Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "Daily Mail World" channel.

  1.  @riheg  There were serial identification stamps on lots of parts of that shot down missile, that identified it as a Kinzhal. Manufacturers needs those ID numbers to manufacture any weapons system. It was a Kinzhal, since you don’t know what the inside of any missile looks like how would you even know otherwise? As for US Colonels - they theorise based on the claimed capabilities of Kinzhal, which supposedly reached Mach 10 in the terminal phase. UKR Radar operators have now said Kinzhal was only capable of one third of that speed so Mach 3, now ask those US Colonels what Patriot PAC-3 capability would be against a Mach 3 target.
    3
  2. Globally Influnza dropped 90% in 2020.
    2
  3. I did not miss that Kyiv does not look like the Moon, what happened to those Russian missiles?
    2
  4. I’ve just checked their stock, over the last 5 years of has only climbed in the case of LM, as for Raytheon, since January it has only climbed too. I don’t even know what you are talking about. Unless you look over a small snapshot period of 5 days which is useless as a comparator.
    2
  5. You can’t hide your tears, they are written into your comment.
    2
  6. 7 from 7, and if you believe otherwise then you must have seen the extensive damage Kinzhal did to Kyiv, if so share it with us please.... You see how this works?
    2
  7. @Alt Fit Then every Brexiter should be a Knight.
    1
  8. BS.
    1
  9. Another no channel content BOT.
    1
  10. They shot down another 6 Kinzhal today, that’s how Patriot does its “talking.” Not from some pro Russian dumbo on YouTube.
    1
  11. Where is the evidence of them all hitting the ground? Do Kinzhals “vanish” in thin air,
    1
  12. Sounds like they arent all a bunch of stupid racist Brexshitters in London.
    1
  13. They adapted.
    1
  14. Well you keep saying you’ve destroyed the Patriots but we still keep seeing Patriot launches. Make up your mind.
    1
  15.  @jama7538  tanks r us, how many do you need?
    1
  16. Currently it looks like they are unmasking Russian Arty positions to take them out with HIMARS and M982 using Recce drones. Of course, the Russians have a vote and will try to destroy those UKR armoured breach attempts.
    1
  17. Not like this.
    1
  18. No, there were other ballistic missiles too and cruise missiles. The rate of fire from that Patriot battery was impressive. I’d love to see S-400 do that using cold launch.
    1
  19. It’s Kyiv, silly Botnik.
    1
  20.  @robinpbradford  no.
    1
  21. Elected twice unlike that muppet Johnson.
    1
  22. They shot down another 6 Kinzhal today I know you have hurt feelings about that - do you want some Kleenex?
    1
  23. Another no channel content BOT.
    1
  24. It doesn’t need to be a scramjet, a ballistic missile just needs to go up high enough to attain high velocity on the way down. So they need to make a better “Kinzhal” that has medium ballistic range but that means a larger missile with more fuel and no MIG is going to be able to carry that missile.
    1
  25. Im more impressed by the spectacular failure of the “unstoppable” Kinzhal - Kyiv shot down another 6 of them today. It turned out Kinzhal was a wet lettuce and slower than one too.
    1
  26.  @mpkid5  No it wasnt.
    1
  27. Anybody who was a member of the BNP and Far Right organizations is in fact - Far Right. PERGIDA, EDL, BNP.
    1
  28. Well, you voted for it dumbo.
    1
  29. You only saw one ground impact - which means only one Russian weapon hit the ground. What happened to the other Russian missiles?
    1
  30. They really need more MICLICs.
    1
  31.  @Наденька-в4е  Nonsense, those Sat photos show nothing that can be positively identified as any prior Patriot battery components.
    1
  32.  @BannedByMe  It is because you are carefully selecting a time period to make a point that is totally without meaning, stocks go up and down naturally, investors look at long term trends not snapshots. Any price fluctuations are not affected by equipment performance in the field, if that were the case, Russian defence manufacturers would have all gone bankrupt .
    1
  33.  @BannedByMe  You cannot prove any Patriot was destroyed and the pictures show no such thing, to be honest you should be ashamed or maybe you are just naive.
