted. M777 are currently in use, along with other equivalent system like the FH70 and higly praised by the Ukrainians in comparison to the old Soviet crap they, and the Russians, still use, with the difference Russians have no alternatives. Same for the Himars. It's obvious they are more in the spotlight when they are a novelty than when Russian warehouses blowing up at several dozen miles from the frontline became the norm. Fact is that old NATO equipment is still better than what Russians have.
1
As an interviewed Ukrainian said about the post-war future "I just want to build a wall between Ukraine and Russia and forget about their existence".
1
Kherson is on high land. The only thing the Russians can flood are their own trenches on the east side of the river.
1
Bunny is an happy tank. He fights zombies, and his commander wouldn't left his turret to be blown off.
1
Prigozin is seeing the window approaching.
1
@laverdadocultaestuni2297 Russian fake account that joined youtube 5 days ago. No devaluated rubles for you my friend.
1
@kevingray3550 Off topic I know, but it's a laughable conspiracy theory. The US where at war with Japan since the moment the Japanese decided the strike. The outcome of the single operation was not important, because an expeditionary force had been sent to hit the US anyway, and that means war. Had the Japanese fleet been intercepted and sunk in open sea, the US would have been at war all the same (and starting from a better position). AND Pearl Harbour was not an isolated operation. Contemporary to Pearl Harbour, The Philippines, Guam and Wake Island had been attacked. All those operations were coordinated, any of them was more than enough of a "casus belli" and would have been performed whatever would have happened to the Pearl Harbor strike, that could have failed, or been delayed, or cancelled, for whatever reason.
1
@rhysvanwyk9367 The Russians don't have T14s and Su57s in nearly enough quantity to "fight" .. They are only for show. To impress the likes of you. Russia is a country with the GDP of Spain that pretend to be some sort of superpower.
1
@alexsilent5603 Street protests are democratic (infact you don't see them in Russia), resignations happen sometimes, and whatever happened to Yanukovich was not Russian business. Putin is a democratically elected president that imprison and kills his opponents and represses freedom of the press, so not democratic. Elections are not enough to define a democracy. In Soviet Union there were elections too. Ukrainians doesn't have (incredibly at this point) any intention of unalive all of you. They only want you out of their country.
1
@louissosa1535 It's my comment on Russian shills like you. Wasn't it clear enough? Obviously not. Russians shills are not supposed to understand something. You are becoming everyday funnier for the increasingly difficult attempt to cover Russian failures with hilarious boasts, like that of Ukraine signing a declaration of surrender at this point.
1
@akankundaboazben2331 It's always time to negotiate. Russians f°çk off the internationally recognised borders. Ukraine can apply to enter whatever international organization it wants. War criminals handed to the Hague court. War reparations can be discussed. Russia already is a shithole, it would be cruel to impoverish it much more. It seems like a good deal.
1
@louissosa1535 A counter argument to the idiocies of Russian shills? Because, to you, your dream of Ukraine signing a declaration of surrender is an "argument"? Sorry, you shouldn't use words you don't know the meaning of. You are too stupid to know the definition of "argument". BTW, to indicate some name (but only the name obviously, you are not able to understand, let alone to explain, the thesis) like they can corroborate your idiocies of Ukraine signing a declaration of surrender is a tactic only Russian shills are idiot enough to fall for. Listen to professor Jeffrey Sachs, Colonel Douglas Macgregor, Scott Ritter and professor John Mearsheimer 2015 seminar which has 28M views. Maybe you'll understand how funny Russian shills are when they tell their idiocies.
1
@garretttobin7451 No. I think Putin is a coward. A wile little coward. It's quite surprising how many people seems eager to lick his boots. Degrading themself by inventing the most hilarious bullshit to support his propaganda. Someone is born a slave I guess.
1
@bobhemphut4011 Zelensky is supporting his troops near to the frontline. Little coward Putin is hiding in his bunker. Russia invaded Ukraine, not the other way round. Russia is a dictatorship run by a little coward dictator hidden in his bunker like Hitler, not Ukraine. None cares about the colour of that shitty dictatorship. It's brown, btw. Oligarchs run Russia, not Europe.
1
@Kim.Ju-ae Trump would have given Ukraine to Putin in Exchange of a pat on the head and being called "good boy", like he did with Syria.
1
There still are Russian cockroaches around I see.
1
@0isay You are as German as me (and I'm not, if there was any doubt).
1
@АндрейКаминский-г9в "Bestiality"? Sorry, in this conflict there is one part that is UN certified war criminals (Russians), and one that's not. Nazis and Allied are not equal.
1
@АндрейКаминский-г9в You are more than a little ignorant. There's no point in trying to explain you anything, even in the simplest terms, but it's possible for people with a functioning brain to read this message. Sistematic war crimes committed makes a side criminal, because it's evident that the leaders encourages them. Spare your "they are all equal" for dictators' bootlickers and quite ridicolous shills like you. Your propaganda doesn't work here.
1
@АндрейКаминский-г9в That's all a Russian shill pretending to be smart is able to come up with? Starting to blabber like an idiot about "collective punishment" when none did before? 😂 "collective punishments" are mass executions of Ukrainian civilians the Russian performed. Are things like those that made their side criminal. But come on. I'm curious about what other marvels a braindead propagandist is instructed to type.
1