Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "CNBC Television" channel.

  1. She dodged every important question.
    4
  2.  @shaneviola8848  Dont be fooled, she didnt actually answer some inportant questions just danced around them.
    4
  3.  @ML-vj1vk  I think it’s pretty much nailed on that a religious zealot will make the worst judgements possible.
    3
  4.  @trashtoast7007  they are asked questions on climate change because environmental issues are regularly brought before the SC. Why don’t you know that?
    2
  5. They know it’s the Russians. On the other hand, you don’t put anything worth protecting on a network.
    2
  6. I agree, they already are.
    2
  7. The Hand Maidens Tale thats all I see when Barrett appears.
    1
  8. The US is not behind its just hype.
    1
  9. USN SM-3 Block IIA - Mach 17 "coughs." Earlier SM-3 Blocks Mach 10. Even Patriots a were mach 5 missiles 20 years ago.
    1
  10. I think America has been too naive and complacent.
    1
  11. Filled with western electronics.
    1
  12. We dont have to, we can just rely on their horrible inaccuraccy.
    1
  13.  Brendan O' Neil  They wont be moving at that speed and manouvering, turning circles would be thousands of miles in size and the weapons would be fried then break up, let alone hit anything. In the terminal phase they will be moving a LOT slower thus vulnerable to intercept.
    1
  14.  @hylimm  that’s exactly what it is.
    1
  15. The US is not behind they just decided these weapons were of little value.
    1
  16.  @trashtoast7007  by the way, I don’t have a Dog in this fight.
    1
  17. They have test beds and prototypes that missed the target by 25 miles. They can keep them.
    1
  18.  @JKMT  Not really, these glide vehicles cannot carry large warheads. The shielding required would be heavy and substantial more than likely, as well as manouvering devices.That reduces throw weight.
    1
  19. Yes, but pretty much everybody has hypersonic missiles, ie a lot of missiles already travel much faster than Mach 5, USN SM-3 block Block IIA for example is a Mach 17 missile. Even old Patriots are Mach 5 weapons. That Chinese drone launched a missile, separating at those speeds was impressive but I dont see the tactical utility, an SLBM does the same job and does it faster launched on a flat trajectory. Plus hideously expensive.
    1
  20. That will start a war of attrition. Also, Russia has literally disconnected itself from the internet it has its own network now.
    1
  21. Anything more than Mach 5 is classed at hypersonic, the US has lots of missiles that have speeds in excess of Mach 5. The old Patriot is a Mach 5 missile, THAAD is a Mach 8 missile, SM-3 is a Mach 17 missile etc etc.
    1
  22. The US can afford to be behind in these weapons there are too expensive to be built in large numbers.
    1
  23. Different systems.
    1
  24. Both relatively useless strategically since they are prototypes that cant hit the test targets. I dont think America has anything to fear.
    1
  25.  @YohannesKristiawan  It is hype to get more funding. Why would a man be afraid of a gun that fires a dud?
    1