Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "TomoNews US" channel.

  1. Russians acting in their typical unprofessional manner.
    4
  2. He`ll be chillin on the beach dont worry.
    4
  3. Kim wants to survive, he can`t do that by attacking the US. Everything he has done thus far is about that survival ethos, he can test launch all the missiles he wants but in the end he knows implicitly, that if he attacks the US or her allies, his country is toast and more importantly for him, he would be dead too. Despite the rhetoric, Kim is far from stupid or mad, I bet he is having a good laugh at all of us right now.
    4
  4. I really wished we had embarked on building 3 of the new carrier class. That way, we could have had 2 ships available at all times, with only 2 hulls they are "guaranteeing" about 250 days per year when both will be available, either side of this, we will only be able to field one hull at a time. We DO have the money available to build 3 ships and equip them but we choose to spend it on other "stuff". Another issue I have is the lack of an up to date CIWS even as basic as a SEARAM mount to give it some stand off range for self defence. Hell even a lousy 8 cell Sylver A-50 for ASTER-15 would do, its an active missile so ARTISAN would suffice for cueing.
    3
  5. +akx You need o think again and study the capabilities of complex payload ICBMs and Ballistic missile profiles, if you did you would see that these systems are ZERO threat to Russian ICBMs.
    3
  6. SSBNs dont charge around at high speed making noise on patrol, they crawl.
    3
  7. +Jabir Axmed Russia is much more "broke" than NATO, what are they going to do? throw rocks at it.
    2
  8. MrVukojeB Nothing you said made any sense. No context.
    2
  9. +HEKTOR RAMAN Its not designed to counter Russian ICBMs so why even mention this?
    2
  10. It was part of the price we had to pay for US aid during WWII.
    2
  11. Nor will Kim.
    2
  12. No they havent, it`s a different weapon.
    2
  13. Kid, its better to remove personally identifiable information , where I come from its called PERSEC, delete your uncles name off this post , I respectfully suggest.
    2
  14. So the LEAVE hypocrites are moaning that people are calling for a rerun of the referendum and telling us we should just suck it up, but forget farrage said before the ref that if the result were close, he would push for ....a second referendum.
    1
  15. ***** Are you on LSD?
    1
  16. ***** No I see you doing it in the mens toilets for free on the hour every hour. A guy cant even take a dump without hearing sucking sounds from your cubicle.
    1
  17. ***** Yes, you should get your gnashers seen to, they whistle when you suck.
    1
  18. ***** Nobody cares what you think though "Like An ASS."
    1
  19. ***** You only confirmed you are a pompous ass.
    1
  20. Yes. Hypothesis confirmed. Touche, now piss off.*****
    1
  21. ***** I am old enough to be your pappy, as I have said, piss off, you have nothing interesting to say.
    1
  22. ***** Are you still blabbing?? Do you want a kiss or something boy? Stop stalking me and I do not swing that way, sorry.
    1
  23. ***** Your mother is more entertaining than you are.
    1
  24. ***** YAWN. Go back to sleep grandad, the Bowls are on later.
    1
  25. +coolwitme1 Nope, AEGIS ashore can NOT shoot down ICBMs. What space based interceptors are you on about?? This isnt a Marvel Comic book kiddo.
    1
  26. coolwitme1 Yes its me again, SDI was a dead end, a money pit which yielded NO solution and was shitcanned. It did however produce some neat technology. The KKVs and IIR systems evolved into what we are using today but the truth is, it would cost America about 200 Billion dollars to defeat a notional North Korean ICBM using a space based solution and that cost is to counter ONE single missile with a relatively primitive decoy payload. AEGIS Ashore and the EPAA is for theatre missile defence in the IRBM and SRBM range, not to counter Russian ICBMs. I know that Russia is only concerned with what the evolution will look like in the future. Right now the new kid on the block is going to be SM-3 Block 2 A, its a much faster missile with much greater range. The next iteration of SM-3 in a couple of future blocks WILL have "some" capability against certain types of ICBM, this is what has Russia nervous but even then, they would need to base dozens of AEGIS ashore systems all over Europe with thousands of SM-3s to counter a full bloodied Russian strike, thats never going to happen and this is where Russian paranoia comes to the fore.
    1
  27. I do not need to have worked at the Pentagon, I only need to understand simple physics and the Specs of SM-3 and Russian ICBMs. Next you are going to tell me the Aurora is real.coolwitme1
    1
  28. coolwitme1 PMSL.
    1
  29. hardly a crisis, nothing has been said since.
    1
  30. Bullshit.
    1
  31. Wolf. Ie Thats exactly what he said.
    1
  32. they arrested 3 suspects.
    1
  33. chrisbea49  No mate, I said 3 Hulls would have been better, not 3 SMALLER hulls. 3 or 4 small CVS type hulls are less economic to equip and operate than 2 large CVF but I cannot argue with you about the tiny airwings they are going to get. In wartime and emergencies they can surge to 48 but only if we actually buy the F-35 in decent numbers.