    1
  34.  @BannedByMe  Now The Economist has gotten access to a UKR Patriot operator for an article, who stated Kinzhal was only capable of 30% of the velocity claimed by the Russians. Now it all makes perfect sense.
    1
  35. Tommy Robinson - FAR RIGHT - NAZI - RACIST - LIAR - BIGOT - COWARD- MUG.
    1
  36. Another no channel content BOT \ fake account, who pays you?
    1
  37. Elected twice I bet that hurts doesnt it.
    1
  38. Too risky for the front lines, it’s only semi mobile in truth. They really need more MAMBA systems.
    1
  39.  @allisone369  They only have 2 Patriot batteries. I think 2 or 3 more are in the pipeline. I agree they will have to push them forwards, those emplacements will probably be kept busy defending themselves rather than the troops. MAMBA is far more mobile but they only have one of those - UKR needs equivalent or better systems to replace their S-300s.
    1
  40.  @allisone369  right now they should be getting more armour ie MBTs that is what they are asking for. And of course F-16s. The day is coming when they will be using several hundred M1s.
    1
  41.  @Britlurker says who?
    1
  42. What would they have done about the KA-52?
    1
  43.  @CButler8  the Ka-52 ATGMs outrange all MANPADS the AFU have unfortunately.
    1
  44.  @CButler8  I hear you, I don’t think Ukraine had an option since they faced well established defences covered by Arty and AH. Russia has a couple of hundred AH.
    1
  45. Shut up.
    1
  46. Its called genome sequencing.
    1
  47.  @lw1zfog  i think it’s funny to constantly hear people who didn’t pass high school math telling me the statistics are all wrong.
    1
  48. more cases = more hospitalisations = more hospital deaths to Covid.
    1
  49. Article 50 has already been agreed Einstein.
    1
  50. Another no channel content BOT Sir Patrick.
    1
  51. Thats some mental gymnastics there mate.
    1
  52. Unless you send Merkava 4s they have to make do with what they have.
    1
  53. If you people click on the accounts of most of the posters on here, you will see that they are new accounts with zero content, most are BOT accounts or fake accounts that always spawn in large numbers whenever something of interest happens with Brexit. Learn to spot them, they offer nothing other than division, agitators and most likely from foreign servers.
    1
  54. These are the adults, Leavers are the petulent children.
    1
  55.  @littlefluffybushbaby7256  Could have been a DM-22.
    1
  56. Where are the impacts from all of the other Russian Kinzhals? Did they miss the city or where they shot down. I think you know the answer.
    1
  57. Only a sadistic leader who is totally nuts.
    1
  58. Wrong, he will have an Appeal hearing.
    1
  59. He`s reached a dead end, he wont repeat the court protests because he will not pass go and go straight to jail. He is forever in the cross hairs of the establishment, an enemy you don`t want. Ever.
    1
  60. Its Russian State TV take with a pinch of salt.
    1
  61. No MSE. Only CRI.
    1
  62.  @mpkid5  So what about the videos of Bradleys recovered inside of buildings what do you make of those videos Vatnik?
    1
  63.  @mpkid5  As Lloyd Austin has said, Russian sources show the same footgae and photos time and time again. If an IFV is burnt out it is not recoverable, but blast damage or punctured armour can be repaired, thrown tracks can be repaired etc etc. If not, replacemenst are being furnished. The US has something like 6,000 Bradleys, and lets not pretend Russia has an endless supply of equipment.
    1
  64. What do you mean? Is that a threat of violence?
    1
  65. The blow is because debris hit some buildings. Debris from obliterated Kinzhals.
    1
  66.  @riheg  why do you think that debris was “obviously not from a Kinzhal.” Which components do you believe weren’t part of that design. If you can’t answer that question, your statement is of no value.
    1
  67.  @riheg  no they don’t.
    1
  68. Another no channel content BOT.
    1
  69. What a stupid question.
    1
  70.  @flowerpower7288  no rise in suicides that’s just an anti vaxxer presumption.
    1
  71. That was debris, and you’ll notice there was only one. Where are all of the other Russian missiles did they vanish into thin air?
    1
  72. You don’t know what that was so you’re guessing. Is that right.
    1
  73. Yawn.
    1
  74. No its just you.
    1
  75. What’s your experience in missile engineering or weapons employment?
    1