Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Daily Mail World" channel.

  1.  @GokWan-jl1wu  Not really. It wasn't even a Nazi tank. It's one of 9 Panzer V built after the war by order of the British occupation autority for testing. After the tests had been done, in Britain, the tank ended in a British scrapyard, and the man acquired it there in the '70s. So he even imported it legally.
    14
  2. It's possible, but difficult. First of all, rifle sights are made to compensate for the bullet drop on a horizontal line. The more high you shoot, the more they overcompensate. So you are not likely to hit anything. Then, much of the drone is not very sensible to rifle projectiles. The only vulnerable part is the control unit. When it's so close to the target, a drone doesn't really need his engine (it can glide), the control surfaces are actuated by few cables, and some hole on them is just a nuisance. Fuel is hardly ignited by a rifle projectile fired from afar, and even the explosive of the warhead is likely to be too stable to be ignited by a projectile.
    13
  3. It's clearly still afloat. The vertical stand of the bow is a standard maneuver in the Russian navy.
    11
  4. The sights should be over the gun, where you see the void space. He's firing blindly. Even with the sights present, they are made for short range combat. The utility of that thing as an artillery piece is practically none.
    9
  5. The sights had been removed (you can see the void space over the gun) so he's firing blindly. Even with the sights present, they are made for short range combat. The utility of that thing as an artillery piece is practically none.
    5
  6. It exploded alone, mid-air, just short of the roof, and a not-fixed camera was just waiting for it to enter in the picture. It reeks of false-flag.
    4
  7. Nato has still not showed up.
    2
  8. Ukrainians usually do something ingenious and useful. Here the sights had been removed (you can see the void space over the gun) so he's firing blindly. Even with the sights present, they are made for short range combat. The utility of that thing as an artillery piece is practically none.
    2
  9. Not really. The sights had been removed (you can see the void space over the gun) so he's firing blindly. Even with the sights present, they are made for short range combat. The utility of that thing as an artillery piece is practically none.
    1
  10. And even with the sights present, they are made for short range combat. The utility of that thing as an artillery piece is practically none. It can only fire at small-arms range. It can be of some use (once reinstalled the sights) only to reinforce a fixed position.
    1
  11.  @reecom9884  In a trench, the gunner would be protected by the trench.
    1
  12.  @reecom9884  Why you should move it? When I said "to reinforce a FIXED position" it was pretty clear the position was fixed. It's not that difficult to cover and camouflage a so small artillery piece. I've sen done with way bigger 105mm howitzers.
    1
  13.  @reecom9884  And what does it counts what the Russians have done or not in "It can be of some use (once reinstalled the sights) only to reinforce a fixed position."? The fact that the cannon is a direct fire gun with a short range (that's what I said in my first post, why are you repeating it?). it's EXACTLY the reason it's sole utility would be to reinforce a fixed position. Long range guns capable of indirect fire are artillery pieces that fire from behind the first line.
    1
  14.  @reecom9884  Russian have a lot of trenches, and many of them had been prepared for months.
    1
  15.  @reecom9884  And so? Do you think that ALL the Russian trenches had been passed? Ukraine would have won the war in that case.
    1
  16.  @reecom9884  So Russian use trenches and, as already said, that gun "can be of some use (once reinstalled the sights) only to reinforce a fixed position."
    1
  17.  @reecom9884  And, even in the improbable case you have a complete knowledge of al the Ukrainian frontline, who cares what they have? The statement was: "It can be of some use (once reinstalled the sights) only to reinforce a fixed position." NONE EVER stated it WILL be used like that.
    1
  18. It makes drones explode with the power of mind it seems.
    1
  19.  @ЕвгенияВитальевна-ц3я  это не фиксированная камера. Кто-то это снимает.
    1
  20.  @ЕвгенияВитальевна-ц3я  а, когда дрон попадает в кадр и взрывается, он даже не морщится, только чуть позже опускает кадр. Пожалуйста...
    1
  21.  @ЕвгенияВитальевна-ц3я  Он не качался от пьянства, так что уж точно даже не русский. Извините, но когда кто-то прибегает к какой-то мнимой национальной природе в качестве оправдания... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBLjB5qavxY На 0:17, 2:22 и 2:57 видно, как россияне, державшие в руках камеру, реагировали на Челябинский метеорит. Не иначе, как поступил бы любой другой человек в любой другой части мира. Стабильные изображения были с DASHCAMS.
    1
  22.  @ЕвгенияВитальевна-ц3я Так вам нравятся только ВАШИ обобщения о русских? РЖУ НЕ МОГУ! Если вы этого не поняли, я считаю ваше обобщение столь же ложным, как и то, которое изображает русских пьяницами. Вы хотите верить, что это настоящая воздушная атака, снятая настоящим парнем, который небрежно фотографировал нужную крышу в нужное время и совершенно не реагировал на полет и взрыв (в отличие от того, что делал ЛЮБОЙ другой русский в вашем собственный пример)? Повезло тебе. Может быть, верить ерунде тоже русская черта.
    1
  23.  @ЕвгенияВитальевна-ц3я  Дело не в панике, а в том, чтобы не оставаться совершенно неподвижным, когда происходит что-то неожиданное. Вы ведь видели, как РУССКИЕ отреагировали на ВАШЕМ примере. ОНИ НЕ ОСТАВАЛИСЬ ПОЛНОСТЬЮ НЕПОДВИЖНЫМИ. Вам не нравится, что они реагируют так, как поступил бы ЛЮБОЙ в ЛЮБОЙ части мира? Вы хотите верить, что это русская черта - насрать? Не мои проблемы.
    1
  24. Even with the original sights present, they are made for short range combat. The utility of that thing as an artillery piece is practically none. It can only fire at small-arms range and without protection for the crew. It can be of some use (once reinstalled the sights) only to reinforce a fixed position.
    1
  25. They usually do something ingenious and useful. Here the sights had been removed (you can see the void space over the gun) so he's firing blindly. Even with the sights present, they are made for short range combat. The utility of that thing as an artillery piece is practically none.
    1
  26. Not really. The sights had been removed (you can see the void space over the gun) so he's firing blindly. Even with the sights present, they are made for short range combat. The utility of that thing as an artillery piece is practically none.
    1