    1
  34. chrisbea49  The studies were done in the 90s when they compared having 3/4 Invincible type CVS hulls versus two 65,000 t CVF, the conclusion was it was more cost effective and efficient to build 2 large hulls instead of operate and equip 3/4 smaller ones, ie put your eggs in two baskets instead of 3/4 which tactically may be an error. However, economic reality means we didnt want to pay for 3, if you buy 3 you have to pay to equip all 3, so the costs spiral and you lose the reason you wanted to build 2 in the first place. For me it is imperative we buy enough jets to fly from the 2 we are building. I do think the F-35 is way too expensive I would have been happy with Rafales or Superbugs or at a stretch, Navalized Typhoons but that is a big piece of work. Hell even a Navlized Gripen would have been nice, the UK is  doing that work right now for export purposes with SAAB.
    1
  35. Hope your cousin gets the CVF, they recently announced the CO of the QE, a Commodore no less.
    1
  36. Bernie Lobb Yes I remember the dits, mostly seakings I recall but around 26 SHAR`s? 52 sounds a high number, remember the Group was using other ships as extra deck real estate  like ATLC before she was hit, for helicopters I think.
    1
  37. +Steve Polychronopolous This isnt the Soviet Union anymore, why do you think the Cubans wouldn't tell Putin to fuck off? Do you think Putin could just pitch up on a beach in havana and say, hey raul, I have some Nukes I want to install here, lmao.
    1
  38. Steve Polychronopolous Bullshit, Cubans dont give a rats ass about Russia and they haven't for a long time, when the Soviet Union died castro fell out of love with the whole idea he felt betrayed, learn some history, in any case, Fidel is now a mumbling wreck. Raul is just waiting for him to pass away so he can move Cuba into the 21st century, that does not include basing Russian Nukes on Cuban soil, or anyone elses nukes for that matter, I hope to see an independent Cuba for decades to come they need to remain non aligned for their own sake.
    1
  39. Cuba will take the economic benefits but they will never sell out completely to the US. The Chinese have tried poking their nose into Cuba with oil exploration and tried to screw Cuba over on that but Cuba gave them the bird.Whitney Pyant
    1
  40. Whitney Pyant I have been to Cuba many times and have friends there, they do not want to become a US sock Puppet, they want friendly terms on their terms.
    1
  41. Steve Polychronopolous Err NOPE< he doesn't actually, they are respectfully waiting for Fidel to pass away before they come back to the world. RAUL is firmly in charge. "Cuba is and always was independent.. Soviet Union never pressured Cuba in any diplomatic ways and always let them control their soveirnty" Cuba was a Soviet sock puppet which is why they placed Missiles there in the 60s please get a grip, proxy wars r us. Things changed, there are no russian military in Cuba today, why do you think that is?
    1
  42. Which government my dear?Whitney Pyant
    1
  43. New Nationalist European Dawn "The S-400 deployed in Porazava would defend against NATO missiles coming from Poland," You seem to think that NATO Leaders sit around in dark rooms plotting a war on Russia. The truth is they are more concerned about their personal portfolios of stocks and shares, relax soldier.
    1
  44. "A NATO attack is within the realm of the possible however unlikely." Not even remotely within the realms of possibility. What does Russia have that we want? Nothing. You overstate Russia`s importance to the EU and USA. The S-400 is merely "just another SAM system" Lets not give it mythical powers it does not have. No SAM system ever fielded has a 100% success rate and there are a thousand ways to defeat it electronically, the makers of the system admit that, because they are very smart fellows.New Nationalist European Dawn
    1
  45. New Nationalist European Dawn Mate, you cannot defend a region with "one" S-400 battery, its not even possible, so your idea of placing singleton systems in the "strategic places" you mentioned is not workable. Low level penetration is a simple tool you may use to circumvent any SAM system, the S-400 radars will not be seeing low level attackers for one simple reason, the Earth is not flat. If you want a NATO attack on Russia, you have to convince all NATO leaders that they need to do it, never going to happen unless Putin wakes up insane one day.
    1
  46. New Nationalist European Dawn " The assumption in either way of reading this is that the United States will at some point attack Russian (or Russian-controlled) territory.  As a retired officer who spent most of his career in the Cold War Air Force, I can honestly say that I've never perceived very much interest in doing so." thanks for that link, pretty much what I said earlier.
    1
  47. Some people think the S-400 can make an area with a footprint on the ground of 400 KM "sterile" against air threats, they would be incorrect. Its a great looking system , on paper, but its not been tested at all in real combat.
    1
  48. "How can you know it is not capable of such feat if the system has never been tested in combat?" Because NO SAM system is capable of doing anything of the sort. Either on paper or in the real world because you run into the laws of physics, the S-400 cannot circumvent those.New Nationalist European Dawn
    1
  49. Bobby g. SATAN, you mean the SS-18 which is being retired because it is dangerously decrepit? Oh, and last time I checked, the S-400 doesn't attack cities kiddo,.
    1
  50. Yes, the police are slowly but surely militarizing themselves, these robots were used to counter IEDs in Iraq, Afghanistan.
    1
  51. they dont have to.
    1
  52. archimba Looking at Syria, Russians aren't bombing much of anything there either.
    1
  53. archimba  Its fact, Russia is mostly bombing ruined buildings with no inhabitants because the Rebels get advanced warning  where the Russians are going to strike thanks to US Intel. SHACK.
    1
  54. The US military has the Russian military tapped for sound and vision, its just that you idiots dont realize it. We got you wired dude.archimba
    1
  55. archimba I will give you an example, back in the 1960s, the USN pinged EVERY Soviet submarine underway in every ocean on the planet at the same time on the same day, it was like a "We know exactly where every one of your Submarines are at any given time" This is 2015......why do you think Putin summoned Assad to Moscow rather than talking to him on a "secure link". DONT BE A DUMBASS.
    1
  56. archimba What in the fuck does Vietnam have to do with me saying we intercept and decrypt  ALL Russian comms?
    1
  57. archimba What in the actual fuck are you on about?
    1
  58. Talk here, if you have anything to say, grow a pair of balls and let everyone else see it.archimba
    1
  59. ***** they don`t have the BALLS.
    1
  60. "Russian Subs parking in front of the US coast for months and the USN didn't realize they were there." Aww, same fantasy of the USS Donald Cook shutdown bullshit, lmao silly little Russian fan boys you make me laugh, we knew that boat was there all along. Your shitty Navy has 6 SSBNs and only one of them is ever fit for a deterrent patrol, the rest of them are laid up in port leaking cesium into the Arctic.*****
    1
  61. "This isn't possible anymore" Only to someone like you who doesn't have a CLUE. What? you think Snowden was privy to anything but low level data? hahaha.*****
    1
  62. MrVukojeB Well I certainly will not find out by watching Russian TV.
    1
  63. "Trust me" Why would I trust you? Do I know you? Nope. What the fuck are you droning on about? MrVukojeB
    1
  64. Helena the Far right do not run things, and they will not as long as we keep Farrage out of power and BoJo can fuck off with him.
    1
  65. 1chish  The RAF already have their eye on the CAPTOR-E successor.
    1
  66. I think its closer than you think:P
    1
  67. As factual as can be posted here, I will post a link for you mate, make of it what you will but CAPTOR -E successor  is something the RAF want and wanted rather than  CAP-E because they felt it was more advanced.
    1
  68. ZolaMagic25  Its called deterrence. It has worked well. Stops the big boys from killing us all.
    1
  69. ZolaMagic25  Against anyone with a similar massive conventional and nuclear force. Lets face it, two small non nuclear armed countries squabbling  aren't going to destroy the planet.
    1
  70. I wouldnt like to try!
    1
  71. Oh shut up grizzly you are so full of shit.
    1
  72. NuclearGrizzly Have you won something?? If it was an argument I am not seeing any scent of victory on your part. You lost the day you were born. You are a Dinosaur, there is no place for morons like you anymore, lets dig up Jules Verne and send you back to 1950`s `Murica because you don`t belong here. Racist prick.
    1
  73. Drink Up, Sucka! Soon, nobody will be listening to people like him.
    1
  74. NuclearGrizzly You are a white south African, still butthurt about losing to Madiba? Aww poor Gwizzly. I am still waiting to see evidence of your superior education, but I don`t have a century. HILARY 2016!
    1
  75. NuclearGrizzly YAWN.
    1
  76. NuclearGrizzly ZZZZzzzz, piss off small minded fuckwit.
    1
  77. NuclearGrizzly Put a sock in it Small Bear nobody is interested in anything you have to say. HILARY 2016!
    1
  78. NuclearGrizzly Stop replying you silly little twit.
    1
  79. NuclearGrizzly Haha, you just declared ownership on a social media site, so not only are you a racist, you are dumber than most of them. Say hi to your Moroccan relatives, in Tex-ass. Get smart.
    1
  80. NuclearGrizzly post smarter next time you silly little trailer park dweller.
    1
  81. NuclearGrizzly ZZZZZZZzzz
    1
  82. Its deep draught is 71,000 t so no, it isn't half the size. To be fair its irrelevant nit picking.
    1
  83. Helga Schmidlap  2 large ships of this size are more economical to run than 3 or 4 smaller carriers. Thats about the bottom line and why they were ordered.
    1
  84. Then the Russians must be on the same drugs because their future carriers look almost the same as the CVF design with dual islands.
    1
  85. Nice live combat AEGIS test, thanks for that.
    1
  86. They are saying he told them he "wanted to kill white people", then targets Cops ONLY. What is wrong with this picture?
    1
  87. +17th WhitePrince Only if you think this BMD is designed to shoot down Russian missiles and only if you think Russia is planning to attack the West with Nuclear missiles , none of which is true.
    1
  88. Apologies Frosty, you are right, I stand corrected, for some reason I was thinking of Diego Garcia.
    1